Biomechanical Study of Different Femoral Fixation Devices in the Reconstruction of the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament in Porcine Knees

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Dobke,Lothar Schmechel
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Bonadiman,João Artur, Lopes Jr,Osmar Valadão, Saggin,Paulo Renato, Israel,Charles Leonardo, Spinelli,Leandro de Freitas
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162020000600771
Resumo: Abstract Objective To evaluate different femoral fixation devices for medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction and compare their effectiveness regarding fixation strength up to failure in porcine knees. Methods Thirty porcine knees were used, divided into three groups of 10 knees. The removed grafts were dissected from the extensor tendons of porcine feet. In each group, the graft was fixed to the femur with an interference screw, an anchor, or adductor tenodesis. The three methods were subjected to biomechanical tests using a universal Tensile testing machine at a speed of 20 mm/minute. Results The highest average linear resistance under lateral traction occurred in group 1, “screw fixation” (185.45 ± 41.22 N), followed by group 2, “anchor fixation” (152.97 ± 49, 43 N); the lower average was observed in group 3, “tenodesis fixation” (76.69 ± 18.90 N). According to the fixed error margin (5%), there was a significant difference between groups (p < 0.001); in addition, multiple comparison tests (between group pairs) also showed significant differences. Variability was small, since the variance coefficient was lower than 33.3%. Conclusion Interference screws in bone tunnels and mountable anchors fixation with high resistance wire are strong enough for femoral fixation in porcine medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Adductor tenodesis, however, was deemed fragile for such purpose.
id SBOT-2_2560a8776d44fdd7ee5d219140ff4240
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0102-36162020000600771
network_acronym_str SBOT-2
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Biomechanical Study of Different Femoral Fixation Devices in the Reconstruction of the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament in Porcine Kneesbiomechanical phenomenajoint ligamentsanimal modelspatellofemoral jointsuture techniqueorthopedic fixation devicesAbstract Objective To evaluate different femoral fixation devices for medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction and compare their effectiveness regarding fixation strength up to failure in porcine knees. Methods Thirty porcine knees were used, divided into three groups of 10 knees. The removed grafts were dissected from the extensor tendons of porcine feet. In each group, the graft was fixed to the femur with an interference screw, an anchor, or adductor tenodesis. The three methods were subjected to biomechanical tests using a universal Tensile testing machine at a speed of 20 mm/minute. Results The highest average linear resistance under lateral traction occurred in group 1, “screw fixation” (185.45 ± 41.22 N), followed by group 2, “anchor fixation” (152.97 ± 49, 43 N); the lower average was observed in group 3, “tenodesis fixation” (76.69 ± 18.90 N). According to the fixed error margin (5%), there was a significant difference between groups (p < 0.001); in addition, multiple comparison tests (between group pairs) also showed significant differences. Variability was small, since the variance coefficient was lower than 33.3%. Conclusion Interference screws in bone tunnels and mountable anchors fixation with high resistance wire are strong enough for femoral fixation in porcine medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Adductor tenodesis, however, was deemed fragile for such purpose.Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia2020-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162020000600771Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia v.55 n.6 2020reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)instacron:SBOT10.1055/s-0040-1708520info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDobke,Lothar SchmechelBonadiman,João ArturLopes Jr,Osmar ValadãoSaggin,Paulo RenatoIsrael,Charles LeonardoSpinelli,Leandro de Freitaseng2021-02-01T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-36162020000600771Revistahttp://www.rbo.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rbo@sbot.org.br1982-43780102-3616opendoar:2021-02-01T00:00Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Biomechanical Study of Different Femoral Fixation Devices in the Reconstruction of the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament in Porcine Knees
title Biomechanical Study of Different Femoral Fixation Devices in the Reconstruction of the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament in Porcine Knees
spellingShingle Biomechanical Study of Different Femoral Fixation Devices in the Reconstruction of the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament in Porcine Knees
Dobke,Lothar Schmechel
biomechanical phenomena
joint ligaments
animal models
patellofemoral joint
suture technique
orthopedic fixation devices
title_short Biomechanical Study of Different Femoral Fixation Devices in the Reconstruction of the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament in Porcine Knees
title_full Biomechanical Study of Different Femoral Fixation Devices in the Reconstruction of the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament in Porcine Knees
title_fullStr Biomechanical Study of Different Femoral Fixation Devices in the Reconstruction of the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament in Porcine Knees
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical Study of Different Femoral Fixation Devices in the Reconstruction of the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament in Porcine Knees
title_sort Biomechanical Study of Different Femoral Fixation Devices in the Reconstruction of the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament in Porcine Knees
author Dobke,Lothar Schmechel
author_facet Dobke,Lothar Schmechel
Bonadiman,João Artur
Lopes Jr,Osmar Valadão
Saggin,Paulo Renato
Israel,Charles Leonardo
Spinelli,Leandro de Freitas
author_role author
author2 Bonadiman,João Artur
Lopes Jr,Osmar Valadão
Saggin,Paulo Renato
Israel,Charles Leonardo
Spinelli,Leandro de Freitas
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Dobke,Lothar Schmechel
Bonadiman,João Artur
Lopes Jr,Osmar Valadão
Saggin,Paulo Renato
Israel,Charles Leonardo
Spinelli,Leandro de Freitas
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv biomechanical phenomena
joint ligaments
animal models
patellofemoral joint
suture technique
orthopedic fixation devices
topic biomechanical phenomena
joint ligaments
animal models
patellofemoral joint
suture technique
orthopedic fixation devices
description Abstract Objective To evaluate different femoral fixation devices for medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction and compare their effectiveness regarding fixation strength up to failure in porcine knees. Methods Thirty porcine knees were used, divided into three groups of 10 knees. The removed grafts were dissected from the extensor tendons of porcine feet. In each group, the graft was fixed to the femur with an interference screw, an anchor, or adductor tenodesis. The three methods were subjected to biomechanical tests using a universal Tensile testing machine at a speed of 20 mm/minute. Results The highest average linear resistance under lateral traction occurred in group 1, “screw fixation” (185.45 ± 41.22 N), followed by group 2, “anchor fixation” (152.97 ± 49, 43 N); the lower average was observed in group 3, “tenodesis fixation” (76.69 ± 18.90 N). According to the fixed error margin (5%), there was a significant difference between groups (p < 0.001); in addition, multiple comparison tests (between group pairs) also showed significant differences. Variability was small, since the variance coefficient was lower than 33.3%. Conclusion Interference screws in bone tunnels and mountable anchors fixation with high resistance wire are strong enough for femoral fixation in porcine medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Adductor tenodesis, however, was deemed fragile for such purpose.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162020000600771
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162020000600771
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1055/s-0040-1708520
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia v.55 n.6 2020
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)
instacron:SBOT
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)
instacron_str SBOT
institution SBOT
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rbo@sbot.org.br
_version_ 1752122362784907264