Are the good functional results from arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff injuries maintained over the long term?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Miyazaki,Alberto Naoki
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Santos,Pedro Doneux, Silva,Luciana Andrade da, Sella,Guilherme do Val, Checchia,Sérgio Luiz, Yonamine,Alexandre Maris
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162016000100040
Resumo: ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the good and excellent functional results from arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears are maintained over the long term. METHODS: From the sample of the study conducted by our group in 2006, in which we evaluated the functional results from arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears, 35 patients were reassessed, 8 years after the first evaluation. The inclusion criteria were that these patients with massive rotator cuff tears operated by means of an arthroscopic technique, who participated in the previous study and achieved good or excellent outcomes according to the UCLA criteria. Patients whose results were not good or excellent in the first evaluation according to the UCLA criteria were excluded. RESULTS: Among the 35 patients reassessed, 91% of them continued to present good and excellent results (40% excellent and 51% good), while 3% presented fair results and 6% poor results. The time interval between the first and second evaluations was 8 years and the minimum length of follow-up since the immediate postoperative period was 9 years (range: 9-17 years), with an average of 11.4 years. CONCLUSION: The good and excellent results from arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears were mostly maintained (91%), with the same level of function and satisfaction, even though 8 years had passed since the first assessment, with a follow-up period averaging 11.4 years.
id SBOT-2_c74c1b3967b3610318d6758b3813a220
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0102-36162016000100040
network_acronym_str SBOT-2
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Are the good functional results from arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff injuries maintained over the long term?Rotator cuffArthroscopy/methodEvaluation studiesABSTRACT OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the good and excellent functional results from arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears are maintained over the long term. METHODS: From the sample of the study conducted by our group in 2006, in which we evaluated the functional results from arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears, 35 patients were reassessed, 8 years after the first evaluation. The inclusion criteria were that these patients with massive rotator cuff tears operated by means of an arthroscopic technique, who participated in the previous study and achieved good or excellent outcomes according to the UCLA criteria. Patients whose results were not good or excellent in the first evaluation according to the UCLA criteria were excluded. RESULTS: Among the 35 patients reassessed, 91% of them continued to present good and excellent results (40% excellent and 51% good), while 3% presented fair results and 6% poor results. The time interval between the first and second evaluations was 8 years and the minimum length of follow-up since the immediate postoperative period was 9 years (range: 9-17 years), with an average of 11.4 years. CONCLUSION: The good and excellent results from arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears were mostly maintained (91%), with the same level of function and satisfaction, even though 8 years had passed since the first assessment, with a follow-up period averaging 11.4 years.Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia2016-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162016000100040Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia v.51 n.1 2016reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)instacron:SBOT10.1016/j.rboe.2015.12.009info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMiyazaki,Alberto NaokiSantos,Pedro DoneuxSilva,Luciana Andrade daSella,Guilherme do ValChecchia,Sérgio LuizYonamine,Alexandre Mariseng2016-03-03T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-36162016000100040Revistahttp://www.rbo.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rbo@sbot.org.br1982-43780102-3616opendoar:2016-03-03T00:00Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Are the good functional results from arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff injuries maintained over the long term?
title Are the good functional results from arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff injuries maintained over the long term?
spellingShingle Are the good functional results from arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff injuries maintained over the long term?
Miyazaki,Alberto Naoki
Rotator cuff
Arthroscopy/method
Evaluation studies
title_short Are the good functional results from arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff injuries maintained over the long term?
title_full Are the good functional results from arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff injuries maintained over the long term?
title_fullStr Are the good functional results from arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff injuries maintained over the long term?
title_full_unstemmed Are the good functional results from arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff injuries maintained over the long term?
title_sort Are the good functional results from arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff injuries maintained over the long term?
author Miyazaki,Alberto Naoki
author_facet Miyazaki,Alberto Naoki
Santos,Pedro Doneux
Silva,Luciana Andrade da
Sella,Guilherme do Val
Checchia,Sérgio Luiz
Yonamine,Alexandre Maris
author_role author
author2 Santos,Pedro Doneux
Silva,Luciana Andrade da
Sella,Guilherme do Val
Checchia,Sérgio Luiz
Yonamine,Alexandre Maris
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Miyazaki,Alberto Naoki
Santos,Pedro Doneux
Silva,Luciana Andrade da
Sella,Guilherme do Val
Checchia,Sérgio Luiz
Yonamine,Alexandre Maris
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Rotator cuff
Arthroscopy/method
Evaluation studies
topic Rotator cuff
Arthroscopy/method
Evaluation studies
description ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the good and excellent functional results from arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears are maintained over the long term. METHODS: From the sample of the study conducted by our group in 2006, in which we evaluated the functional results from arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears, 35 patients were reassessed, 8 years after the first evaluation. The inclusion criteria were that these patients with massive rotator cuff tears operated by means of an arthroscopic technique, who participated in the previous study and achieved good or excellent outcomes according to the UCLA criteria. Patients whose results were not good or excellent in the first evaluation according to the UCLA criteria were excluded. RESULTS: Among the 35 patients reassessed, 91% of them continued to present good and excellent results (40% excellent and 51% good), while 3% presented fair results and 6% poor results. The time interval between the first and second evaluations was 8 years and the minimum length of follow-up since the immediate postoperative period was 9 years (range: 9-17 years), with an average of 11.4 years. CONCLUSION: The good and excellent results from arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears were mostly maintained (91%), with the same level of function and satisfaction, even though 8 years had passed since the first assessment, with a follow-up period averaging 11.4 years.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-02-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162016000100040
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162016000100040
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1016/j.rboe.2015.12.009
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia v.51 n.1 2016
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)
instacron:SBOT
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)
instacron_str SBOT
institution SBOT
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rbo@sbot.org.br
_version_ 1752122360065949696