Knee MR Using a Body Coil is Equivalent to CT in Measuring the TT-TG Distance: Removing the Systematic Bias
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162022000100082 |
Resumo: | Abstract Objective To compare magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using a body coil with computed tomography (CT) in measuring the tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance (TT-TG) and the patellar tendon-cartilaginous trochlear groove (PT-CTG) distances, and evaluate interrater reliability. Methods The study group consisted of 34 knees from 17 asymptomatic subjects with no history of knee pathology, trauma or surgery. A low-dose CT scan and an axial T1-weighted MRI sequence of the knees were performed with rigorous standardization of the positioning with full extension of the knees and parallel feet. Two musculoskeletal radiologists performed the measurements independently. The reliability of the TT-TG and PT-CTG distances on CT (17.1 ± 4.2 mm and 17.3 ± 4.2 mm) and of MRI (16.2 ± 3.7 mm and 16.5 ± 4.1 mm) was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC [2,1]) and Bland-Altman graphs, as well as the interrater reliability for both methods. Results Good reliability and agreement was observed between CT and MRI measurements for TT-TG and PT-CTG, with an ICC of 0.774 (p< 0.001) and 0.743 (p< 0.001), respectively, and no systematic bias was observed. The interrater reliability was excellent for all measurements on both imaging methods. Conclusion This was the first study that compared MRI using a body coil with CT in measuring the TT-TG distance, with the potential clinical implication that the CT in this clinical setting could be avoided. |
id |
SBOT-2_0d8f95d563ec656eba2cc06929f8525f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0102-36162022000100082 |
network_acronym_str |
SBOT-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Knee MR Using a Body Coil is Equivalent to CT in Measuring the TT-TG Distance: Removing the Systematic Biaskneemagnetic resonance imagingpatellar instabilitytomography, x-ray computedAbstract Objective To compare magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using a body coil with computed tomography (CT) in measuring the tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance (TT-TG) and the patellar tendon-cartilaginous trochlear groove (PT-CTG) distances, and evaluate interrater reliability. Methods The study group consisted of 34 knees from 17 asymptomatic subjects with no history of knee pathology, trauma or surgery. A low-dose CT scan and an axial T1-weighted MRI sequence of the knees were performed with rigorous standardization of the positioning with full extension of the knees and parallel feet. Two musculoskeletal radiologists performed the measurements independently. The reliability of the TT-TG and PT-CTG distances on CT (17.1 ± 4.2 mm and 17.3 ± 4.2 mm) and of MRI (16.2 ± 3.7 mm and 16.5 ± 4.1 mm) was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC [2,1]) and Bland-Altman graphs, as well as the interrater reliability for both methods. Results Good reliability and agreement was observed between CT and MRI measurements for TT-TG and PT-CTG, with an ICC of 0.774 (p< 0.001) and 0.743 (p< 0.001), respectively, and no systematic bias was observed. The interrater reliability was excellent for all measurements on both imaging methods. Conclusion This was the first study that compared MRI using a body coil with CT in measuring the TT-TG distance, with the potential clinical implication that the CT in this clinical setting could be avoided.Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162022000100082Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia v.57 n.1 2022reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)instacron:SBOT10.1055/s-0040-1718511info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAivazoglou,Laís UyedaToma,Mariana KeiArruda,Pedro Henrique CoelhoOrmond Filho,Alipio GomesGuimarães,Julio BrandãoSilva,Flávio Duarteeng2022-03-08T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-36162022000100082Revistahttp://www.rbo.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rbo@sbot.org.br1982-43780102-3616opendoar:2022-03-08T00:00Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Knee MR Using a Body Coil is Equivalent to CT in Measuring the TT-TG Distance: Removing the Systematic Bias |
title |
Knee MR Using a Body Coil is Equivalent to CT in Measuring the TT-TG Distance: Removing the Systematic Bias |
spellingShingle |
Knee MR Using a Body Coil is Equivalent to CT in Measuring the TT-TG Distance: Removing the Systematic Bias Aivazoglou,Laís Uyeda knee magnetic resonance imaging patellar instability tomography, x-ray computed |
title_short |
Knee MR Using a Body Coil is Equivalent to CT in Measuring the TT-TG Distance: Removing the Systematic Bias |
title_full |
Knee MR Using a Body Coil is Equivalent to CT in Measuring the TT-TG Distance: Removing the Systematic Bias |
title_fullStr |
Knee MR Using a Body Coil is Equivalent to CT in Measuring the TT-TG Distance: Removing the Systematic Bias |
title_full_unstemmed |
Knee MR Using a Body Coil is Equivalent to CT in Measuring the TT-TG Distance: Removing the Systematic Bias |
title_sort |
Knee MR Using a Body Coil is Equivalent to CT in Measuring the TT-TG Distance: Removing the Systematic Bias |
author |
Aivazoglou,Laís Uyeda |
author_facet |
Aivazoglou,Laís Uyeda Toma,Mariana Kei Arruda,Pedro Henrique Coelho Ormond Filho,Alipio Gomes Guimarães,Julio Brandão Silva,Flávio Duarte |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Toma,Mariana Kei Arruda,Pedro Henrique Coelho Ormond Filho,Alipio Gomes Guimarães,Julio Brandão Silva,Flávio Duarte |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Aivazoglou,Laís Uyeda Toma,Mariana Kei Arruda,Pedro Henrique Coelho Ormond Filho,Alipio Gomes Guimarães,Julio Brandão Silva,Flávio Duarte |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
knee magnetic resonance imaging patellar instability tomography, x-ray computed |
topic |
knee magnetic resonance imaging patellar instability tomography, x-ray computed |
description |
Abstract Objective To compare magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using a body coil with computed tomography (CT) in measuring the tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance (TT-TG) and the patellar tendon-cartilaginous trochlear groove (PT-CTG) distances, and evaluate interrater reliability. Methods The study group consisted of 34 knees from 17 asymptomatic subjects with no history of knee pathology, trauma or surgery. A low-dose CT scan and an axial T1-weighted MRI sequence of the knees were performed with rigorous standardization of the positioning with full extension of the knees and parallel feet. Two musculoskeletal radiologists performed the measurements independently. The reliability of the TT-TG and PT-CTG distances on CT (17.1 ± 4.2 mm and 17.3 ± 4.2 mm) and of MRI (16.2 ± 3.7 mm and 16.5 ± 4.1 mm) was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC [2,1]) and Bland-Altman graphs, as well as the interrater reliability for both methods. Results Good reliability and agreement was observed between CT and MRI measurements for TT-TG and PT-CTG, with an ICC of 0.774 (p< 0.001) and 0.743 (p< 0.001), respectively, and no systematic bias was observed. The interrater reliability was excellent for all measurements on both imaging methods. Conclusion This was the first study that compared MRI using a body coil with CT in measuring the TT-TG distance, with the potential clinical implication that the CT in this clinical setting could be avoided. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162022000100082 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162022000100082 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1055/s-0040-1718511 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia v.57 n.1 2022 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT) instacron:SBOT |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT) |
instacron_str |
SBOT |
institution |
SBOT |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rbo@sbot.org.br |
_version_ |
1752122363265155072 |