High-flow nasal cannula as a post-extubation respiratory support strategy in preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis,

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Colleti Junior,José
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Azevedo,Rafael de, Araujo,Orlei, Carvalho,Werther Brunow de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Jornal de Pediatria (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0021-75572020000400422
Resumo: Abstract Objective: Perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness and complications caused by the use of the high-flow nasal cannula in relation to the post-extubation continuous positive airway pressure system in preterm newborns. Data Sources: The searches were performed from January 2013 to December 2018 in the PubMed and Embase databases, as well as a manual search on the internet. Data Synthesis: Two reviewers independently conducted the search, and a third reviewer resolved questions that arose. Ninety-eight articles from the chosen sources were evaluated, and 66 were discarded because they did not meet the inclusion criteria (inadequate topic, age range, or design, in addition to the duplicates). Fifteen articles were read in full, and five more were discarded due to inadequacy to the topic or design. There were ten articles left for systematic review and four for meta-analysis. The study showed non-inferiority in terms of therapeutic failure of the high-flow nasal cannula in relation to continuous positive airway pressure after extubation of preterm newborns. In the meta-analysis, nasal trauma was significantly lower in patients submitted to the high-flow nasal cannula compared to those using continuous positive airway pressure (p < 0.00001). Conclusion: The high-flow nasal cannula is not inferior to continuous positive airway pressure for post-extubation respiratory support in preterm newborns with a gestational age of 32 weeks or less and greater than 28 weeks, in addition to resulting in less nasal trauma.
id SBPE-1_e9b3a403a164816c84033064fee6839d
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0021-75572020000400422
network_acronym_str SBPE-1
network_name_str Jornal de Pediatria (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling High-flow nasal cannula as a post-extubation respiratory support strategy in preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis,NewbornPrematureAirway extubationRespiratory insufficiencyHigh-flow nasal cannulaAbstract Objective: Perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness and complications caused by the use of the high-flow nasal cannula in relation to the post-extubation continuous positive airway pressure system in preterm newborns. Data Sources: The searches were performed from January 2013 to December 2018 in the PubMed and Embase databases, as well as a manual search on the internet. Data Synthesis: Two reviewers independently conducted the search, and a third reviewer resolved questions that arose. Ninety-eight articles from the chosen sources were evaluated, and 66 were discarded because they did not meet the inclusion criteria (inadequate topic, age range, or design, in addition to the duplicates). Fifteen articles were read in full, and five more were discarded due to inadequacy to the topic or design. There were ten articles left for systematic review and four for meta-analysis. The study showed non-inferiority in terms of therapeutic failure of the high-flow nasal cannula in relation to continuous positive airway pressure after extubation of preterm newborns. In the meta-analysis, nasal trauma was significantly lower in patients submitted to the high-flow nasal cannula compared to those using continuous positive airway pressure (p < 0.00001). Conclusion: The high-flow nasal cannula is not inferior to continuous positive airway pressure for post-extubation respiratory support in preterm newborns with a gestational age of 32 weeks or less and greater than 28 weeks, in addition to resulting in less nasal trauma.Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria2020-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0021-75572020000400422Jornal de Pediatria v.96 n.4 2020reponame:Jornal de Pediatria (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria (SBP)instacron:SBPE10.1016/j.jped.2019.11.004info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessColleti Junior,JoséAzevedo,Rafael deAraujo,OrleiCarvalho,Werther Brunow deeng2020-08-24T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0021-75572020000400422Revistahttp://www.jped.com.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||jped@jped.com.br1678-47820021-7557opendoar:2020-08-24T00:00Jornal de Pediatria (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria (SBP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv High-flow nasal cannula as a post-extubation respiratory support strategy in preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis,
title High-flow nasal cannula as a post-extubation respiratory support strategy in preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis,
spellingShingle High-flow nasal cannula as a post-extubation respiratory support strategy in preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis,
Colleti Junior,José
Newborn
Premature
Airway extubation
Respiratory insufficiency
High-flow nasal cannula
title_short High-flow nasal cannula as a post-extubation respiratory support strategy in preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis,
title_full High-flow nasal cannula as a post-extubation respiratory support strategy in preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis,
title_fullStr High-flow nasal cannula as a post-extubation respiratory support strategy in preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis,
title_full_unstemmed High-flow nasal cannula as a post-extubation respiratory support strategy in preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis,
title_sort High-flow nasal cannula as a post-extubation respiratory support strategy in preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis,
author Colleti Junior,José
author_facet Colleti Junior,José
Azevedo,Rafael de
Araujo,Orlei
Carvalho,Werther Brunow de
author_role author
author2 Azevedo,Rafael de
Araujo,Orlei
Carvalho,Werther Brunow de
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Colleti Junior,José
Azevedo,Rafael de
Araujo,Orlei
Carvalho,Werther Brunow de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Newborn
Premature
Airway extubation
Respiratory insufficiency
High-flow nasal cannula
topic Newborn
Premature
Airway extubation
Respiratory insufficiency
High-flow nasal cannula
description Abstract Objective: Perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness and complications caused by the use of the high-flow nasal cannula in relation to the post-extubation continuous positive airway pressure system in preterm newborns. Data Sources: The searches were performed from January 2013 to December 2018 in the PubMed and Embase databases, as well as a manual search on the internet. Data Synthesis: Two reviewers independently conducted the search, and a third reviewer resolved questions that arose. Ninety-eight articles from the chosen sources were evaluated, and 66 were discarded because they did not meet the inclusion criteria (inadequate topic, age range, or design, in addition to the duplicates). Fifteen articles were read in full, and five more were discarded due to inadequacy to the topic or design. There were ten articles left for systematic review and four for meta-analysis. The study showed non-inferiority in terms of therapeutic failure of the high-flow nasal cannula in relation to continuous positive airway pressure after extubation of preterm newborns. In the meta-analysis, nasal trauma was significantly lower in patients submitted to the high-flow nasal cannula compared to those using continuous positive airway pressure (p < 0.00001). Conclusion: The high-flow nasal cannula is not inferior to continuous positive airway pressure for post-extubation respiratory support in preterm newborns with a gestational age of 32 weeks or less and greater than 28 weeks, in addition to resulting in less nasal trauma.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0021-75572020000400422
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0021-75572020000400422
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1016/j.jped.2019.11.004
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Jornal de Pediatria v.96 n.4 2020
reponame:Jornal de Pediatria (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria (SBP)
instacron:SBPE
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria (SBP)
instacron_str SBPE
institution SBPE
reponame_str Jornal de Pediatria (Online)
collection Jornal de Pediatria (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Jornal de Pediatria (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria (SBP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||jped@jped.com.br
_version_ 1752122322309873664