Evaluation of the risk of a stripping perforation with gates-glidden drills: serial versus crown-down sequences

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Coutinho-Filho,Tauby
Data de Publicação: 2008
Outros Autores: De-Deus,Gustavo, Gurgel-Filho,Eduardo Diogo, Rocha-Lima,Ana Carolina, Dias,Katia Regina Cervantes, Barbosa,Carlos Augusto
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Oral Research
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242008000100004
Resumo: The aim of this study was to evaluate the remaining dentine/cementum thickness using Gates-Glidden burs in serial and crown-down sequences and to observe which of the two sequences is the safest for preparing mesial roots of molars. Thirty-six left and right human mandibular first molars were selected. Standard access cavities were made and initially explored with Flexofiles sizes 10 and 15 until the tip was visible at the apex. The teeth were embedded in a muffle specially developed for this study using a PVC tube with two parallel metal rods in its lid. Each tooth-block was sectioned 3 mm apically to the furcation using a low-speed saw with a diamond disc. The tooth-block was examined under a microscope and an initial image was captured by a digital video system with 8 X and 12 X magnifications. Finally, the tooth-blocks were reassembled in the muffle so that the canals could be instrumented. After instrumentation the area of each mesial canal as well as the smallest distance to the root furcation were measured again. The mesio-buccal canals (crown-down order) and the mesio-lingual canals (serial sequence) presented an average area of 0.46 ± 0.16 mm² and 0.88 ± 0.27 mm² (P < 0.01), respectively. The mean values of the smallest distance to the furcation for the mesio-buccal and mesio-lingual canals were 0.66 ± 0.19 mm and 0.39 ± 0.13 mm (P < 0.01), respectively. The remaining dentine/cementum thickness using Gates-Glidden burs was greater in the crown-down sequence than in the serial sequence.
id SBPQO-1_000047125639a8aaaef238c9bc63b0b5
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1806-83242008000100004
network_acronym_str SBPQO-1
network_name_str Brazilian Oral Research
repository_id_str
spelling Evaluation of the risk of a stripping perforation with gates-glidden drills: serial versus crown-down sequencesDental instrumentsEndodonticsMolarThe aim of this study was to evaluate the remaining dentine/cementum thickness using Gates-Glidden burs in serial and crown-down sequences and to observe which of the two sequences is the safest for preparing mesial roots of molars. Thirty-six left and right human mandibular first molars were selected. Standard access cavities were made and initially explored with Flexofiles sizes 10 and 15 until the tip was visible at the apex. The teeth were embedded in a muffle specially developed for this study using a PVC tube with two parallel metal rods in its lid. Each tooth-block was sectioned 3 mm apically to the furcation using a low-speed saw with a diamond disc. The tooth-block was examined under a microscope and an initial image was captured by a digital video system with 8 X and 12 X magnifications. Finally, the tooth-blocks were reassembled in the muffle so that the canals could be instrumented. After instrumentation the area of each mesial canal as well as the smallest distance to the root furcation were measured again. The mesio-buccal canals (crown-down order) and the mesio-lingual canals (serial sequence) presented an average area of 0.46 ± 0.16 mm² and 0.88 ± 0.27 mm² (P < 0.01), respectively. The mean values of the smallest distance to the furcation for the mesio-buccal and mesio-lingual canals were 0.66 ± 0.19 mm and 0.39 ± 0.13 mm (P < 0.01), respectively. The remaining dentine/cementum thickness using Gates-Glidden burs was greater in the crown-down sequence than in the serial sequence.Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO2008-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242008000100004Brazilian Oral Research v.22 n.1 2008reponame:Brazilian Oral Researchinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)instacron:SBPQO10.1590/S1806-83242008000100004info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCoutinho-Filho,TaubyDe-Deus,GustavoGurgel-Filho,Eduardo DiogoRocha-Lima,Ana CarolinaDias,Katia Regina CervantesBarbosa,Carlos Augustoeng2008-04-10T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1806-83242008000100004Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bor/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppob@edu.usp.br||bor@sbpqo.org.br1807-31071806-8324opendoar:2008-04-10T00:00Brazilian Oral Research - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of the risk of a stripping perforation with gates-glidden drills: serial versus crown-down sequences
title Evaluation of the risk of a stripping perforation with gates-glidden drills: serial versus crown-down sequences
spellingShingle Evaluation of the risk of a stripping perforation with gates-glidden drills: serial versus crown-down sequences
Coutinho-Filho,Tauby
Dental instruments
Endodontics
Molar
title_short Evaluation of the risk of a stripping perforation with gates-glidden drills: serial versus crown-down sequences
title_full Evaluation of the risk of a stripping perforation with gates-glidden drills: serial versus crown-down sequences
title_fullStr Evaluation of the risk of a stripping perforation with gates-glidden drills: serial versus crown-down sequences
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the risk of a stripping perforation with gates-glidden drills: serial versus crown-down sequences
title_sort Evaluation of the risk of a stripping perforation with gates-glidden drills: serial versus crown-down sequences
author Coutinho-Filho,Tauby
author_facet Coutinho-Filho,Tauby
De-Deus,Gustavo
Gurgel-Filho,Eduardo Diogo
Rocha-Lima,Ana Carolina
Dias,Katia Regina Cervantes
Barbosa,Carlos Augusto
author_role author
author2 De-Deus,Gustavo
Gurgel-Filho,Eduardo Diogo
Rocha-Lima,Ana Carolina
Dias,Katia Regina Cervantes
Barbosa,Carlos Augusto
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Coutinho-Filho,Tauby
De-Deus,Gustavo
Gurgel-Filho,Eduardo Diogo
Rocha-Lima,Ana Carolina
Dias,Katia Regina Cervantes
Barbosa,Carlos Augusto
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Dental instruments
Endodontics
Molar
topic Dental instruments
Endodontics
Molar
description The aim of this study was to evaluate the remaining dentine/cementum thickness using Gates-Glidden burs in serial and crown-down sequences and to observe which of the two sequences is the safest for preparing mesial roots of molars. Thirty-six left and right human mandibular first molars were selected. Standard access cavities were made and initially explored with Flexofiles sizes 10 and 15 until the tip was visible at the apex. The teeth were embedded in a muffle specially developed for this study using a PVC tube with two parallel metal rods in its lid. Each tooth-block was sectioned 3 mm apically to the furcation using a low-speed saw with a diamond disc. The tooth-block was examined under a microscope and an initial image was captured by a digital video system with 8 X and 12 X magnifications. Finally, the tooth-blocks were reassembled in the muffle so that the canals could be instrumented. After instrumentation the area of each mesial canal as well as the smallest distance to the root furcation were measured again. The mesio-buccal canals (crown-down order) and the mesio-lingual canals (serial sequence) presented an average area of 0.46 ± 0.16 mm² and 0.88 ± 0.27 mm² (P < 0.01), respectively. The mean values of the smallest distance to the furcation for the mesio-buccal and mesio-lingual canals were 0.66 ± 0.19 mm and 0.39 ± 0.13 mm (P < 0.01), respectively. The remaining dentine/cementum thickness using Gates-Glidden burs was greater in the crown-down sequence than in the serial sequence.
publishDate 2008
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2008-03-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242008000100004
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242008000100004
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1806-83242008000100004
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Oral Research v.22 n.1 2008
reponame:Brazilian Oral Research
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
instacron:SBPQO
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
instacron_str SBPQO
institution SBPQO
reponame_str Brazilian Oral Research
collection Brazilian Oral Research
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Oral Research - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv pob@edu.usp.br||bor@sbpqo.org.br
_version_ 1750318321223335936