Child development in primary care: a surveillance proposal

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Coelho,Renato
Publication Date: 2016
Other Authors: Ferreira,José Paulo, Sukiennik,Ricardo, Halpern,Ricardo
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Jornal de Pediatria (Online)
Download full: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0021-75572016000600505
Summary: Abstract Objective: To evaluate a child development surveillance tool proposal to be used in primary care, with simultaneous use of the Denver II scale. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study of 282 infants aged up to 36 months, enrolled in a public daycare in a countryside community in Rio Grande do Sul/Brazil. Child development was assessed using the surveillance tool and the Denver II scale. Results: The prevalence of probable developmental delay was 53%; most of these cases were in the alert group and 24% had normal development, but with risk factors. At the Denver scale, the prevalence of suspected developmental delay was 32%. When risk factors and sociodemographic variables were assessed, no significant difference was observed. Conclusion: The evaluation of this surveillance tool resulted in objective and comparable data, which were adequate for a screening test. It is easily applicable as a screening tool, even though it was originally designed as a surveillance tool. The inclusion of risk factors to the scoring system is an innovation that allows for the identification of children with suspected delay in addition to developmental milestones, although the definition of parameters and choice of indicators should be thoroughly studied.
id SBPE-1_642a11e7871e73d7067045ebc7e86481
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0021-75572016000600505
network_acronym_str SBPE-1
network_name_str Jornal de Pediatria (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Child development in primary care: a surveillance proposalChild developmentScreeningRisk factorsAbstract Objective: To evaluate a child development surveillance tool proposal to be used in primary care, with simultaneous use of the Denver II scale. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study of 282 infants aged up to 36 months, enrolled in a public daycare in a countryside community in Rio Grande do Sul/Brazil. Child development was assessed using the surveillance tool and the Denver II scale. Results: The prevalence of probable developmental delay was 53%; most of these cases were in the alert group and 24% had normal development, but with risk factors. At the Denver scale, the prevalence of suspected developmental delay was 32%. When risk factors and sociodemographic variables were assessed, no significant difference was observed. Conclusion: The evaluation of this surveillance tool resulted in objective and comparable data, which were adequate for a screening test. It is easily applicable as a screening tool, even though it was originally designed as a surveillance tool. The inclusion of risk factors to the scoring system is an innovation that allows for the identification of children with suspected delay in addition to developmental milestones, although the definition of parameters and choice of indicators should be thoroughly studied.Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria2016-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0021-75572016000600505Jornal de Pediatria v.92 n.5 2016reponame:Jornal de Pediatria (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria (SBP)instacron:SBPE10.1016/j.jped.2015.12.006info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCoelho,RenatoFerreira,José PauloSukiennik,RicardoHalpern,Ricardoeng2016-10-11T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0021-75572016000600505Revistahttp://www.jped.com.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||jped@jped.com.br1678-47820021-7557opendoar:2016-10-11T00:00Jornal de Pediatria (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria (SBP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Child development in primary care: a surveillance proposal
title Child development in primary care: a surveillance proposal
spellingShingle Child development in primary care: a surveillance proposal
Coelho,Renato
Child development
Screening
Risk factors
title_short Child development in primary care: a surveillance proposal
title_full Child development in primary care: a surveillance proposal
title_fullStr Child development in primary care: a surveillance proposal
title_full_unstemmed Child development in primary care: a surveillance proposal
title_sort Child development in primary care: a surveillance proposal
author Coelho,Renato
author_facet Coelho,Renato
Ferreira,José Paulo
Sukiennik,Ricardo
Halpern,Ricardo
author_role author
author2 Ferreira,José Paulo
Sukiennik,Ricardo
Halpern,Ricardo
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Coelho,Renato
Ferreira,José Paulo
Sukiennik,Ricardo
Halpern,Ricardo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Child development
Screening
Risk factors
topic Child development
Screening
Risk factors
description Abstract Objective: To evaluate a child development surveillance tool proposal to be used in primary care, with simultaneous use of the Denver II scale. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study of 282 infants aged up to 36 months, enrolled in a public daycare in a countryside community in Rio Grande do Sul/Brazil. Child development was assessed using the surveillance tool and the Denver II scale. Results: The prevalence of probable developmental delay was 53%; most of these cases were in the alert group and 24% had normal development, but with risk factors. At the Denver scale, the prevalence of suspected developmental delay was 32%. When risk factors and sociodemographic variables were assessed, no significant difference was observed. Conclusion: The evaluation of this surveillance tool resulted in objective and comparable data, which were adequate for a screening test. It is easily applicable as a screening tool, even though it was originally designed as a surveillance tool. The inclusion of risk factors to the scoring system is an innovation that allows for the identification of children with suspected delay in addition to developmental milestones, although the definition of parameters and choice of indicators should be thoroughly studied.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-10-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0021-75572016000600505
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0021-75572016000600505
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1016/j.jped.2015.12.006
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Jornal de Pediatria v.92 n.5 2016
reponame:Jornal de Pediatria (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria (SBP)
instacron:SBPE
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria (SBP)
instacron_str SBPE
institution SBPE
reponame_str Jornal de Pediatria (Online)
collection Jornal de Pediatria (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Jornal de Pediatria (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria (SBP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||jped@jped.com.br
_version_ 1752122320857595904