Does the suction drain diameter matter? Bleeding analysis after total knee replacement comparing different suction drain gauges

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Leao,Marcos George de Souza
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Pedroza Neta,Gladys Martins, Silva,Thiago Montenegro da, Ferreira,Yacov Machado Costa, Dias,Waryla Raissa Vasconcelos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162016000500547
Resumo: ABSTRACT OBJECTIVES: To evaluate bleeding and the estimated blood loss in patients who underwent total knee replacement (TKR) with different closed suction drains (3.2-mm and 4.8-mm gauge). METHODS: This was a randomized controlled trial with 22 patients who underwent TKR and were divided into two groups: Group I, with 11 patients in whom the 3.2-mm suction drain was used, and Group II, with 11 patients in whom the 4.8-mm suction drain was used. The hematocrit was measured after 24, 48 and 72 h after surgery in order to calculate the estimated blood loss. The drained volume was measured 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after TKR, and thereafter both groups were compared. RESULTS: Regarding the hematocrit, there were no differences between groups in measured periods (24, 48, and 72 h after surgery). The total bleeding measured at the suction drains within 48 h was higher in Group II, with a statistically significant difference (p = 0.005); in the first 24 h, there was major bleeding in Group II (mean 893 mL), with a significant difference (p = 0.004). Between 24 and 48 h, there was no statistically significant difference in both groups (p = 0.710). The total estimated bleeding was higher in Group I, with mean of 463 mL, versus 409 mL in Group II, with no statistical significance (p = 0.394). CONCLUSIONS: Bleeding was higher in the group that used the 4.8 mm gauge suction drain, with no differences in hematocrit and estimated blood loss.
id SBOT-2_6b5a767f63dc528505c62161fc87763d
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0102-36162016000500547
network_acronym_str SBOT-2
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Does the suction drain diameter matter? Bleeding analysis after total knee replacement comparing different suction drain gaugesBlood loss/surgicalArthroplasty/replacement/kneeDrainageABSTRACT OBJECTIVES: To evaluate bleeding and the estimated blood loss in patients who underwent total knee replacement (TKR) with different closed suction drains (3.2-mm and 4.8-mm gauge). METHODS: This was a randomized controlled trial with 22 patients who underwent TKR and were divided into two groups: Group I, with 11 patients in whom the 3.2-mm suction drain was used, and Group II, with 11 patients in whom the 4.8-mm suction drain was used. The hematocrit was measured after 24, 48 and 72 h after surgery in order to calculate the estimated blood loss. The drained volume was measured 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after TKR, and thereafter both groups were compared. RESULTS: Regarding the hematocrit, there were no differences between groups in measured periods (24, 48, and 72 h after surgery). The total bleeding measured at the suction drains within 48 h was higher in Group II, with a statistically significant difference (p = 0.005); in the first 24 h, there was major bleeding in Group II (mean 893 mL), with a significant difference (p = 0.004). Between 24 and 48 h, there was no statistically significant difference in both groups (p = 0.710). The total estimated bleeding was higher in Group I, with mean of 463 mL, versus 409 mL in Group II, with no statistical significance (p = 0.394). CONCLUSIONS: Bleeding was higher in the group that used the 4.8 mm gauge suction drain, with no differences in hematocrit and estimated blood loss.Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia2016-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162016000500547Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia v.51 n.5 2016reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)instacron:SBOT10.1016/j.rboe.2016.08.014info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLeao,Marcos George de SouzaPedroza Neta,Gladys MartinsSilva,Thiago Montenegro daFerreira,Yacov Machado CostaDias,Waryla Raissa Vasconceloseng2016-11-18T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-36162016000500547Revistahttp://www.rbo.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rbo@sbot.org.br1982-43780102-3616opendoar:2016-11-18T00:00Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Does the suction drain diameter matter? Bleeding analysis after total knee replacement comparing different suction drain gauges
title Does the suction drain diameter matter? Bleeding analysis after total knee replacement comparing different suction drain gauges
spellingShingle Does the suction drain diameter matter? Bleeding analysis after total knee replacement comparing different suction drain gauges
Leao,Marcos George de Souza
Blood loss/surgical
Arthroplasty/replacement/knee
Drainage
title_short Does the suction drain diameter matter? Bleeding analysis after total knee replacement comparing different suction drain gauges
title_full Does the suction drain diameter matter? Bleeding analysis after total knee replacement comparing different suction drain gauges
title_fullStr Does the suction drain diameter matter? Bleeding analysis after total knee replacement comparing different suction drain gauges
title_full_unstemmed Does the suction drain diameter matter? Bleeding analysis after total knee replacement comparing different suction drain gauges
title_sort Does the suction drain diameter matter? Bleeding analysis after total knee replacement comparing different suction drain gauges
author Leao,Marcos George de Souza
author_facet Leao,Marcos George de Souza
Pedroza Neta,Gladys Martins
Silva,Thiago Montenegro da
Ferreira,Yacov Machado Costa
Dias,Waryla Raissa Vasconcelos
author_role author
author2 Pedroza Neta,Gladys Martins
Silva,Thiago Montenegro da
Ferreira,Yacov Machado Costa
Dias,Waryla Raissa Vasconcelos
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Leao,Marcos George de Souza
Pedroza Neta,Gladys Martins
Silva,Thiago Montenegro da
Ferreira,Yacov Machado Costa
Dias,Waryla Raissa Vasconcelos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Blood loss/surgical
Arthroplasty/replacement/knee
Drainage
topic Blood loss/surgical
Arthroplasty/replacement/knee
Drainage
description ABSTRACT OBJECTIVES: To evaluate bleeding and the estimated blood loss in patients who underwent total knee replacement (TKR) with different closed suction drains (3.2-mm and 4.8-mm gauge). METHODS: This was a randomized controlled trial with 22 patients who underwent TKR and were divided into two groups: Group I, with 11 patients in whom the 3.2-mm suction drain was used, and Group II, with 11 patients in whom the 4.8-mm suction drain was used. The hematocrit was measured after 24, 48 and 72 h after surgery in order to calculate the estimated blood loss. The drained volume was measured 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after TKR, and thereafter both groups were compared. RESULTS: Regarding the hematocrit, there were no differences between groups in measured periods (24, 48, and 72 h after surgery). The total bleeding measured at the suction drains within 48 h was higher in Group II, with a statistically significant difference (p = 0.005); in the first 24 h, there was major bleeding in Group II (mean 893 mL), with a significant difference (p = 0.004). Between 24 and 48 h, there was no statistically significant difference in both groups (p = 0.710). The total estimated bleeding was higher in Group I, with mean of 463 mL, versus 409 mL in Group II, with no statistical significance (p = 0.394). CONCLUSIONS: Bleeding was higher in the group that used the 4.8 mm gauge suction drain, with no differences in hematocrit and estimated blood loss.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-10-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162016000500547
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162016000500547
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1016/j.rboe.2016.08.014
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia v.51 n.5 2016
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)
instacron:SBOT
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)
instacron_str SBOT
institution SBOT
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rbo@sbot.org.br
_version_ 1752122360467554304