Does the supraspinatus tear pattern affect the results of the arthroscopic repair?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Malavolta,Eduardo Angeli
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Andrade-Silva,Fernando Brandão, Canhos,André Lange, Assunção,Jorge Henrique, Gracitelli,Mauro Emilio Conforto, Ferreira Neto,Arnaldo Amado
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162020000600742
Resumo: Abstract Objective To evaluate the influence of the supraspinal tear pattern on the pre- and postoperative functional evaluations. Methods A retrospective cohort study comparing patients with supraspinatus crescent-shaped tears versus L- or U-shaped tears. We included patients undergoing complete supraspinatus arthroscopic repair. We did not include patients with subscapularis or infraspinatus repair, those submitted to open surgery, or those in whom only partial repair was achieved. The clinical scales used were the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment (ASES) and the Modified-University of California at Los Angeles Shoulder Rating Scale (UCLA), which were applied 1 week before and 24 months after the procedure. Results We analyzed 167 shoulders (from 163 patients). In the preoperative period, the ASES scale was significantly higher in the crescent-shaped pattern (43.5 ± 17.6 versus 37.7 ± 13.8; p = 0.034). The UCLA scale followed the same pattern (15.2 ± 4.6 versus 13.5 ± 3.6; p = 0.028). In the postoperative period, however, there was no significant difference. According to the ASES scale, crescent-shaped tears scored 83.7 ± 18.7 points, and L- or U-shaped tears scored 82.9 ± 20.1 (p = 0.887). The values were 30.9 ± 4.9 and 30.5 ± 5.6 (p = 0.773) respectively, by the UCLA scale. Conclusion Crescent-shaped and L- or U-shaped supraspinatus tears have similar postoperative functional results. In the preoperative period, the functional results are superior in crescent-shaped tears.
id SBOT-2_8621b895121cc89527624966c94f0e99
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0102-36162020000600742
network_acronym_str SBOT-2
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Does the supraspinatus tear pattern affect the results of the arthroscopic repair?rotator cuffarthroscopyarticular range of motionAbstract Objective To evaluate the influence of the supraspinal tear pattern on the pre- and postoperative functional evaluations. Methods A retrospective cohort study comparing patients with supraspinatus crescent-shaped tears versus L- or U-shaped tears. We included patients undergoing complete supraspinatus arthroscopic repair. We did not include patients with subscapularis or infraspinatus repair, those submitted to open surgery, or those in whom only partial repair was achieved. The clinical scales used were the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment (ASES) and the Modified-University of California at Los Angeles Shoulder Rating Scale (UCLA), which were applied 1 week before and 24 months after the procedure. Results We analyzed 167 shoulders (from 163 patients). In the preoperative period, the ASES scale was significantly higher in the crescent-shaped pattern (43.5 ± 17.6 versus 37.7 ± 13.8; p = 0.034). The UCLA scale followed the same pattern (15.2 ± 4.6 versus 13.5 ± 3.6; p = 0.028). In the postoperative period, however, there was no significant difference. According to the ASES scale, crescent-shaped tears scored 83.7 ± 18.7 points, and L- or U-shaped tears scored 82.9 ± 20.1 (p = 0.887). The values were 30.9 ± 4.9 and 30.5 ± 5.6 (p = 0.773) respectively, by the UCLA scale. Conclusion Crescent-shaped and L- or U-shaped supraspinatus tears have similar postoperative functional results. In the preoperative period, the functional results are superior in crescent-shaped tears.Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia2020-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162020000600742Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia v.55 n.6 2020reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)instacron:SBOT10.1055/s-0039-1698803info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMalavolta,Eduardo AngeliAndrade-Silva,Fernando BrandãoCanhos,André LangeAssunção,Jorge HenriqueGracitelli,Mauro Emilio ConfortoFerreira Neto,Arnaldo Amadoeng2021-02-01T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-36162020000600742Revistahttp://www.rbo.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rbo@sbot.org.br1982-43780102-3616opendoar:2021-02-01T00:00Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Does the supraspinatus tear pattern affect the results of the arthroscopic repair?
title Does the supraspinatus tear pattern affect the results of the arthroscopic repair?
spellingShingle Does the supraspinatus tear pattern affect the results of the arthroscopic repair?
Malavolta,Eduardo Angeli
rotator cuff
arthroscopy
articular range of motion
title_short Does the supraspinatus tear pattern affect the results of the arthroscopic repair?
title_full Does the supraspinatus tear pattern affect the results of the arthroscopic repair?
title_fullStr Does the supraspinatus tear pattern affect the results of the arthroscopic repair?
title_full_unstemmed Does the supraspinatus tear pattern affect the results of the arthroscopic repair?
title_sort Does the supraspinatus tear pattern affect the results of the arthroscopic repair?
author Malavolta,Eduardo Angeli
author_facet Malavolta,Eduardo Angeli
Andrade-Silva,Fernando Brandão
Canhos,André Lange
Assunção,Jorge Henrique
Gracitelli,Mauro Emilio Conforto
Ferreira Neto,Arnaldo Amado
author_role author
author2 Andrade-Silva,Fernando Brandão
Canhos,André Lange
Assunção,Jorge Henrique
Gracitelli,Mauro Emilio Conforto
Ferreira Neto,Arnaldo Amado
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Malavolta,Eduardo Angeli
Andrade-Silva,Fernando Brandão
Canhos,André Lange
Assunção,Jorge Henrique
Gracitelli,Mauro Emilio Conforto
Ferreira Neto,Arnaldo Amado
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv rotator cuff
arthroscopy
articular range of motion
topic rotator cuff
arthroscopy
articular range of motion
description Abstract Objective To evaluate the influence of the supraspinal tear pattern on the pre- and postoperative functional evaluations. Methods A retrospective cohort study comparing patients with supraspinatus crescent-shaped tears versus L- or U-shaped tears. We included patients undergoing complete supraspinatus arthroscopic repair. We did not include patients with subscapularis or infraspinatus repair, those submitted to open surgery, or those in whom only partial repair was achieved. The clinical scales used were the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment (ASES) and the Modified-University of California at Los Angeles Shoulder Rating Scale (UCLA), which were applied 1 week before and 24 months after the procedure. Results We analyzed 167 shoulders (from 163 patients). In the preoperative period, the ASES scale was significantly higher in the crescent-shaped pattern (43.5 ± 17.6 versus 37.7 ± 13.8; p = 0.034). The UCLA scale followed the same pattern (15.2 ± 4.6 versus 13.5 ± 3.6; p = 0.028). In the postoperative period, however, there was no significant difference. According to the ASES scale, crescent-shaped tears scored 83.7 ± 18.7 points, and L- or U-shaped tears scored 82.9 ± 20.1 (p = 0.887). The values were 30.9 ± 4.9 and 30.5 ± 5.6 (p = 0.773) respectively, by the UCLA scale. Conclusion Crescent-shaped and L- or U-shaped supraspinatus tears have similar postoperative functional results. In the preoperative period, the functional results are superior in crescent-shaped tears.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162020000600742
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162020000600742
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1055/s-0039-1698803
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia v.55 n.6 2020
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)
instacron:SBOT
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)
instacron_str SBOT
institution SBOT
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rbo@sbot.org.br
_version_ 1752122362774421504