Clinical Validation of the Glenoid Track Concept in Anterior Glenohumeral Instability
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162022000400612 |
Resumo: | Abstract Objective To evaluate the correlation of the glenoid track and glenoidal bone loss with the recurrence dislocation rate and the Rowe score. Methods Retrospective study that assessed the glenoid track and glenoidal bone loss through preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Patients undergoing primary arthroscopic repair of anterior Bankart were included. Patients with glenoidal bone loss greater than 21%, rotator cuff tear, scapular waist fracture, and posterior or multidirectional instability were not included. Rowe score were the primary outcome, and the recurrence rate was the secondary outcome. Results One hundred and two patients were included. Postoperative recurrent instability was reported by 8 patients (7.8%). Four patients (50%) in the group with recurrence presented glenoidal bone loss greater than 13.5% against 24 (25.5%) in the group without recurrence (p= 0.210), with a negative predictive value of 94.6%. Three patients (37.5%) in the recurrence group were considered off-track, against 13 (13.8%) in the group without recurrence (p= 0.109), with a negative predictive value of 94.2%. Patients with absolute glenoid track value ≤ 1.5 mm had worse results in relation to the recurrence group, with 6 patients (75%) presenting recurrence (p= 0.003). Conclusion Off-track injury and glenoidal bone loss greater than the subcritical are not related to the recurrence rate and Rowe score, despite the high negative predictive value. The cut of the absolute value of the glenoid track at 1.5 mm had a significant relationship with the recurrence rate. |
id |
SBOT-2_c8ee612282da5786640d92c89720555a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0102-36162022000400612 |
network_acronym_str |
SBOT-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Clinical Validation of the Glenoid Track Concept in Anterior Glenohumeral InstabilityBankart lesionsglenoid cavityshoulder dislocationAbstract Objective To evaluate the correlation of the glenoid track and glenoidal bone loss with the recurrence dislocation rate and the Rowe score. Methods Retrospective study that assessed the glenoid track and glenoidal bone loss through preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Patients undergoing primary arthroscopic repair of anterior Bankart were included. Patients with glenoidal bone loss greater than 21%, rotator cuff tear, scapular waist fracture, and posterior or multidirectional instability were not included. Rowe score were the primary outcome, and the recurrence rate was the secondary outcome. Results One hundred and two patients were included. Postoperative recurrent instability was reported by 8 patients (7.8%). Four patients (50%) in the group with recurrence presented glenoidal bone loss greater than 13.5% against 24 (25.5%) in the group without recurrence (p= 0.210), with a negative predictive value of 94.6%. Three patients (37.5%) in the recurrence group were considered off-track, against 13 (13.8%) in the group without recurrence (p= 0.109), with a negative predictive value of 94.2%. Patients with absolute glenoid track value ≤ 1.5 mm had worse results in relation to the recurrence group, with 6 patients (75%) presenting recurrence (p= 0.003). Conclusion Off-track injury and glenoidal bone loss greater than the subcritical are not related to the recurrence rate and Rowe score, despite the high negative predictive value. The cut of the absolute value of the glenoid track at 1.5 mm had a significant relationship with the recurrence rate.Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia2022-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162022000400612Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia v.57 n.4 2022reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)instacron:SBOT10.1055/s-0041-1741022info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGracitelli,Mauro Emilio ConfortoLobo,Frederico LafraiaMalavolta,Eduardo AngeliAssunção,Jorge HenriqueAndrade-Silva,Fernando Brandão deFerreira Neto,Arnaldo Amadoeng2022-08-26T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-36162022000400612Revistahttp://www.rbo.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rbo@sbot.org.br1982-43780102-3616opendoar:2022-08-26T00:00Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Clinical Validation of the Glenoid Track Concept in Anterior Glenohumeral Instability |
title |
Clinical Validation of the Glenoid Track Concept in Anterior Glenohumeral Instability |
spellingShingle |
Clinical Validation of the Glenoid Track Concept in Anterior Glenohumeral Instability Gracitelli,Mauro Emilio Conforto Bankart lesions glenoid cavity shoulder dislocation |
title_short |
Clinical Validation of the Glenoid Track Concept in Anterior Glenohumeral Instability |
title_full |
Clinical Validation of the Glenoid Track Concept in Anterior Glenohumeral Instability |
title_fullStr |
Clinical Validation of the Glenoid Track Concept in Anterior Glenohumeral Instability |
title_full_unstemmed |
Clinical Validation of the Glenoid Track Concept in Anterior Glenohumeral Instability |
title_sort |
Clinical Validation of the Glenoid Track Concept in Anterior Glenohumeral Instability |
author |
Gracitelli,Mauro Emilio Conforto |
author_facet |
Gracitelli,Mauro Emilio Conforto Lobo,Frederico Lafraia Malavolta,Eduardo Angeli Assunção,Jorge Henrique Andrade-Silva,Fernando Brandão de Ferreira Neto,Arnaldo Amado |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lobo,Frederico Lafraia Malavolta,Eduardo Angeli Assunção,Jorge Henrique Andrade-Silva,Fernando Brandão de Ferreira Neto,Arnaldo Amado |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Gracitelli,Mauro Emilio Conforto Lobo,Frederico Lafraia Malavolta,Eduardo Angeli Assunção,Jorge Henrique Andrade-Silva,Fernando Brandão de Ferreira Neto,Arnaldo Amado |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Bankart lesions glenoid cavity shoulder dislocation |
topic |
Bankart lesions glenoid cavity shoulder dislocation |
description |
Abstract Objective To evaluate the correlation of the glenoid track and glenoidal bone loss with the recurrence dislocation rate and the Rowe score. Methods Retrospective study that assessed the glenoid track and glenoidal bone loss through preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Patients undergoing primary arthroscopic repair of anterior Bankart were included. Patients with glenoidal bone loss greater than 21%, rotator cuff tear, scapular waist fracture, and posterior or multidirectional instability were not included. Rowe score were the primary outcome, and the recurrence rate was the secondary outcome. Results One hundred and two patients were included. Postoperative recurrent instability was reported by 8 patients (7.8%). Four patients (50%) in the group with recurrence presented glenoidal bone loss greater than 13.5% against 24 (25.5%) in the group without recurrence (p= 0.210), with a negative predictive value of 94.6%. Three patients (37.5%) in the recurrence group were considered off-track, against 13 (13.8%) in the group without recurrence (p= 0.109), with a negative predictive value of 94.2%. Patients with absolute glenoid track value ≤ 1.5 mm had worse results in relation to the recurrence group, with 6 patients (75%) presenting recurrence (p= 0.003). Conclusion Off-track injury and glenoidal bone loss greater than the subcritical are not related to the recurrence rate and Rowe score, despite the high negative predictive value. The cut of the absolute value of the glenoid track at 1.5 mm had a significant relationship with the recurrence rate. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-08-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162022000400612 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162022000400612 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1055/s-0041-1741022 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia v.57 n.4 2022 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT) instacron:SBOT |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT) |
instacron_str |
SBOT |
institution |
SBOT |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (SBOT) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rbo@sbot.org.br |
_version_ |
1752122363583922176 |