Tracheostomy practices in children on mechanical ventilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Jornal de Pediatria (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0021-75572022000200126 |
Resumo: | Abstract Objective: To evaluate current practices of tracheostomy in children regarding the ideal timing of tracheostomy placement, complications, indications, mortality, and success in decannulation. Source of data: The authors searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and complemented by manual search. The guidelines of PRISMA and MOOSE were applied. The quality of the included studies was evaluated with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Information extracted included patients’ characteristics, outcomes, time to tracheostomy, and associated complications. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were computed using theMantel-Haenszel method. Synthesis of data: Sixty-six articles were included in the qualitative analysis, and 8 were included in the meta-analysis about timing for tracheostomy placement. The risk ratio for “death in hospital outcome” did not show any benefit from performing a tracheostomy before or after 14 days of mechanical ventilation (p = 0.49). The early tracheostomy before 14 days had a great impact on the days of mechanical ventilation (-26 days in mean difference, p < 0.00001). The authors also found a great reduction in hospital length of stay (-31.4 days, p < 0.008). For the days in PICU, the mean reduction was of 14.7 days (p < 0.007). Conclusions: The meta-analysis suggests that tracheostomy performed in the first 14 days of ventilation can reduce the time spent on the ventilator, and the length of stay in the hospital, with no effect on mortality. The decision to perform a tracheostomy early or late may be more dependent on the baseline disease than on the time spent on ventilation. |
id |
SBPE-1_7476c358947c30effffc443b5989aecc |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0021-75572022000200126 |
network_acronym_str |
SBPE-1 |
network_name_str |
Jornal de Pediatria (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Tracheostomy practices in children on mechanical ventilation: a systematic review and meta-analysisTracheostomyMechanical ventilationPediatricsReviewMeta-analysisAbstract Objective: To evaluate current practices of tracheostomy in children regarding the ideal timing of tracheostomy placement, complications, indications, mortality, and success in decannulation. Source of data: The authors searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and complemented by manual search. The guidelines of PRISMA and MOOSE were applied. The quality of the included studies was evaluated with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Information extracted included patients’ characteristics, outcomes, time to tracheostomy, and associated complications. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were computed using theMantel-Haenszel method. Synthesis of data: Sixty-six articles were included in the qualitative analysis, and 8 were included in the meta-analysis about timing for tracheostomy placement. The risk ratio for “death in hospital outcome” did not show any benefit from performing a tracheostomy before or after 14 days of mechanical ventilation (p = 0.49). The early tracheostomy before 14 days had a great impact on the days of mechanical ventilation (-26 days in mean difference, p < 0.00001). The authors also found a great reduction in hospital length of stay (-31.4 days, p < 0.008). For the days in PICU, the mean reduction was of 14.7 days (p < 0.007). Conclusions: The meta-analysis suggests that tracheostomy performed in the first 14 days of ventilation can reduce the time spent on the ventilator, and the length of stay in the hospital, with no effect on mortality. The decision to perform a tracheostomy early or late may be more dependent on the baseline disease than on the time spent on ventilation.Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria2022-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0021-75572022000200126Jornal de Pediatria v.98 n.2 2022reponame:Jornal de Pediatria (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria (SBP)instacron:SBPE10.1016/j.jped.2021.07.004info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAraujo,Orlei Ribeiro deAzevedo,Rafael TeixeiraOliveira,Felipe Rezende Caino deColleti Junior,Joséeng2022-04-18T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0021-75572022000200126Revistahttp://www.jped.com.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||jped@jped.com.br1678-47820021-7557opendoar:2022-04-18T00:00Jornal de Pediatria (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria (SBP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Tracheostomy practices in children on mechanical ventilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title |
Tracheostomy practices in children on mechanical ventilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
spellingShingle |
Tracheostomy practices in children on mechanical ventilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis Araujo,Orlei Ribeiro de Tracheostomy Mechanical ventilation Pediatrics Review Meta-analysis |
title_short |
Tracheostomy practices in children on mechanical ventilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full |
Tracheostomy practices in children on mechanical ventilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr |
Tracheostomy practices in children on mechanical ventilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Tracheostomy practices in children on mechanical ventilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort |
Tracheostomy practices in children on mechanical ventilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
author |
Araujo,Orlei Ribeiro de |
author_facet |
Araujo,Orlei Ribeiro de Azevedo,Rafael Teixeira Oliveira,Felipe Rezende Caino de Colleti Junior,José |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Azevedo,Rafael Teixeira Oliveira,Felipe Rezende Caino de Colleti Junior,José |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Araujo,Orlei Ribeiro de Azevedo,Rafael Teixeira Oliveira,Felipe Rezende Caino de Colleti Junior,José |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Tracheostomy Mechanical ventilation Pediatrics Review Meta-analysis |
topic |
Tracheostomy Mechanical ventilation Pediatrics Review Meta-analysis |
description |
Abstract Objective: To evaluate current practices of tracheostomy in children regarding the ideal timing of tracheostomy placement, complications, indications, mortality, and success in decannulation. Source of data: The authors searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and complemented by manual search. The guidelines of PRISMA and MOOSE were applied. The quality of the included studies was evaluated with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Information extracted included patients’ characteristics, outcomes, time to tracheostomy, and associated complications. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were computed using theMantel-Haenszel method. Synthesis of data: Sixty-six articles were included in the qualitative analysis, and 8 were included in the meta-analysis about timing for tracheostomy placement. The risk ratio for “death in hospital outcome” did not show any benefit from performing a tracheostomy before or after 14 days of mechanical ventilation (p = 0.49). The early tracheostomy before 14 days had a great impact on the days of mechanical ventilation (-26 days in mean difference, p < 0.00001). The authors also found a great reduction in hospital length of stay (-31.4 days, p < 0.008). For the days in PICU, the mean reduction was of 14.7 days (p < 0.007). Conclusions: The meta-analysis suggests that tracheostomy performed in the first 14 days of ventilation can reduce the time spent on the ventilator, and the length of stay in the hospital, with no effect on mortality. The decision to perform a tracheostomy early or late may be more dependent on the baseline disease than on the time spent on ventilation. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-04-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0021-75572022000200126 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0021-75572022000200126 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1016/j.jped.2021.07.004 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Jornal de Pediatria v.98 n.2 2022 reponame:Jornal de Pediatria (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria (SBP) instacron:SBPE |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria (SBP) |
instacron_str |
SBPE |
institution |
SBPE |
reponame_str |
Jornal de Pediatria (Online) |
collection |
Jornal de Pediatria (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Jornal de Pediatria (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria (SBP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||jped@jped.com.br |
_version_ |
1752122323247300608 |