Lumbar Decompression Versus Spinal Fusion ina Private Outpatient Setting: A Retrospective Study with Three Years of Follow-up

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira,Isadora Orlando de
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Lenza,Mario, Antonioli,Eliane, Ferretti,Mario
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162021000600766
Resumo: Abstract Objective To compare pain, function, quality of life and adverse events of lumbar decompression and spinal fusion in patients with degenerative spinal pathologies who participated in a second opinion program for spinal surgeries with a 36-month followup. Methods The data for this retrospective cohort were withdrawn from a private healthcare system between June 2011 and January 2014. The study sample consisted of 71 patients with a lumbar spine surgical referral. The outcomes for the comparisons between lumbar decompression and spinal fusion were quality of life (evaluated through the EuroQoL 5D), pain (measured by the Numerical Rating Scale) and function (assessed through the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire) measured at baseline, and at 12 and 36 months after the surgical procedures. The definitions of recovery were established by the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). The baseline differences between the groups were analyzed by non-paired t-test, and the differences in instrument scores between time points, by generalized mixed models. The results were presented as mean values adjusted by the models and 95% confidence intervals. Results Concerning the surgical techniques, 22 patients were submitted to spinal fusion and 49 patients, to lumbar decompression. As for the comparisons of the findings before and after the surgical interventions, the MCID was achieved in all outcomes regarding quality of life, pain and function at both time points when compared to baseline scores Moreover, concerning the complication rates, only lumbar decompression presented a surgical rate of 4% (n = 3) for recurrence of lumbar disc hernia. Conclusion Patients with degenerative spinal pathologies present improvements in long-term outcomes of pain, function and quality of life which are clinically significant, no matter the surgical intervention.
id SBOT-2_9e504cad8fa55e4e9d496d549f548a38
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0102-36162021000600766
network_acronym_str SBOT-2
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Lumbar Decompression Versus Spinal Fusion ina Private Outpatient Setting: A Retrospective Study with Three Years of Follow-upoutcome assessmenthealth caremusculoskeletal diseasesback painspinesurgical interventionsAbstract Objective To compare pain, function, quality of life and adverse events of lumbar decompression and spinal fusion in patients with degenerative spinal pathologies who participated in a second opinion program for spinal surgeries with a 36-month followup. Methods The data for this retrospective cohort were withdrawn from a private healthcare system between June 2011 and January 2014. The study sample consisted of 71 patients with a lumbar spine surgical referral. The outcomes for the comparisons between lumbar decompression and spinal fusion were quality of life (evaluated through the EuroQoL 5D), pain (measured by the Numerical Rating Scale) and function (assessed through the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire) measured at baseline, and at 12 and 36 months after the surgical procedures. The definitions of recovery were established by the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). The baseline differences between the groups were analyzed by non-paired t-test, and the differences in instrument scores between time points, by generalized mixed models. The results were presented as mean values adjusted by the models and 95% confidence intervals. Results Concerning the surgical techniques, 22 patients were submitted to spinal fusion and 49 patients, to lumbar decompression. As for the comparisons of the findings before and after the surgical interventions, the MCID was achieved in all outcomes regarding quality of life, pain and function at both time points when compared to baseline scores Moreover, concerning the complication rates, only lumbar decompression presented a surgical rate of 4% (n = 3) for recurrence of lumbar disc hernia. Conclusion Patients with degenerative spinal pathologies present improvements in long-term outcomes of pain, function and quality of life which are clinically significant, no matter the surgical intervention.Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia2021-11-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162021000600766Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia v.56 n.6 2021reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)instacron:SBOT10.1055/s-0041-1724083info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira,Isadora Orlando deLenza,MarioAntonioli,ElianeFerretti,Marioeng2022-01-07T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-36162021000600766Revistahttp://www.rbo.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rbo@sbot.org.br1982-43780102-3616opendoar:2022-01-07T00:00Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Lumbar Decompression Versus Spinal Fusion ina Private Outpatient Setting: A Retrospective Study with Three Years of Follow-up
title Lumbar Decompression Versus Spinal Fusion ina Private Outpatient Setting: A Retrospective Study with Three Years of Follow-up
spellingShingle Lumbar Decompression Versus Spinal Fusion ina Private Outpatient Setting: A Retrospective Study with Three Years of Follow-up
Oliveira,Isadora Orlando de
outcome assessment
health care
musculoskeletal diseases
back pain
spine
surgical interventions
title_short Lumbar Decompression Versus Spinal Fusion ina Private Outpatient Setting: A Retrospective Study with Three Years of Follow-up
title_full Lumbar Decompression Versus Spinal Fusion ina Private Outpatient Setting: A Retrospective Study with Three Years of Follow-up
title_fullStr Lumbar Decompression Versus Spinal Fusion ina Private Outpatient Setting: A Retrospective Study with Three Years of Follow-up
title_full_unstemmed Lumbar Decompression Versus Spinal Fusion ina Private Outpatient Setting: A Retrospective Study with Three Years of Follow-up
title_sort Lumbar Decompression Versus Spinal Fusion ina Private Outpatient Setting: A Retrospective Study with Three Years of Follow-up
author Oliveira,Isadora Orlando de
author_facet Oliveira,Isadora Orlando de
Lenza,Mario
Antonioli,Eliane
Ferretti,Mario
author_role author
author2 Lenza,Mario
Antonioli,Eliane
Ferretti,Mario
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira,Isadora Orlando de
Lenza,Mario
Antonioli,Eliane
Ferretti,Mario
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv outcome assessment
health care
musculoskeletal diseases
back pain
spine
surgical interventions
topic outcome assessment
health care
musculoskeletal diseases
back pain
spine
surgical interventions
description Abstract Objective To compare pain, function, quality of life and adverse events of lumbar decompression and spinal fusion in patients with degenerative spinal pathologies who participated in a second opinion program for spinal surgeries with a 36-month followup. Methods The data for this retrospective cohort were withdrawn from a private healthcare system between June 2011 and January 2014. The study sample consisted of 71 patients with a lumbar spine surgical referral. The outcomes for the comparisons between lumbar decompression and spinal fusion were quality of life (evaluated through the EuroQoL 5D), pain (measured by the Numerical Rating Scale) and function (assessed through the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire) measured at baseline, and at 12 and 36 months after the surgical procedures. The definitions of recovery were established by the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). The baseline differences between the groups were analyzed by non-paired t-test, and the differences in instrument scores between time points, by generalized mixed models. The results were presented as mean values adjusted by the models and 95% confidence intervals. Results Concerning the surgical techniques, 22 patients were submitted to spinal fusion and 49 patients, to lumbar decompression. As for the comparisons of the findings before and after the surgical interventions, the MCID was achieved in all outcomes regarding quality of life, pain and function at both time points when compared to baseline scores Moreover, concerning the complication rates, only lumbar decompression presented a surgical rate of 4% (n = 3) for recurrence of lumbar disc hernia. Conclusion Patients with degenerative spinal pathologies present improvements in long-term outcomes of pain, function and quality of life which are clinically significant, no matter the surgical intervention.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-11-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162021000600766
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162021000600766
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1055/s-0041-1724083
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia v.56 n.6 2021
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)
instacron:SBOT
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)
instacron_str SBOT
institution SBOT
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rbo@sbot.org.br
_version_ 1752122363234746368