Evaluation of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (VITEK-MS) compared to the ANC card (VITEK 2) for the identification of clinically significant anaerobes
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1676-24442018000400206 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Introduction: The identification of anaerobic bacteria by conventional methods employed in clinical laboratories requires a lot of work and a long response time [turnaround time (TAT)]. Matrix assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) is an accurate, rapid and inexpensive technique with promising results for bacterial identification. Objective: To evaluate the MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (VITEK-MS, bioMérieux, France) compared to the ANC card (VITEK 2, bioMérieux, France) for the identification of anaerobes, and also veriying the cost variation between both methodologies. Methods: 421 anaerobes were concomitantly identified by ANC (VITEK 2) and MALDI-TOF (VITEK MS). The conflicting results or those presenting low differentiation of the species were subjected to the 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid (rRNA) sequencing. Results: Thirty-five strains were not identified by ANC (VITEK 2), and only one isolate was not identified by MALDI-TOF (VITEK MS). From the 386 anaerobes identified by the two methodologies, 97% agreement was observed on the identification of genus and species between the methodologies. Thirteen (3%) isolates were submitted to 16S sequencing. The agreement observed was 70% using ANC (VITEK 2) using 92% by MALDI-TOF (VITEK MS). Conclusion: Both methodologies showed an excellent performance for the identification of the strains tested with great differences in relation to cost-benefit. MALDI-TOF MS allowed 35 additional identifications and a saving of BRL$ 7,786 with the release of culture positive result five days ahead of the ANC (VITEK 2). TAT reduction may contribute to a successful clinical resolution. |
id |
SBP-1_b5d1959e0a28d1d370c6620c6ea8ec90 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1676-24442018000400206 |
network_acronym_str |
SBP-1 |
network_name_str |
Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Evaluation of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (VITEK-MS) compared to the ANC card (VITEK 2) for the identification of clinically significant anaerobesmatrix assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometryclinical laboratory techniquesbacteroides infectionsanaerobic bacteriaClostridium infectionsABSTRACT Introduction: The identification of anaerobic bacteria by conventional methods employed in clinical laboratories requires a lot of work and a long response time [turnaround time (TAT)]. Matrix assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) is an accurate, rapid and inexpensive technique with promising results for bacterial identification. Objective: To evaluate the MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (VITEK-MS, bioMérieux, France) compared to the ANC card (VITEK 2, bioMérieux, France) for the identification of anaerobes, and also veriying the cost variation between both methodologies. Methods: 421 anaerobes were concomitantly identified by ANC (VITEK 2) and MALDI-TOF (VITEK MS). The conflicting results or those presenting low differentiation of the species were subjected to the 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid (rRNA) sequencing. Results: Thirty-five strains were not identified by ANC (VITEK 2), and only one isolate was not identified by MALDI-TOF (VITEK MS). From the 386 anaerobes identified by the two methodologies, 97% agreement was observed on the identification of genus and species between the methodologies. Thirteen (3%) isolates were submitted to 16S sequencing. The agreement observed was 70% using ANC (VITEK 2) using 92% by MALDI-TOF (VITEK MS). Conclusion: Both methodologies showed an excellent performance for the identification of the strains tested with great differences in relation to cost-benefit. MALDI-TOF MS allowed 35 additional identifications and a saving of BRL$ 7,786 with the release of culture positive result five days ahead of the ANC (VITEK 2). TAT reduction may contribute to a successful clinical resolution.Sociedade Brasileira de Patologia Clínica2018-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1676-24442018000400206Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial v.54 n.4 2018reponame:Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Patologia (SBP)instacron:SBP10.5935/1676-2444.20180036info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTsukimoto,Eliane R.Rossi,Fláviaeng2018-09-20T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1676-24442018000400206Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/jbpmlhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||jbpml@sbpc.org.br1678-47741676-2444opendoar:2018-09-20T00:00Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Patologia (SBP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (VITEK-MS) compared to the ANC card (VITEK 2) for the identification of clinically significant anaerobes |
title |
Evaluation of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (VITEK-MS) compared to the ANC card (VITEK 2) for the identification of clinically significant anaerobes |
spellingShingle |
Evaluation of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (VITEK-MS) compared to the ANC card (VITEK 2) for the identification of clinically significant anaerobes Tsukimoto,Eliane R. matrix assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry clinical laboratory techniques bacteroides infections anaerobic bacteria Clostridium infections |
title_short |
Evaluation of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (VITEK-MS) compared to the ANC card (VITEK 2) for the identification of clinically significant anaerobes |
title_full |
Evaluation of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (VITEK-MS) compared to the ANC card (VITEK 2) for the identification of clinically significant anaerobes |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (VITEK-MS) compared to the ANC card (VITEK 2) for the identification of clinically significant anaerobes |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (VITEK-MS) compared to the ANC card (VITEK 2) for the identification of clinically significant anaerobes |
title_sort |
Evaluation of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (VITEK-MS) compared to the ANC card (VITEK 2) for the identification of clinically significant anaerobes |
author |
Tsukimoto,Eliane R. |
author_facet |
Tsukimoto,Eliane R. Rossi,Flávia |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Rossi,Flávia |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Tsukimoto,Eliane R. Rossi,Flávia |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
matrix assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry clinical laboratory techniques bacteroides infections anaerobic bacteria Clostridium infections |
topic |
matrix assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry clinical laboratory techniques bacteroides infections anaerobic bacteria Clostridium infections |
description |
ABSTRACT Introduction: The identification of anaerobic bacteria by conventional methods employed in clinical laboratories requires a lot of work and a long response time [turnaround time (TAT)]. Matrix assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) is an accurate, rapid and inexpensive technique with promising results for bacterial identification. Objective: To evaluate the MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (VITEK-MS, bioMérieux, France) compared to the ANC card (VITEK 2, bioMérieux, France) for the identification of anaerobes, and also veriying the cost variation between both methodologies. Methods: 421 anaerobes were concomitantly identified by ANC (VITEK 2) and MALDI-TOF (VITEK MS). The conflicting results or those presenting low differentiation of the species were subjected to the 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid (rRNA) sequencing. Results: Thirty-five strains were not identified by ANC (VITEK 2), and only one isolate was not identified by MALDI-TOF (VITEK MS). From the 386 anaerobes identified by the two methodologies, 97% agreement was observed on the identification of genus and species between the methodologies. Thirteen (3%) isolates were submitted to 16S sequencing. The agreement observed was 70% using ANC (VITEK 2) using 92% by MALDI-TOF (VITEK MS). Conclusion: Both methodologies showed an excellent performance for the identification of the strains tested with great differences in relation to cost-benefit. MALDI-TOF MS allowed 35 additional identifications and a saving of BRL$ 7,786 with the release of culture positive result five days ahead of the ANC (VITEK 2). TAT reduction may contribute to a successful clinical resolution. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-07-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1676-24442018000400206 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1676-24442018000400206 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.5935/1676-2444.20180036 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Patologia Clínica |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Patologia Clínica |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial v.54 n.4 2018 reponame:Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Patologia (SBP) instacron:SBP |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Patologia (SBP) |
instacron_str |
SBP |
institution |
SBP |
reponame_str |
Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial (Online) |
collection |
Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Patologia (SBP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||jbpml@sbpc.org.br |
_version_ |
1752122297125175296 |