Evaluation of clinical tests and magnetic resonance imaging for knee meniscal injuries: correlation with video arthroscopy

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Antunes,Leonardo Côrtes
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Souza,José Marcio Gonçalves de, Cerqueira,Nelson Baisi, Dahmer,Cleiton, Tavares,Breno Almeida de Pinho, Faria,Ângelo José Nacif de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162017000500582
Resumo: ABSTRACT Objective: To determine the specificity, sensitivity, accuracy, likelihood, and correlation of the findings of meniscal tests and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to knee video arthroscopy., Methods: A cross-sectional study, conducted between June and December 2015, which evaluated 84 patients with meniscal tears (MT) selected for video arthroscopy. Two orthopedic trainees and a resident performed a physical examination with specific tests. The results and reports from MRI were compared with arthroscopy findings. The data were analyzed in the statistical program , R. Results: The Steinmann I, test was the most specific, with specificity of 86% and 91% for medial meniscus tears (MMT) and lateral meniscus tears (LMT), respectively. With regard to accuracy, the pain test on palpation of the joint interline (PPJI) showed values of 67% and 73% for detection of MMT and LMT, respectively. The PPJI test showed higher sensitivity, with a 77% chance of detecting MMT. Analysis of the set of three tests (McMurray, PPJI, and Steinmann , I, ) compared to arthroscopy showed 85% sensitivity for MMT and 70% sensitivity for LMT. MRI showed a greater specificity for the diagnosis of MMT and LMT; the values were 82% and 91%, respectively. Conclusion: The combination of the three tests shows better results compared to the isolated tests and thus can be associated to the MRI to make an effective diagnosis. However, further studies assisting in the development of a protocol to standardize diagnostic evaluation are required.
id SBOT-2_5f8eb716a1c64075cd619e7fa8e30c13
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0102-36162017000500582
network_acronym_str SBOT-2
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Evaluation of clinical tests and magnetic resonance imaging for knee meniscal injuries: correlation with video arthroscopyPhysical examinationKneeArthroscopyMagnetic resonance imagingABSTRACT Objective: To determine the specificity, sensitivity, accuracy, likelihood, and correlation of the findings of meniscal tests and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to knee video arthroscopy., Methods: A cross-sectional study, conducted between June and December 2015, which evaluated 84 patients with meniscal tears (MT) selected for video arthroscopy. Two orthopedic trainees and a resident performed a physical examination with specific tests. The results and reports from MRI were compared with arthroscopy findings. The data were analyzed in the statistical program , R. Results: The Steinmann I, test was the most specific, with specificity of 86% and 91% for medial meniscus tears (MMT) and lateral meniscus tears (LMT), respectively. With regard to accuracy, the pain test on palpation of the joint interline (PPJI) showed values of 67% and 73% for detection of MMT and LMT, respectively. The PPJI test showed higher sensitivity, with a 77% chance of detecting MMT. Analysis of the set of three tests (McMurray, PPJI, and Steinmann , I, ) compared to arthroscopy showed 85% sensitivity for MMT and 70% sensitivity for LMT. MRI showed a greater specificity for the diagnosis of MMT and LMT; the values were 82% and 91%, respectively. Conclusion: The combination of the three tests shows better results compared to the isolated tests and thus can be associated to the MRI to make an effective diagnosis. However, further studies assisting in the development of a protocol to standardize diagnostic evaluation are required.Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia2017-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162017000500582Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia v.52 n.5 2017reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)instacron:SBOT10.1016/j.rboe.2016.09.009info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAntunes,Leonardo CôrtesSouza,José Marcio Gonçalves deCerqueira,Nelson BaisiDahmer,CleitonTavares,Breno Almeida de PinhoFaria,Ângelo José Nacif deeng2017-11-10T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-36162017000500582Revistahttp://www.rbo.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rbo@sbot.org.br1982-43780102-3616opendoar:2017-11-10T00:00Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of clinical tests and magnetic resonance imaging for knee meniscal injuries: correlation with video arthroscopy
title Evaluation of clinical tests and magnetic resonance imaging for knee meniscal injuries: correlation with video arthroscopy
spellingShingle Evaluation of clinical tests and magnetic resonance imaging for knee meniscal injuries: correlation with video arthroscopy
Antunes,Leonardo Côrtes
Physical examination
Knee
Arthroscopy
Magnetic resonance imaging
title_short Evaluation of clinical tests and magnetic resonance imaging for knee meniscal injuries: correlation with video arthroscopy
title_full Evaluation of clinical tests and magnetic resonance imaging for knee meniscal injuries: correlation with video arthroscopy
title_fullStr Evaluation of clinical tests and magnetic resonance imaging for knee meniscal injuries: correlation with video arthroscopy
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of clinical tests and magnetic resonance imaging for knee meniscal injuries: correlation with video arthroscopy
title_sort Evaluation of clinical tests and magnetic resonance imaging for knee meniscal injuries: correlation with video arthroscopy
author Antunes,Leonardo Côrtes
author_facet Antunes,Leonardo Côrtes
Souza,José Marcio Gonçalves de
Cerqueira,Nelson Baisi
Dahmer,Cleiton
Tavares,Breno Almeida de Pinho
Faria,Ângelo José Nacif de
author_role author
author2 Souza,José Marcio Gonçalves de
Cerqueira,Nelson Baisi
Dahmer,Cleiton
Tavares,Breno Almeida de Pinho
Faria,Ângelo José Nacif de
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Antunes,Leonardo Côrtes
Souza,José Marcio Gonçalves de
Cerqueira,Nelson Baisi
Dahmer,Cleiton
Tavares,Breno Almeida de Pinho
Faria,Ângelo José Nacif de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Physical examination
Knee
Arthroscopy
Magnetic resonance imaging
topic Physical examination
Knee
Arthroscopy
Magnetic resonance imaging
description ABSTRACT Objective: To determine the specificity, sensitivity, accuracy, likelihood, and correlation of the findings of meniscal tests and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to knee video arthroscopy., Methods: A cross-sectional study, conducted between June and December 2015, which evaluated 84 patients with meniscal tears (MT) selected for video arthroscopy. Two orthopedic trainees and a resident performed a physical examination with specific tests. The results and reports from MRI were compared with arthroscopy findings. The data were analyzed in the statistical program , R. Results: The Steinmann I, test was the most specific, with specificity of 86% and 91% for medial meniscus tears (MMT) and lateral meniscus tears (LMT), respectively. With regard to accuracy, the pain test on palpation of the joint interline (PPJI) showed values of 67% and 73% for detection of MMT and LMT, respectively. The PPJI test showed higher sensitivity, with a 77% chance of detecting MMT. Analysis of the set of three tests (McMurray, PPJI, and Steinmann , I, ) compared to arthroscopy showed 85% sensitivity for MMT and 70% sensitivity for LMT. MRI showed a greater specificity for the diagnosis of MMT and LMT; the values were 82% and 91%, respectively. Conclusion: The combination of the three tests shows better results compared to the isolated tests and thus can be associated to the MRI to make an effective diagnosis. However, further studies assisting in the development of a protocol to standardize diagnostic evaluation are required.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162017000500582
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162017000500582
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1016/j.rboe.2016.09.009
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia v.52 n.5 2017
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)
instacron:SBOT
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)
instacron_str SBOT
institution SBOT
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rbo@sbot.org.br
_version_ 1752122360931024896