Fat embolism syndrome in femoral shaft fractures: does the initial treatment make a difference?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162017000500535 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Objective: To identify the risk factors correlated with the initial treatment performed. Methods: This is a retrospective study involving a total of 272 patients diagnosed with femoral shaft fractures. Of the patients, 14% were kept at rest until the surgical treatment, 52% underwent external fixation, 10% received immediate definitive treatment, and 23% remained in skeletal traction (23%) until definitive treatment., Results: There were six cases of fat embolism syndrome (FES), which showed that , polytrauma is the main risk factor for its development and that initial therapy was not important. Conclusion: Polytrauma patients have a greater chance of developing FES and there was no influence from the initial treatment. |
id |
SBOT-2_2474c0af52b0cf5bed327d3262afbae3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0102-36162017000500535 |
network_acronym_str |
SBOT-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Fat embolism syndrome in femoral shaft fractures: does the initial treatment make a difference?Femoral fracturesFracture fixationMultiple traumaFat embolismABSTRACT Objective: To identify the risk factors correlated with the initial treatment performed. Methods: This is a retrospective study involving a total of 272 patients diagnosed with femoral shaft fractures. Of the patients, 14% were kept at rest until the surgical treatment, 52% underwent external fixation, 10% received immediate definitive treatment, and 23% remained in skeletal traction (23%) until definitive treatment., Results: There were six cases of fat embolism syndrome (FES), which showed that , polytrauma is the main risk factor for its development and that initial therapy was not important. Conclusion: Polytrauma patients have a greater chance of developing FES and there was no influence from the initial treatment.Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia2017-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162017000500535Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia v.52 n.5 2017reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)instacron:SBOT10.1016/j.rboe.2016.08.021info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva,Janio Jose Alves BezerraDiana,Diogo de AlmeidaSalas,Victor Eduardo RomanZamboni,CaioHungria Neto,Jose SoaresChristian,Ralph Waltereng2017-11-10T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-36162017000500535Revistahttp://www.rbo.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rbo@sbot.org.br1982-43780102-3616opendoar:2017-11-10T00:00Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Fat embolism syndrome in femoral shaft fractures: does the initial treatment make a difference? |
title |
Fat embolism syndrome in femoral shaft fractures: does the initial treatment make a difference? |
spellingShingle |
Fat embolism syndrome in femoral shaft fractures: does the initial treatment make a difference? Silva,Janio Jose Alves Bezerra Femoral fractures Fracture fixation Multiple trauma Fat embolism |
title_short |
Fat embolism syndrome in femoral shaft fractures: does the initial treatment make a difference? |
title_full |
Fat embolism syndrome in femoral shaft fractures: does the initial treatment make a difference? |
title_fullStr |
Fat embolism syndrome in femoral shaft fractures: does the initial treatment make a difference? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Fat embolism syndrome in femoral shaft fractures: does the initial treatment make a difference? |
title_sort |
Fat embolism syndrome in femoral shaft fractures: does the initial treatment make a difference? |
author |
Silva,Janio Jose Alves Bezerra |
author_facet |
Silva,Janio Jose Alves Bezerra Diana,Diogo de Almeida Salas,Victor Eduardo Roman Zamboni,Caio Hungria Neto,Jose Soares Christian,Ralph Walter |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Diana,Diogo de Almeida Salas,Victor Eduardo Roman Zamboni,Caio Hungria Neto,Jose Soares Christian,Ralph Walter |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva,Janio Jose Alves Bezerra Diana,Diogo de Almeida Salas,Victor Eduardo Roman Zamboni,Caio Hungria Neto,Jose Soares Christian,Ralph Walter |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Femoral fractures Fracture fixation Multiple trauma Fat embolism |
topic |
Femoral fractures Fracture fixation Multiple trauma Fat embolism |
description |
ABSTRACT Objective: To identify the risk factors correlated with the initial treatment performed. Methods: This is a retrospective study involving a total of 272 patients diagnosed with femoral shaft fractures. Of the patients, 14% were kept at rest until the surgical treatment, 52% underwent external fixation, 10% received immediate definitive treatment, and 23% remained in skeletal traction (23%) until definitive treatment., Results: There were six cases of fat embolism syndrome (FES), which showed that , polytrauma is the main risk factor for its development and that initial therapy was not important. Conclusion: Polytrauma patients have a greater chance of developing FES and there was no influence from the initial treatment. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162017000500535 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162017000500535 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1016/j.rboe.2016.08.021 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia v.52 n.5 2017 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT) instacron:SBOT |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT) |
instacron_str |
SBOT |
institution |
SBOT |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rbo@sbot.org.br |
_version_ |
1752122360916344832 |