Assessment of enamel demineralization using conventional, digital, and digitized radiography

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ferreira,Rívea Inês
Data de Publicação: 2006
Outros Autores: Haiter-Neto,Francisco, Tabchoury,Cínthia Pereira Machado, Paiva,Guilherme Assumpção Neves de, Bóscolo,Frab Norberto
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Oral Research
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242006000200005
Resumo: This experimental research aimed at evaluating the accuracy of enamel demineralization detection using conventional, digital, and digitized radiographs, as well as to compare radiographs and logarithmically contrast-enhanced subtraction images. Enamel subsurface demineralization was induced on one of the approximal surfaces of 49 sound third molars. Standardized radiographs of the teeth were taken prior to and after the demineralization phase with three digital systems - CygnusRay MPS®, DenOptix® and DIGORA® - and InSight® film. Three radiologists interpreted the pairs of conventional, digital, and digitized radiographs in two different occasions. Logarithmically contrast-enhanced subtraction images were examined by a fourth radiologist only once. Radiographic diagnosis was validated by cross-sectional microhardness profiling in the test areas of the approximal surfaces. Accuracy was estimated by Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis. Chi-square test, at a significance level of 5%, was used to compare the areas under the ROC curves (Az) calculated for the different imaging modalities. Concerning the radiographs, the DenOptix® system (Az = 0.91) and conventional radiographs (Az = 0.90) presented the highest accuracy values compared with the other three radiographic modalities. However, logarithmically contrast-enhanced subtraction images (Az = 0.98) were significantly more accurate than conventional, digital, and digitized radiographs (p = 0.0000). It can be concluded that the DenOptix® system and conventional radiographs provide better performance for diagnosing enamel subsurface demineralization. Logarithmic subtraction significantly improves radiographic detection.
id SBPQO-1_3b754def2d20ae33fe25dbda77c87a9c
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1806-83242006000200005
network_acronym_str SBPQO-1
network_name_str Brazilian Oral Research
repository_id_str
spelling Assessment of enamel demineralization using conventional, digital, and digitized radiographyDental enamelDemineralizationRadiographyDiagnosisThis experimental research aimed at evaluating the accuracy of enamel demineralization detection using conventional, digital, and digitized radiographs, as well as to compare radiographs and logarithmically contrast-enhanced subtraction images. Enamel subsurface demineralization was induced on one of the approximal surfaces of 49 sound third molars. Standardized radiographs of the teeth were taken prior to and after the demineralization phase with three digital systems - CygnusRay MPS®, DenOptix® and DIGORA® - and InSight® film. Three radiologists interpreted the pairs of conventional, digital, and digitized radiographs in two different occasions. Logarithmically contrast-enhanced subtraction images were examined by a fourth radiologist only once. Radiographic diagnosis was validated by cross-sectional microhardness profiling in the test areas of the approximal surfaces. Accuracy was estimated by Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis. Chi-square test, at a significance level of 5%, was used to compare the areas under the ROC curves (Az) calculated for the different imaging modalities. Concerning the radiographs, the DenOptix® system (Az = 0.91) and conventional radiographs (Az = 0.90) presented the highest accuracy values compared with the other three radiographic modalities. However, logarithmically contrast-enhanced subtraction images (Az = 0.98) were significantly more accurate than conventional, digital, and digitized radiographs (p = 0.0000). It can be concluded that the DenOptix® system and conventional radiographs provide better performance for diagnosing enamel subsurface demineralization. Logarithmic subtraction significantly improves radiographic detection.Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO2006-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242006000200005Brazilian Oral Research v.20 n.2 2006reponame:Brazilian Oral Researchinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)instacron:SBPQO10.1590/S1806-83242006000200005info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFerreira,Rívea InêsHaiter-Neto,FranciscoTabchoury,Cínthia Pereira MachadoPaiva,Guilherme Assumpção Neves deBóscolo,Frab Norbertoeng2006-07-18T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1806-83242006000200005Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bor/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppob@edu.usp.br||bor@sbpqo.org.br1807-31071806-8324opendoar:2006-07-18T00:00Brazilian Oral Research - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Assessment of enamel demineralization using conventional, digital, and digitized radiography
title Assessment of enamel demineralization using conventional, digital, and digitized radiography
spellingShingle Assessment of enamel demineralization using conventional, digital, and digitized radiography
Ferreira,Rívea Inês
Dental enamel
Demineralization
Radiography
Diagnosis
title_short Assessment of enamel demineralization using conventional, digital, and digitized radiography
title_full Assessment of enamel demineralization using conventional, digital, and digitized radiography
title_fullStr Assessment of enamel demineralization using conventional, digital, and digitized radiography
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of enamel demineralization using conventional, digital, and digitized radiography
title_sort Assessment of enamel demineralization using conventional, digital, and digitized radiography
author Ferreira,Rívea Inês
author_facet Ferreira,Rívea Inês
Haiter-Neto,Francisco
Tabchoury,Cínthia Pereira Machado
Paiva,Guilherme Assumpção Neves de
Bóscolo,Frab Norberto
author_role author
author2 Haiter-Neto,Francisco
Tabchoury,Cínthia Pereira Machado
Paiva,Guilherme Assumpção Neves de
Bóscolo,Frab Norberto
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ferreira,Rívea Inês
Haiter-Neto,Francisco
Tabchoury,Cínthia Pereira Machado
Paiva,Guilherme Assumpção Neves de
Bóscolo,Frab Norberto
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Dental enamel
Demineralization
Radiography
Diagnosis
topic Dental enamel
Demineralization
Radiography
Diagnosis
description This experimental research aimed at evaluating the accuracy of enamel demineralization detection using conventional, digital, and digitized radiographs, as well as to compare radiographs and logarithmically contrast-enhanced subtraction images. Enamel subsurface demineralization was induced on one of the approximal surfaces of 49 sound third molars. Standardized radiographs of the teeth were taken prior to and after the demineralization phase with three digital systems - CygnusRay MPS®, DenOptix® and DIGORA® - and InSight® film. Three radiologists interpreted the pairs of conventional, digital, and digitized radiographs in two different occasions. Logarithmically contrast-enhanced subtraction images were examined by a fourth radiologist only once. Radiographic diagnosis was validated by cross-sectional microhardness profiling in the test areas of the approximal surfaces. Accuracy was estimated by Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis. Chi-square test, at a significance level of 5%, was used to compare the areas under the ROC curves (Az) calculated for the different imaging modalities. Concerning the radiographs, the DenOptix® system (Az = 0.91) and conventional radiographs (Az = 0.90) presented the highest accuracy values compared with the other three radiographic modalities. However, logarithmically contrast-enhanced subtraction images (Az = 0.98) were significantly more accurate than conventional, digital, and digitized radiographs (p = 0.0000). It can be concluded that the DenOptix® system and conventional radiographs provide better performance for diagnosing enamel subsurface demineralization. Logarithmic subtraction significantly improves radiographic detection.
publishDate 2006
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2006-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242006000200005
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242006000200005
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1806-83242006000200005
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Oral Research v.20 n.2 2006
reponame:Brazilian Oral Research
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
instacron:SBPQO
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
instacron_str SBPQO
institution SBPQO
reponame_str Brazilian Oral Research
collection Brazilian Oral Research
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Oral Research - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv pob@edu.usp.br||bor@sbpqo.org.br
_version_ 1750318320748331008