Comparative analysis of treatment of basicervical femur fractures in young adults with CCS, DHS, and PFN

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Sharma,Anmol
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Sethi,Anisha, Sharma,Shardaindu
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162018000600783
Resumo: ABSTRACT Objective: To the best of the authors' knowledge, no studies in the literature have compared the clinical outcome of the three most common implants used to treat basicervical fractures of the femoral neck in young adults, i.e. CCS, DHS, and PFN. The present study attempts to fill the void in the literature and reach a conclusion regarding the usefulness of these implants in these fractures. Methods: This was a prospective interventional study including 90 patients with basicervical fracture of the neck of femur treated randomly with cancellous cannulated lag screws or dynamic hip screw, with a derotation screw or short PFN. Results: Mean time for fracture union was 14.4, 13.9, and 13.5 weeks and union rate was 93.2%, 100%, and 100% in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The mean Harris Hip Score at the final follow up was similar among all the groups, i.e. 79.4, 82.2, and 81.9 in CCS, DHS, and PFN groups, respectively. The highest proportion of good to excellent results was noted in the DHS group, i.e. 83.3%, whereas it was 73.6% and 80% in the CCS and PFN groups, respectively. Conclusion: Multiple cancellous screws do not provide a sufficiently stable construct during fracture healing. PFN, although associated with lesser implant failures than CCS, have a higher incidence of technical errors. DHS provides sufficient stability in well-reduced basicervical fractures in young adults; it is associated with highest fracture union rates and best functional outcome out of the three implants at final follow-up.
id SBOT-2_84d0096c561194dd5186b5801d18af6e
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0102-36162018000600783
network_acronym_str SBOT-2
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Comparative analysis of treatment of basicervical femur fractures in young adults with CCS, DHS, and PFNHip fracturesBone nailsBone screwsFemoral fracturesFracture fixationIntramedullaryABSTRACT Objective: To the best of the authors' knowledge, no studies in the literature have compared the clinical outcome of the three most common implants used to treat basicervical fractures of the femoral neck in young adults, i.e. CCS, DHS, and PFN. The present study attempts to fill the void in the literature and reach a conclusion regarding the usefulness of these implants in these fractures. Methods: This was a prospective interventional study including 90 patients with basicervical fracture of the neck of femur treated randomly with cancellous cannulated lag screws or dynamic hip screw, with a derotation screw or short PFN. Results: Mean time for fracture union was 14.4, 13.9, and 13.5 weeks and union rate was 93.2%, 100%, and 100% in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The mean Harris Hip Score at the final follow up was similar among all the groups, i.e. 79.4, 82.2, and 81.9 in CCS, DHS, and PFN groups, respectively. The highest proportion of good to excellent results was noted in the DHS group, i.e. 83.3%, whereas it was 73.6% and 80% in the CCS and PFN groups, respectively. Conclusion: Multiple cancellous screws do not provide a sufficiently stable construct during fracture healing. PFN, although associated with lesser implant failures than CCS, have a higher incidence of technical errors. DHS provides sufficient stability in well-reduced basicervical fractures in young adults; it is associated with highest fracture union rates and best functional outcome out of the three implants at final follow-up.Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia2018-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162018000600783Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia v.53 n.6 2018reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)instacron:SBOT10.1016/j.rboe.2017.08.022info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSharma,AnmolSethi,AnishaSharma,Shardaindueng2018-11-29T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-36162018000600783Revistahttp://www.rbo.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rbo@sbot.org.br1982-43780102-3616opendoar:2018-11-29T00:00Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparative analysis of treatment of basicervical femur fractures in young adults with CCS, DHS, and PFN
title Comparative analysis of treatment of basicervical femur fractures in young adults with CCS, DHS, and PFN
spellingShingle Comparative analysis of treatment of basicervical femur fractures in young adults with CCS, DHS, and PFN
Sharma,Anmol
Hip fractures
Bone nails
Bone screws
Femoral fractures
Fracture fixation
Intramedullary
title_short Comparative analysis of treatment of basicervical femur fractures in young adults with CCS, DHS, and PFN
title_full Comparative analysis of treatment of basicervical femur fractures in young adults with CCS, DHS, and PFN
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of treatment of basicervical femur fractures in young adults with CCS, DHS, and PFN
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of treatment of basicervical femur fractures in young adults with CCS, DHS, and PFN
title_sort Comparative analysis of treatment of basicervical femur fractures in young adults with CCS, DHS, and PFN
author Sharma,Anmol
author_facet Sharma,Anmol
Sethi,Anisha
Sharma,Shardaindu
author_role author
author2 Sethi,Anisha
Sharma,Shardaindu
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sharma,Anmol
Sethi,Anisha
Sharma,Shardaindu
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Hip fractures
Bone nails
Bone screws
Femoral fractures
Fracture fixation
Intramedullary
topic Hip fractures
Bone nails
Bone screws
Femoral fractures
Fracture fixation
Intramedullary
description ABSTRACT Objective: To the best of the authors' knowledge, no studies in the literature have compared the clinical outcome of the three most common implants used to treat basicervical fractures of the femoral neck in young adults, i.e. CCS, DHS, and PFN. The present study attempts to fill the void in the literature and reach a conclusion regarding the usefulness of these implants in these fractures. Methods: This was a prospective interventional study including 90 patients with basicervical fracture of the neck of femur treated randomly with cancellous cannulated lag screws or dynamic hip screw, with a derotation screw or short PFN. Results: Mean time for fracture union was 14.4, 13.9, and 13.5 weeks and union rate was 93.2%, 100%, and 100% in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The mean Harris Hip Score at the final follow up was similar among all the groups, i.e. 79.4, 82.2, and 81.9 in CCS, DHS, and PFN groups, respectively. The highest proportion of good to excellent results was noted in the DHS group, i.e. 83.3%, whereas it was 73.6% and 80% in the CCS and PFN groups, respectively. Conclusion: Multiple cancellous screws do not provide a sufficiently stable construct during fracture healing. PFN, although associated with lesser implant failures than CCS, have a higher incidence of technical errors. DHS provides sufficient stability in well-reduced basicervical fractures in young adults; it is associated with highest fracture union rates and best functional outcome out of the three implants at final follow-up.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162018000600783
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162018000600783
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1016/j.rboe.2017.08.022
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia v.53 n.6 2018
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)
instacron:SBOT
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)
instacron_str SBOT
institution SBOT
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rbo@sbot.org.br
_version_ 1752122361868451840