Outcome assessment in the treatment of rotator cuff tear: what is utilized in Brazil?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Assunção,Jorge Henrique
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Malavolta,Eduardo Angeli, Domingues,Vitor Rodrigues, Gracitelli,Mauro Emilio Conforto, Ferreira Neto,Arnaldo Amado
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162017000500561
Resumo: ABSTRACT This review evaluated the outcomes used in clinical studies involving rotator cuff tear published in the last decade in the two leading Brazilian orthopedic journals. A literature review was performed using the journals Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia and Acta Ortopédica Brasileira. It included all original clinical articles describing at least one outcome measured before or after any clinical or surgical intervention related to rotator cuff tear, published between 2006 and 2015. The authors evaluated range of motion, muscle strength, patient satisfaction, and tendon integrity and functional outcomes scores. There were 25 clinical studies published about rotator cuff in the two principal Brazilian orthopedic journals in the last decade, 20 case series (80%), one case-control (4%), and four cohorts (16%). Objective measures such as muscle strength, patient satisfaction, and evaluation of tendon integrity were little used. Range of motion measurements were performed in 52% of the articles. Evaluations of muscle strength and patient satisfaction were reported by 28% and 16% of the studies, respectively. Only 28% of the articles evaluated tendon integrity after surgery. Of these, 16% did so by magnetic resonance imaging and 12% by , ultrasonography. The most used scale was the UCLA, present in 92% of the articles, while the Constant-Murley appeared in 20%. Scales deemed reliable, with high internal consistency and good responsiveness, were rarely used.
id SBOT-2_add7bdcca9622898d3f57e423dc36c12
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0102-36162017000500561
network_acronym_str SBOT-2
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Outcome assessment in the treatment of rotator cuff tear: what is utilized in Brazil?ShoulderEvaluation of results of therapeutic interventionsRotator cuffABSTRACT This review evaluated the outcomes used in clinical studies involving rotator cuff tear published in the last decade in the two leading Brazilian orthopedic journals. A literature review was performed using the journals Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia and Acta Ortopédica Brasileira. It included all original clinical articles describing at least one outcome measured before or after any clinical or surgical intervention related to rotator cuff tear, published between 2006 and 2015. The authors evaluated range of motion, muscle strength, patient satisfaction, and tendon integrity and functional outcomes scores. There were 25 clinical studies published about rotator cuff in the two principal Brazilian orthopedic journals in the last decade, 20 case series (80%), one case-control (4%), and four cohorts (16%). Objective measures such as muscle strength, patient satisfaction, and evaluation of tendon integrity were little used. Range of motion measurements were performed in 52% of the articles. Evaluations of muscle strength and patient satisfaction were reported by 28% and 16% of the studies, respectively. Only 28% of the articles evaluated tendon integrity after surgery. Of these, 16% did so by magnetic resonance imaging and 12% by , ultrasonography. The most used scale was the UCLA, present in 92% of the articles, while the Constant-Murley appeared in 20%. Scales deemed reliable, with high internal consistency and good responsiveness, were rarely used.Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia2017-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162017000500561Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia v.52 n.5 2017reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)instacron:SBOT10.1016/j.rboe.2017.08.013info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAssunção,Jorge HenriqueMalavolta,Eduardo AngeliDomingues,Vitor RodriguesGracitelli,Mauro Emilio ConfortoFerreira Neto,Arnaldo Amadoeng2017-11-10T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-36162017000500561Revistahttp://www.rbo.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rbo@sbot.org.br1982-43780102-3616opendoar:2017-11-10T00:00Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Outcome assessment in the treatment of rotator cuff tear: what is utilized in Brazil?
title Outcome assessment in the treatment of rotator cuff tear: what is utilized in Brazil?
spellingShingle Outcome assessment in the treatment of rotator cuff tear: what is utilized in Brazil?
Assunção,Jorge Henrique
Shoulder
Evaluation of results of therapeutic interventions
Rotator cuff
title_short Outcome assessment in the treatment of rotator cuff tear: what is utilized in Brazil?
title_full Outcome assessment in the treatment of rotator cuff tear: what is utilized in Brazil?
title_fullStr Outcome assessment in the treatment of rotator cuff tear: what is utilized in Brazil?
title_full_unstemmed Outcome assessment in the treatment of rotator cuff tear: what is utilized in Brazil?
title_sort Outcome assessment in the treatment of rotator cuff tear: what is utilized in Brazil?
author Assunção,Jorge Henrique
author_facet Assunção,Jorge Henrique
Malavolta,Eduardo Angeli
Domingues,Vitor Rodrigues
Gracitelli,Mauro Emilio Conforto
Ferreira Neto,Arnaldo Amado
author_role author
author2 Malavolta,Eduardo Angeli
Domingues,Vitor Rodrigues
Gracitelli,Mauro Emilio Conforto
Ferreira Neto,Arnaldo Amado
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Assunção,Jorge Henrique
Malavolta,Eduardo Angeli
Domingues,Vitor Rodrigues
Gracitelli,Mauro Emilio Conforto
Ferreira Neto,Arnaldo Amado
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Shoulder
Evaluation of results of therapeutic interventions
Rotator cuff
topic Shoulder
Evaluation of results of therapeutic interventions
Rotator cuff
description ABSTRACT This review evaluated the outcomes used in clinical studies involving rotator cuff tear published in the last decade in the two leading Brazilian orthopedic journals. A literature review was performed using the journals Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia and Acta Ortopédica Brasileira. It included all original clinical articles describing at least one outcome measured before or after any clinical or surgical intervention related to rotator cuff tear, published between 2006 and 2015. The authors evaluated range of motion, muscle strength, patient satisfaction, and tendon integrity and functional outcomes scores. There were 25 clinical studies published about rotator cuff in the two principal Brazilian orthopedic journals in the last decade, 20 case series (80%), one case-control (4%), and four cohorts (16%). Objective measures such as muscle strength, patient satisfaction, and evaluation of tendon integrity were little used. Range of motion measurements were performed in 52% of the articles. Evaluations of muscle strength and patient satisfaction were reported by 28% and 16% of the studies, respectively. Only 28% of the articles evaluated tendon integrity after surgery. Of these, 16% did so by magnetic resonance imaging and 12% by , ultrasonography. The most used scale was the UCLA, present in 92% of the articles, while the Constant-Murley appeared in 20%. Scales deemed reliable, with high internal consistency and good responsiveness, were rarely used.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162017000500561
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162017000500561
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1016/j.rboe.2017.08.013
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia v.52 n.5 2017
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)
instacron:SBOT
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)
instacron_str SBOT
institution SBOT
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rbo@sbot.org.br
_version_ 1752122360924733440