Molecular technique for detection and identification of Helicobacter pylori in clinical specimens: a comparison with the classical diagnostic method

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Nevoa,Jéssica C.
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Rodrigues,Roger Luiz, Menezes,Gabriela L., Lopes,Andressa R., Nascimento,Hemelly F., Santiago,Silvana B., Morelli,Marcos L., Barbosa,Monica S.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1676-24442017000100013
Resumo: ABSTRACT Introduction: Helicobacter pylori is a bacterium found in human epithelial cells of the gastrointestinal tract. Its infection is related to different diseases, such as chronic gastritis, peptic ulcers, gastric lymphoma and adenocarcinoma. The infection by H. pylori is present in more than a half of the world population. Objectives: To detect H. pylori and to compare the diagnostic methods of the rapid urease test (RUT) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Materials and methods: The study was conducted between April and July, 2015. For such, three biopsies were collected from each patient. Two were used for PCR and one for RUT. Results: A total of 85 samples were collected from patients undergoing endoscopy, with 56 (65.88%) females and 29 (34.11%) males. From the total samples subjected to RUT, 15 (17.64%) were positive and 70 (82.35%), negative. In PCR for detection of gene 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid (rRNA) of H. pylori, 66 (77.64%) presented positive results and 19 (22.35%), negative results. For the analysis of the presence of UreA gene in all samples, positive results were found in 70 (82.35%), and negative in 15 (17.64%). According to the results, RUT and the molecular test presented statistical difference. Conclusion: PCR is a useful method in the laboratorial routine to detect the presence of H. pylori in the stomach tissue, due to high sensitivity and specificity, but it requires a more careful analysis and standardization.
id SBP-1_766ba91b3536a711f1ba4695fd654388
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1676-24442017000100013
network_acronym_str SBP-1
network_name_str Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Molecular technique for detection and identification of Helicobacter pylori in clinical specimens: a comparison with the classical diagnostic methodbacteriapolymerase chain reactionureaseABSTRACT Introduction: Helicobacter pylori is a bacterium found in human epithelial cells of the gastrointestinal tract. Its infection is related to different diseases, such as chronic gastritis, peptic ulcers, gastric lymphoma and adenocarcinoma. The infection by H. pylori is present in more than a half of the world population. Objectives: To detect H. pylori and to compare the diagnostic methods of the rapid urease test (RUT) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Materials and methods: The study was conducted between April and July, 2015. For such, three biopsies were collected from each patient. Two were used for PCR and one for RUT. Results: A total of 85 samples were collected from patients undergoing endoscopy, with 56 (65.88%) females and 29 (34.11%) males. From the total samples subjected to RUT, 15 (17.64%) were positive and 70 (82.35%), negative. In PCR for detection of gene 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid (rRNA) of H. pylori, 66 (77.64%) presented positive results and 19 (22.35%), negative results. For the analysis of the presence of UreA gene in all samples, positive results were found in 70 (82.35%), and negative in 15 (17.64%). According to the results, RUT and the molecular test presented statistical difference. Conclusion: PCR is a useful method in the laboratorial routine to detect the presence of H. pylori in the stomach tissue, due to high sensitivity and specificity, but it requires a more careful analysis and standardization.Sociedade Brasileira de Patologia Clínica2017-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1676-24442017000100013Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial v.53 n.1 2017reponame:Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Patologia (SBP)instacron:SBP10.5935/1676-2444.20170003info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNevoa,Jéssica C.Rodrigues,Roger LuizMenezes,Gabriela L.Lopes,Andressa R.Nascimento,Hemelly F.Santiago,Silvana B.Morelli,Marcos L.Barbosa,Monica S.eng2017-03-14T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1676-24442017000100013Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/jbpmlhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||jbpml@sbpc.org.br1678-47741676-2444opendoar:2017-03-14T00:00Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Patologia (SBP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Molecular technique for detection and identification of Helicobacter pylori in clinical specimens: a comparison with the classical diagnostic method
title Molecular technique for detection and identification of Helicobacter pylori in clinical specimens: a comparison with the classical diagnostic method
spellingShingle Molecular technique for detection and identification of Helicobacter pylori in clinical specimens: a comparison with the classical diagnostic method
Nevoa,Jéssica C.
bacteria
polymerase chain reaction
urease
title_short Molecular technique for detection and identification of Helicobacter pylori in clinical specimens: a comparison with the classical diagnostic method
title_full Molecular technique for detection and identification of Helicobacter pylori in clinical specimens: a comparison with the classical diagnostic method
title_fullStr Molecular technique for detection and identification of Helicobacter pylori in clinical specimens: a comparison with the classical diagnostic method
title_full_unstemmed Molecular technique for detection and identification of Helicobacter pylori in clinical specimens: a comparison with the classical diagnostic method
title_sort Molecular technique for detection and identification of Helicobacter pylori in clinical specimens: a comparison with the classical diagnostic method
author Nevoa,Jéssica C.
author_facet Nevoa,Jéssica C.
Rodrigues,Roger Luiz
Menezes,Gabriela L.
Lopes,Andressa R.
Nascimento,Hemelly F.
Santiago,Silvana B.
Morelli,Marcos L.
Barbosa,Monica S.
author_role author
author2 Rodrigues,Roger Luiz
Menezes,Gabriela L.
Lopes,Andressa R.
Nascimento,Hemelly F.
Santiago,Silvana B.
Morelli,Marcos L.
Barbosa,Monica S.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Nevoa,Jéssica C.
Rodrigues,Roger Luiz
Menezes,Gabriela L.
Lopes,Andressa R.
Nascimento,Hemelly F.
Santiago,Silvana B.
Morelli,Marcos L.
Barbosa,Monica S.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv bacteria
polymerase chain reaction
urease
topic bacteria
polymerase chain reaction
urease
description ABSTRACT Introduction: Helicobacter pylori is a bacterium found in human epithelial cells of the gastrointestinal tract. Its infection is related to different diseases, such as chronic gastritis, peptic ulcers, gastric lymphoma and adenocarcinoma. The infection by H. pylori is present in more than a half of the world population. Objectives: To detect H. pylori and to compare the diagnostic methods of the rapid urease test (RUT) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Materials and methods: The study was conducted between April and July, 2015. For such, three biopsies were collected from each patient. Two were used for PCR and one for RUT. Results: A total of 85 samples were collected from patients undergoing endoscopy, with 56 (65.88%) females and 29 (34.11%) males. From the total samples subjected to RUT, 15 (17.64%) were positive and 70 (82.35%), negative. In PCR for detection of gene 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid (rRNA) of H. pylori, 66 (77.64%) presented positive results and 19 (22.35%), negative results. For the analysis of the presence of UreA gene in all samples, positive results were found in 70 (82.35%), and negative in 15 (17.64%). According to the results, RUT and the molecular test presented statistical difference. Conclusion: PCR is a useful method in the laboratorial routine to detect the presence of H. pylori in the stomach tissue, due to high sensitivity and specificity, but it requires a more careful analysis and standardization.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-02-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1676-24442017000100013
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1676-24442017000100013
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.5935/1676-2444.20170003
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv
Sociedade Brasileira de Patologia Clínica
publisher.none.fl_str_mv
Sociedade Brasileira de Patologia Clínica
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial v.53 n.1 2017
reponame:Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Patologia (SBP)
instacron:SBP
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Patologia (SBP)
instacron_str SBP
institution SBP
reponame_str Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial (Online)
collection Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Patologia (SBP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||jbpml@sbpc.org.br
_version_ 1752122296724619264