Sample transport validation: experience of a medium-sized laboratory

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lopes,Vivianne A.
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Silveira,Juliana S., Santos,Letícia B. S., Nunes,Missilene da Conceição P., Faria,Manuel S.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1676-24442018000500306
Resumo: ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION: The adequacy of biological samples is a critical and important item in the clinical laboratory, so that reliable results can be obtained for patients. OBJECTIVE: To ensure integrity and stability of biological samples during the transport process. METHOD: Concurrent validation was carried out – in parallel with the production process and distribution of the product, from January to March 2017. The blood samples were packaged primarily in tube racks, and those of urine, feces and microbiological materials were packed in plastic bags. Materials were wrapped in a blanket of absorbent material to ensure temperature integrity and to avoid possible material losses. Thermal bags were the containers used to carry the samples. There were five transport routes, with two daily routes for each collection unit. A recommendation of the number of ice packs, predefined by the laboratory, was followed. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: In the first month, the pre-established temperatures (blood: 10°C to 22°C/urine-feces: 2°C to 8°C) were not reached until arrival at the central laboratory, and the amount of ice in each bag was gradually increased, daily, until reaching the ideal temperature, in all collection units and the central. Transport routes were changed three times in the most distant units. Materials that arrived outside specifications were processed with restrictions, and results were evaluated by the professional responsible for the release. After these modifications, the temperature records of the biological materials were in accordance with the current legislation and the defined specifications, thus validating the process.
id SBP-1_b23d1128ffbc3f348b23bd1b11268c39
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1676-24442018000500306
network_acronym_str SBP-1
network_name_str Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Sample transport validation: experience of a medium-sized laboratoryspecimen handlingvalidation studiesclinical laboratory techniquessubstances, products and materials transportationABSTRACT INTRODUCTION: The adequacy of biological samples is a critical and important item in the clinical laboratory, so that reliable results can be obtained for patients. OBJECTIVE: To ensure integrity and stability of biological samples during the transport process. METHOD: Concurrent validation was carried out – in parallel with the production process and distribution of the product, from January to March 2017. The blood samples were packaged primarily in tube racks, and those of urine, feces and microbiological materials were packed in plastic bags. Materials were wrapped in a blanket of absorbent material to ensure temperature integrity and to avoid possible material losses. Thermal bags were the containers used to carry the samples. There were five transport routes, with two daily routes for each collection unit. A recommendation of the number of ice packs, predefined by the laboratory, was followed. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: In the first month, the pre-established temperatures (blood: 10°C to 22°C/urine-feces: 2°C to 8°C) were not reached until arrival at the central laboratory, and the amount of ice in each bag was gradually increased, daily, until reaching the ideal temperature, in all collection units and the central. Transport routes were changed three times in the most distant units. Materials that arrived outside specifications were processed with restrictions, and results were evaluated by the professional responsible for the release. After these modifications, the temperature records of the biological materials were in accordance with the current legislation and the defined specifications, thus validating the process.Sociedade Brasileira de Patologia Clínica2018-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1676-24442018000500306Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial v.54 n.5 2018reponame:Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Patologia (SBP)instacron:SBP10.5935/1676-2444.20180051info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLopes,Vivianne A.Silveira,Juliana S.Santos,Letícia B. S.Nunes,Missilene da Conceição P.Faria,Manuel S.eng2018-12-03T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1676-24442018000500306Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/jbpmlhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||jbpml@sbpc.org.br1678-47741676-2444opendoar:2018-12-03T00:00Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Patologia (SBP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Sample transport validation: experience of a medium-sized laboratory
title Sample transport validation: experience of a medium-sized laboratory
spellingShingle Sample transport validation: experience of a medium-sized laboratory
Lopes,Vivianne A.
specimen handling
validation studies
clinical laboratory techniques
substances, products and materials transportation
title_short Sample transport validation: experience of a medium-sized laboratory
title_full Sample transport validation: experience of a medium-sized laboratory
title_fullStr Sample transport validation: experience of a medium-sized laboratory
title_full_unstemmed Sample transport validation: experience of a medium-sized laboratory
title_sort Sample transport validation: experience of a medium-sized laboratory
author Lopes,Vivianne A.
author_facet Lopes,Vivianne A.
Silveira,Juliana S.
Santos,Letícia B. S.
Nunes,Missilene da Conceição P.
Faria,Manuel S.
author_role author
author2 Silveira,Juliana S.
Santos,Letícia B. S.
Nunes,Missilene da Conceição P.
Faria,Manuel S.
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lopes,Vivianne A.
Silveira,Juliana S.
Santos,Letícia B. S.
Nunes,Missilene da Conceição P.
Faria,Manuel S.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv specimen handling
validation studies
clinical laboratory techniques
substances, products and materials transportation
topic specimen handling
validation studies
clinical laboratory techniques
substances, products and materials transportation
description ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION: The adequacy of biological samples is a critical and important item in the clinical laboratory, so that reliable results can be obtained for patients. OBJECTIVE: To ensure integrity and stability of biological samples during the transport process. METHOD: Concurrent validation was carried out – in parallel with the production process and distribution of the product, from January to March 2017. The blood samples were packaged primarily in tube racks, and those of urine, feces and microbiological materials were packed in plastic bags. Materials were wrapped in a blanket of absorbent material to ensure temperature integrity and to avoid possible material losses. Thermal bags were the containers used to carry the samples. There were five transport routes, with two daily routes for each collection unit. A recommendation of the number of ice packs, predefined by the laboratory, was followed. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: In the first month, the pre-established temperatures (blood: 10°C to 22°C/urine-feces: 2°C to 8°C) were not reached until arrival at the central laboratory, and the amount of ice in each bag was gradually increased, daily, until reaching the ideal temperature, in all collection units and the central. Transport routes were changed three times in the most distant units. Materials that arrived outside specifications were processed with restrictions, and results were evaluated by the professional responsible for the release. After these modifications, the temperature records of the biological materials were in accordance with the current legislation and the defined specifications, thus validating the process.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-10-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1676-24442018000500306
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1676-24442018000500306
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.5935/1676-2444.20180051
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv
Sociedade Brasileira de Patologia Clínica
publisher.none.fl_str_mv
Sociedade Brasileira de Patologia Clínica
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial v.54 n.5 2018
reponame:Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Patologia (SBP)
instacron:SBP
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Patologia (SBP)
instacron_str SBP
institution SBP
reponame_str Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial (Online)
collection Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Patologia (SBP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||jbpml@sbpc.org.br
_version_ 1752122297148243968