Evaluation of the reproducibility of the AO/ASIF classification for humeral shaft fractures
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162015000400378 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACTOBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reproducibility of the AO/Asif classification for humeral shaft fractures. METHODS: Consecutive radiographs of the arm in both anteroposterior and lateral view from 60 patients with humeral shaft fractures were analyzed. Six observers who were familiar with the AO/Asif classification (three shoulder and elbow surgery specialists and three general orthopedists) were selected to make the analysis, which was done at three different times. The data were subjected to statistical analysis using the kappa coefficient. RESULTS: The intra and interobserver concordance was statistically significant in all the analyses. CONCLUSIONS: All the evaluators showed concordance between the three evaluations that was considered to be statistically significant. However, the highest values were found among the specialists. |
id |
SBOT-2_92ba5334677a41e7ea9da9557ded13d4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0102-36162015000400378 |
network_acronym_str |
SBOT-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Evaluation of the reproducibility of the AO/ASIF classification for humeral shaft fracturesHumeral fractures/classificationHumeral fractures/radiographHumeral fractures/surgeryABSTRACTOBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reproducibility of the AO/Asif classification for humeral shaft fractures. METHODS: Consecutive radiographs of the arm in both anteroposterior and lateral view from 60 patients with humeral shaft fractures were analyzed. Six observers who were familiar with the AO/Asif classification (three shoulder and elbow surgery specialists and three general orthopedists) were selected to make the analysis, which was done at three different times. The data were subjected to statistical analysis using the kappa coefficient. RESULTS: The intra and interobserver concordance was statistically significant in all the analyses. CONCLUSIONS: All the evaluators showed concordance between the three evaluations that was considered to be statistically significant. However, the highest values were found among the specialists.Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia2015-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162015000400378Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia v.50 n.4 2015reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)instacron:SBOT10.1016/j.rboe.2015.07.003info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPignataro,Gustavo SorianoJunqueira,André EliasMatsunaga,Fabio TeruoMatsumoto,Marcelo HideBelloti,João CarlosTamaoki,Marcel Jun Sugawaraeng2015-11-16T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-36162015000400378Revistahttp://www.rbo.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rbo@sbot.org.br1982-43780102-3616opendoar:2015-11-16T00:00Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation of the reproducibility of the AO/ASIF classification for humeral shaft fractures |
title |
Evaluation of the reproducibility of the AO/ASIF classification for humeral shaft fractures |
spellingShingle |
Evaluation of the reproducibility of the AO/ASIF classification for humeral shaft fractures Pignataro,Gustavo Soriano Humeral fractures/classification Humeral fractures/radiograph Humeral fractures/surgery |
title_short |
Evaluation of the reproducibility of the AO/ASIF classification for humeral shaft fractures |
title_full |
Evaluation of the reproducibility of the AO/ASIF classification for humeral shaft fractures |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of the reproducibility of the AO/ASIF classification for humeral shaft fractures |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of the reproducibility of the AO/ASIF classification for humeral shaft fractures |
title_sort |
Evaluation of the reproducibility of the AO/ASIF classification for humeral shaft fractures |
author |
Pignataro,Gustavo Soriano |
author_facet |
Pignataro,Gustavo Soriano Junqueira,André Elias Matsunaga,Fabio Teruo Matsumoto,Marcelo Hide Belloti,João Carlos Tamaoki,Marcel Jun Sugawara |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Junqueira,André Elias Matsunaga,Fabio Teruo Matsumoto,Marcelo Hide Belloti,João Carlos Tamaoki,Marcel Jun Sugawara |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pignataro,Gustavo Soriano Junqueira,André Elias Matsunaga,Fabio Teruo Matsumoto,Marcelo Hide Belloti,João Carlos Tamaoki,Marcel Jun Sugawara |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Humeral fractures/classification Humeral fractures/radiograph Humeral fractures/surgery |
topic |
Humeral fractures/classification Humeral fractures/radiograph Humeral fractures/surgery |
description |
ABSTRACTOBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reproducibility of the AO/Asif classification for humeral shaft fractures. METHODS: Consecutive radiographs of the arm in both anteroposterior and lateral view from 60 patients with humeral shaft fractures were analyzed. Six observers who were familiar with the AO/Asif classification (three shoulder and elbow surgery specialists and three general orthopedists) were selected to make the analysis, which was done at three different times. The data were subjected to statistical analysis using the kappa coefficient. RESULTS: The intra and interobserver concordance was statistically significant in all the analyses. CONCLUSIONS: All the evaluators showed concordance between the three evaluations that was considered to be statistically significant. However, the highest values were found among the specialists. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-08-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162015000400378 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162015000400378 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1016/j.rboe.2015.07.003 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia v.50 n.4 2015 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT) instacron:SBOT |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT) |
instacron_str |
SBOT |
institution |
SBOT |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rbo@sbot.org.br |
_version_ |
1752122359692656640 |