Complications with PMMA compared with other materials used in cranioplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Oral Research |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242018000100402 |
Resumo: | Abstract Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) has been considered a suitable material for cranioplasty. However, no consensus has been reached concerning the best material for cranioplasty with regard to minimizing complications. Thus, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the complication rates of PMMA with those of autologous bone and titanium mesh. This review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42016042725). Systematic searches were conducted on PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science. The focus question was, “Do PMMA prostheses used in cranioplasty have complications rates similar to those of autologous bone and titanium mesh?” A meta-analysis of complication rates was performed on the basis of dichotomous outcomes assessed by risk ratio (RR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). From 1014 data sources, 11 articles were selected according to eligibility criteria. These articles involved 1,256 individuals and 1,278 cranioplasties using autologous bone (n = 408), PMMA (n = 379), or titanium (n = 151). The follow-up period ranged from 63 days to 54.3 months. No difference was observed between the complication rates of PMMA and autologous bone (p = 0.94; RR, 0.98; 95%CI, 0.54–1.75) or between PMMA and titanium (p = 0.38; RR, 1.59; 95%CI, 0.57–4.48). Sub-analysis of the reasons for craniotomy (trauma/non-trauma) was conducted, which revealed no significant difference (p = 0.91; RR, 0.95; 95%CI, 0.37–2.42). The meta-analysis indicated that the use of PMMA yields complication rates that are near those of autologous bone and titanium mesh. |
id |
SBPQO-1_6720b3f07cfa1386b2a510fa21aa5a61 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1806-83242018000100402 |
network_acronym_str |
SBPQO-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Oral Research |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Complications with PMMA compared with other materials used in cranioplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysisAcrylic ResinsProsthesis ImplantationSkullAbstract Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) has been considered a suitable material for cranioplasty. However, no consensus has been reached concerning the best material for cranioplasty with regard to minimizing complications. Thus, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the complication rates of PMMA with those of autologous bone and titanium mesh. This review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42016042725). Systematic searches were conducted on PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science. The focus question was, “Do PMMA prostheses used in cranioplasty have complications rates similar to those of autologous bone and titanium mesh?” A meta-analysis of complication rates was performed on the basis of dichotomous outcomes assessed by risk ratio (RR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). From 1014 data sources, 11 articles were selected according to eligibility criteria. These articles involved 1,256 individuals and 1,278 cranioplasties using autologous bone (n = 408), PMMA (n = 379), or titanium (n = 151). The follow-up period ranged from 63 days to 54.3 months. No difference was observed between the complication rates of PMMA and autologous bone (p = 0.94; RR, 0.98; 95%CI, 0.54–1.75) or between PMMA and titanium (p = 0.38; RR, 1.59; 95%CI, 0.57–4.48). Sub-analysis of the reasons for craniotomy (trauma/non-trauma) was conducted, which revealed no significant difference (p = 0.91; RR, 0.95; 95%CI, 0.37–2.42). The meta-analysis indicated that the use of PMMA yields complication rates that are near those of autologous bone and titanium mesh.Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO2018-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242018000100402Brazilian Oral Research v.32 2018reponame:Brazilian Oral Researchinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)instacron:SBPQO10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0031info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLEÃO,Rafaella de SouzaMAIOR,Juliana Raposo SoutoLEMOS,Cleidiel Aparecido de AraújoVASCONCELOS,Belmiro Cavalcanti do EgitoMONTES,Marcos Antônio Japiassú ResendePELLIZZER,Eduardo PizaMORAES,Sandra Lúcia Dantaseng2018-07-19T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1806-83242018000100402Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bor/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppob@edu.usp.br||bor@sbpqo.org.br1807-31071806-8324opendoar:2018-07-19T00:00Brazilian Oral Research - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Complications with PMMA compared with other materials used in cranioplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title |
Complications with PMMA compared with other materials used in cranioplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
spellingShingle |
Complications with PMMA compared with other materials used in cranioplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis LEÃO,Rafaella de Souza Acrylic Resins Prosthesis Implantation Skull |
title_short |
Complications with PMMA compared with other materials used in cranioplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full |
Complications with PMMA compared with other materials used in cranioplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr |
Complications with PMMA compared with other materials used in cranioplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Complications with PMMA compared with other materials used in cranioplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort |
Complications with PMMA compared with other materials used in cranioplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
author |
LEÃO,Rafaella de Souza |
author_facet |
LEÃO,Rafaella de Souza MAIOR,Juliana Raposo Souto LEMOS,Cleidiel Aparecido de Araújo VASCONCELOS,Belmiro Cavalcanti do Egito MONTES,Marcos Antônio Japiassú Resende PELLIZZER,Eduardo Piza MORAES,Sandra Lúcia Dantas |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
MAIOR,Juliana Raposo Souto LEMOS,Cleidiel Aparecido de Araújo VASCONCELOS,Belmiro Cavalcanti do Egito MONTES,Marcos Antônio Japiassú Resende PELLIZZER,Eduardo Piza MORAES,Sandra Lúcia Dantas |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
LEÃO,Rafaella de Souza MAIOR,Juliana Raposo Souto LEMOS,Cleidiel Aparecido de Araújo VASCONCELOS,Belmiro Cavalcanti do Egito MONTES,Marcos Antônio Japiassú Resende PELLIZZER,Eduardo Piza MORAES,Sandra Lúcia Dantas |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Acrylic Resins Prosthesis Implantation Skull |
topic |
Acrylic Resins Prosthesis Implantation Skull |
description |
Abstract Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) has been considered a suitable material for cranioplasty. However, no consensus has been reached concerning the best material for cranioplasty with regard to minimizing complications. Thus, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the complication rates of PMMA with those of autologous bone and titanium mesh. This review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42016042725). Systematic searches were conducted on PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science. The focus question was, “Do PMMA prostheses used in cranioplasty have complications rates similar to those of autologous bone and titanium mesh?” A meta-analysis of complication rates was performed on the basis of dichotomous outcomes assessed by risk ratio (RR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). From 1014 data sources, 11 articles were selected according to eligibility criteria. These articles involved 1,256 individuals and 1,278 cranioplasties using autologous bone (n = 408), PMMA (n = 379), or titanium (n = 151). The follow-up period ranged from 63 days to 54.3 months. No difference was observed between the complication rates of PMMA and autologous bone (p = 0.94; RR, 0.98; 95%CI, 0.54–1.75) or between PMMA and titanium (p = 0.38; RR, 1.59; 95%CI, 0.57–4.48). Sub-analysis of the reasons for craniotomy (trauma/non-trauma) was conducted, which revealed no significant difference (p = 0.91; RR, 0.95; 95%CI, 0.37–2.42). The meta-analysis indicated that the use of PMMA yields complication rates that are near those of autologous bone and titanium mesh. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242018000100402 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242018000100402 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0031 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Oral Research v.32 2018 reponame:Brazilian Oral Research instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO) instacron:SBPQO |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO) |
instacron_str |
SBPQO |
institution |
SBPQO |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Oral Research |
collection |
Brazilian Oral Research |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Oral Research - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
pob@edu.usp.br||bor@sbpqo.org.br |
_version_ |
1750318326170517504 |