Looking at neonatal facial features of pain: do health and non-health professionals differ?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Soares,Juliana do Carmo Azevedo
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Barros,Marina Carvalho de Moraes, Silva,Giselle Valério Teixeira da, Carlini,Lucas Pereira, Heiderich,Tatiany Marcondes, Orsi,Rafael Nobre, Balda,Rita de Cássia Xavier, Silva,Pedro Augusto Santos Orona, Thomaz,Carlos Eduardo, Guinsburg,Ruth
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Jornal de Pediatria (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0021-75572022000400406
Resumo: Abstract Objective: To analyze the regions that trigger the attention of adults’ gaze when assessing pain in newborn infants’ pictures and to verify if there are differences between health and non-health professionals. Method: Experimental study with 84 health professionals and 59 non-health professionals, who evaluated two images of 10 neonates, one at rest and the other during a painful procedure. Each image was shown for 7 seconds on a computer screen, while eye movements were tracked by the Tobii TX300 EyeTracker. After evaluating each image, participants gave a score from 0 (absent pain) to 10 (maximum pain), according to their perception of neonatal pain. For each image, the number and total time of gaze fixations in the forehead, eyes, nasolabial furrow, and mouth were studied. Comparisons between both groups of adults were made by an intraclass correlation coefficient, Student’s t-test, and Bland Altman graphic. Results: Health professionals (93% female; 34 ± 9 years old), compared to non-health professionals (64% female; 35 ± 11 years old), gave lower scores for images at rest (0.81 ± 0.50 vs. 1.59 ± 0.76; p = 0.010), with no difference for those obtained during the painful procedure (6.98 ± 1.08 vs. 6.73 ± 0.82). There was a strong or almost perfect correlation for the number of fixations in the mouth, eyes, forehead, and for the total fixation time in the eyes and forehead. Conclusions: Adults, irrespective of their profession, showed a homogeneous gaze pattern when evaluating pictures of neonates at rest or during a painful procedures.
id SBPE-1_e1395f1dfa80b1f28703d58a4f61d29e
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0021-75572022000400406
network_acronym_str SBPE-1
network_name_str Jornal de Pediatria (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Looking at neonatal facial features of pain: do health and non-health professionals differ?InfantnewbornPain perceptionFacial expressionEye-tracking technologyHealth personnelAbstract Objective: To analyze the regions that trigger the attention of adults’ gaze when assessing pain in newborn infants’ pictures and to verify if there are differences between health and non-health professionals. Method: Experimental study with 84 health professionals and 59 non-health professionals, who evaluated two images of 10 neonates, one at rest and the other during a painful procedure. Each image was shown for 7 seconds on a computer screen, while eye movements were tracked by the Tobii TX300 EyeTracker. After evaluating each image, participants gave a score from 0 (absent pain) to 10 (maximum pain), according to their perception of neonatal pain. For each image, the number and total time of gaze fixations in the forehead, eyes, nasolabial furrow, and mouth were studied. Comparisons between both groups of adults were made by an intraclass correlation coefficient, Student’s t-test, and Bland Altman graphic. Results: Health professionals (93% female; 34 ± 9 years old), compared to non-health professionals (64% female; 35 ± 11 years old), gave lower scores for images at rest (0.81 ± 0.50 vs. 1.59 ± 0.76; p = 0.010), with no difference for those obtained during the painful procedure (6.98 ± 1.08 vs. 6.73 ± 0.82). There was a strong or almost perfect correlation for the number of fixations in the mouth, eyes, forehead, and for the total fixation time in the eyes and forehead. Conclusions: Adults, irrespective of their profession, showed a homogeneous gaze pattern when evaluating pictures of neonates at rest or during a painful procedures.Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria2022-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0021-75572022000400406Jornal de Pediatria v.98 n.4 2022reponame:Jornal de Pediatria (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria (SBP)instacron:SBPE10.1016/j.jped.2021.10.006info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSoares,Juliana do Carmo AzevedoBarros,Marina Carvalho de MoraesSilva,Giselle Valério Teixeira daCarlini,Lucas PereiraHeiderich,Tatiany MarcondesOrsi,Rafael NobreBalda,Rita de Cássia XavierSilva,Pedro Augusto Santos OronaThomaz,Carlos EduardoGuinsburg,Rutheng2022-07-20T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0021-75572022000400406Revistahttp://www.jped.com.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||jped@jped.com.br1678-47820021-7557opendoar:2022-07-20T00:00Jornal de Pediatria (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria (SBP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Looking at neonatal facial features of pain: do health and non-health professionals differ?
title Looking at neonatal facial features of pain: do health and non-health professionals differ?
spellingShingle Looking at neonatal facial features of pain: do health and non-health professionals differ?
Soares,Juliana do Carmo Azevedo
Infant
newborn
Pain perception
Facial expression
Eye-tracking technology
Health personnel
title_short Looking at neonatal facial features of pain: do health and non-health professionals differ?
title_full Looking at neonatal facial features of pain: do health and non-health professionals differ?
title_fullStr Looking at neonatal facial features of pain: do health and non-health professionals differ?
title_full_unstemmed Looking at neonatal facial features of pain: do health and non-health professionals differ?
title_sort Looking at neonatal facial features of pain: do health and non-health professionals differ?
author Soares,Juliana do Carmo Azevedo
author_facet Soares,Juliana do Carmo Azevedo
Barros,Marina Carvalho de Moraes
Silva,Giselle Valério Teixeira da
Carlini,Lucas Pereira
Heiderich,Tatiany Marcondes
Orsi,Rafael Nobre
Balda,Rita de Cássia Xavier
Silva,Pedro Augusto Santos Orona
Thomaz,Carlos Eduardo
Guinsburg,Ruth
author_role author
author2 Barros,Marina Carvalho de Moraes
Silva,Giselle Valério Teixeira da
Carlini,Lucas Pereira
Heiderich,Tatiany Marcondes
Orsi,Rafael Nobre
Balda,Rita de Cássia Xavier
Silva,Pedro Augusto Santos Orona
Thomaz,Carlos Eduardo
Guinsburg,Ruth
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Soares,Juliana do Carmo Azevedo
Barros,Marina Carvalho de Moraes
Silva,Giselle Valério Teixeira da
Carlini,Lucas Pereira
Heiderich,Tatiany Marcondes
Orsi,Rafael Nobre
Balda,Rita de Cássia Xavier
Silva,Pedro Augusto Santos Orona
Thomaz,Carlos Eduardo
Guinsburg,Ruth
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Infant
newborn
Pain perception
Facial expression
Eye-tracking technology
Health personnel
topic Infant
newborn
Pain perception
Facial expression
Eye-tracking technology
Health personnel
description Abstract Objective: To analyze the regions that trigger the attention of adults’ gaze when assessing pain in newborn infants’ pictures and to verify if there are differences between health and non-health professionals. Method: Experimental study with 84 health professionals and 59 non-health professionals, who evaluated two images of 10 neonates, one at rest and the other during a painful procedure. Each image was shown for 7 seconds on a computer screen, while eye movements were tracked by the Tobii TX300 EyeTracker. After evaluating each image, participants gave a score from 0 (absent pain) to 10 (maximum pain), according to their perception of neonatal pain. For each image, the number and total time of gaze fixations in the forehead, eyes, nasolabial furrow, and mouth were studied. Comparisons between both groups of adults were made by an intraclass correlation coefficient, Student’s t-test, and Bland Altman graphic. Results: Health professionals (93% female; 34 ± 9 years old), compared to non-health professionals (64% female; 35 ± 11 years old), gave lower scores for images at rest (0.81 ± 0.50 vs. 1.59 ± 0.76; p = 0.010), with no difference for those obtained during the painful procedure (6.98 ± 1.08 vs. 6.73 ± 0.82). There was a strong or almost perfect correlation for the number of fixations in the mouth, eyes, forehead, and for the total fixation time in the eyes and forehead. Conclusions: Adults, irrespective of their profession, showed a homogeneous gaze pattern when evaluating pictures of neonates at rest or during a painful procedures.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-07-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0021-75572022000400406
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0021-75572022000400406
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1016/j.jped.2021.10.006
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Jornal de Pediatria v.98 n.4 2022
reponame:Jornal de Pediatria (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria (SBP)
instacron:SBPE
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria (SBP)
instacron_str SBPE
institution SBPE
reponame_str Jornal de Pediatria (Online)
collection Jornal de Pediatria (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Jornal de Pediatria (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria (SBP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||jped@jped.com.br
_version_ 1752122323324895232