Child development in primary care: a surveillance proposal
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2016 |
Other Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Jornal de Pediatria (Online) |
Download full: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0021-75572016000600505 |
Summary: | Abstract Objective: To evaluate a child development surveillance tool proposal to be used in primary care, with simultaneous use of the Denver II scale. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study of 282 infants aged up to 36 months, enrolled in a public daycare in a countryside community in Rio Grande do Sul/Brazil. Child development was assessed using the surveillance tool and the Denver II scale. Results: The prevalence of probable developmental delay was 53%; most of these cases were in the alert group and 24% had normal development, but with risk factors. At the Denver scale, the prevalence of suspected developmental delay was 32%. When risk factors and sociodemographic variables were assessed, no significant difference was observed. Conclusion: The evaluation of this surveillance tool resulted in objective and comparable data, which were adequate for a screening test. It is easily applicable as a screening tool, even though it was originally designed as a surveillance tool. The inclusion of risk factors to the scoring system is an innovation that allows for the identification of children with suspected delay in addition to developmental milestones, although the definition of parameters and choice of indicators should be thoroughly studied. |
id |
SBPE-1_642a11e7871e73d7067045ebc7e86481 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0021-75572016000600505 |
network_acronym_str |
SBPE-1 |
network_name_str |
Jornal de Pediatria (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Child development in primary care: a surveillance proposalChild developmentScreeningRisk factorsAbstract Objective: To evaluate a child development surveillance tool proposal to be used in primary care, with simultaneous use of the Denver II scale. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study of 282 infants aged up to 36 months, enrolled in a public daycare in a countryside community in Rio Grande do Sul/Brazil. Child development was assessed using the surveillance tool and the Denver II scale. Results: The prevalence of probable developmental delay was 53%; most of these cases were in the alert group and 24% had normal development, but with risk factors. At the Denver scale, the prevalence of suspected developmental delay was 32%. When risk factors and sociodemographic variables were assessed, no significant difference was observed. Conclusion: The evaluation of this surveillance tool resulted in objective and comparable data, which were adequate for a screening test. It is easily applicable as a screening tool, even though it was originally designed as a surveillance tool. The inclusion of risk factors to the scoring system is an innovation that allows for the identification of children with suspected delay in addition to developmental milestones, although the definition of parameters and choice of indicators should be thoroughly studied.Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria2016-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0021-75572016000600505Jornal de Pediatria v.92 n.5 2016reponame:Jornal de Pediatria (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria (SBP)instacron:SBPE10.1016/j.jped.2015.12.006info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCoelho,RenatoFerreira,José PauloSukiennik,RicardoHalpern,Ricardoeng2016-10-11T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0021-75572016000600505Revistahttp://www.jped.com.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||jped@jped.com.br1678-47820021-7557opendoar:2016-10-11T00:00Jornal de Pediatria (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria (SBP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Child development in primary care: a surveillance proposal |
title |
Child development in primary care: a surveillance proposal |
spellingShingle |
Child development in primary care: a surveillance proposal Coelho,Renato Child development Screening Risk factors |
title_short |
Child development in primary care: a surveillance proposal |
title_full |
Child development in primary care: a surveillance proposal |
title_fullStr |
Child development in primary care: a surveillance proposal |
title_full_unstemmed |
Child development in primary care: a surveillance proposal |
title_sort |
Child development in primary care: a surveillance proposal |
author |
Coelho,Renato |
author_facet |
Coelho,Renato Ferreira,José Paulo Sukiennik,Ricardo Halpern,Ricardo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ferreira,José Paulo Sukiennik,Ricardo Halpern,Ricardo |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Coelho,Renato Ferreira,José Paulo Sukiennik,Ricardo Halpern,Ricardo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Child development Screening Risk factors |
topic |
Child development Screening Risk factors |
description |
Abstract Objective: To evaluate a child development surveillance tool proposal to be used in primary care, with simultaneous use of the Denver II scale. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study of 282 infants aged up to 36 months, enrolled in a public daycare in a countryside community in Rio Grande do Sul/Brazil. Child development was assessed using the surveillance tool and the Denver II scale. Results: The prevalence of probable developmental delay was 53%; most of these cases were in the alert group and 24% had normal development, but with risk factors. At the Denver scale, the prevalence of suspected developmental delay was 32%. When risk factors and sociodemographic variables were assessed, no significant difference was observed. Conclusion: The evaluation of this surveillance tool resulted in objective and comparable data, which were adequate for a screening test. It is easily applicable as a screening tool, even though it was originally designed as a surveillance tool. The inclusion of risk factors to the scoring system is an innovation that allows for the identification of children with suspected delay in addition to developmental milestones, although the definition of parameters and choice of indicators should be thoroughly studied. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-10-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0021-75572016000600505 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0021-75572016000600505 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1016/j.jped.2015.12.006 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Jornal de Pediatria v.92 n.5 2016 reponame:Jornal de Pediatria (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria (SBP) instacron:SBPE |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria (SBP) |
instacron_str |
SBPE |
institution |
SBPE |
reponame_str |
Jornal de Pediatria (Online) |
collection |
Jornal de Pediatria (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Jornal de Pediatria (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria (SBP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||jped@jped.com.br |
_version_ |
1752122320857595904 |