Complications with PMMA compared with other materials used in cranioplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: LEÃO,Rafaella de Souza
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: MAIOR,Juliana Raposo Souto, LEMOS,Cleidiel Aparecido de Araújo, VASCONCELOS,Belmiro Cavalcanti do Egito, MONTES,Marcos Antônio Japiassú Resende, PELLIZZER,Eduardo Piza, MORAES,Sandra Lúcia Dantas
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Oral Research
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242018000100402
Resumo: Abstract Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) has been considered a suitable material for cranioplasty. However, no consensus has been reached concerning the best material for cranioplasty with regard to minimizing complications. Thus, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the complication rates of PMMA with those of autologous bone and titanium mesh. This review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42016042725). Systematic searches were conducted on PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science. The focus question was, “Do PMMA prostheses used in cranioplasty have complications rates similar to those of autologous bone and titanium mesh?” A meta-analysis of complication rates was performed on the basis of dichotomous outcomes assessed by risk ratio (RR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). From 1014 data sources, 11 articles were selected according to eligibility criteria. These articles involved 1,256 individuals and 1,278 cranioplasties using autologous bone (n = 408), PMMA (n = 379), or titanium (n = 151). The follow-up period ranged from 63 days to 54.3 months. No difference was observed between the complication rates of PMMA and autologous bone (p = 0.94; RR, 0.98; 95%CI, 0.54–1.75) or between PMMA and titanium (p = 0.38; RR, 1.59; 95%CI, 0.57–4.48). Sub-analysis of the reasons for craniotomy (trauma/non-trauma) was conducted, which revealed no significant difference (p = 0.91; RR, 0.95; 95%CI, 0.37–2.42). The meta-analysis indicated that the use of PMMA yields complication rates that are near those of autologous bone and titanium mesh.
id SBPQO-1_6720b3f07cfa1386b2a510fa21aa5a61
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1806-83242018000100402
network_acronym_str SBPQO-1
network_name_str Brazilian Oral Research
repository_id_str
spelling Complications with PMMA compared with other materials used in cranioplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysisAcrylic ResinsProsthesis ImplantationSkullAbstract Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) has been considered a suitable material for cranioplasty. However, no consensus has been reached concerning the best material for cranioplasty with regard to minimizing complications. Thus, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the complication rates of PMMA with those of autologous bone and titanium mesh. This review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42016042725). Systematic searches were conducted on PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science. The focus question was, “Do PMMA prostheses used in cranioplasty have complications rates similar to those of autologous bone and titanium mesh?” A meta-analysis of complication rates was performed on the basis of dichotomous outcomes assessed by risk ratio (RR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). From 1014 data sources, 11 articles were selected according to eligibility criteria. These articles involved 1,256 individuals and 1,278 cranioplasties using autologous bone (n = 408), PMMA (n = 379), or titanium (n = 151). The follow-up period ranged from 63 days to 54.3 months. No difference was observed between the complication rates of PMMA and autologous bone (p = 0.94; RR, 0.98; 95%CI, 0.54–1.75) or between PMMA and titanium (p = 0.38; RR, 1.59; 95%CI, 0.57–4.48). Sub-analysis of the reasons for craniotomy (trauma/non-trauma) was conducted, which revealed no significant difference (p = 0.91; RR, 0.95; 95%CI, 0.37–2.42). The meta-analysis indicated that the use of PMMA yields complication rates that are near those of autologous bone and titanium mesh.Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO2018-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242018000100402Brazilian Oral Research v.32 2018reponame:Brazilian Oral Researchinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)instacron:SBPQO10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0031info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLEÃO,Rafaella de SouzaMAIOR,Juliana Raposo SoutoLEMOS,Cleidiel Aparecido de AraújoVASCONCELOS,Belmiro Cavalcanti do EgitoMONTES,Marcos Antônio Japiassú ResendePELLIZZER,Eduardo PizaMORAES,Sandra Lúcia Dantaseng2018-07-19T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1806-83242018000100402Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bor/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppob@edu.usp.br||bor@sbpqo.org.br1807-31071806-8324opendoar:2018-07-19T00:00Brazilian Oral Research - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Complications with PMMA compared with other materials used in cranioplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Complications with PMMA compared with other materials used in cranioplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis
spellingShingle Complications with PMMA compared with other materials used in cranioplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis
LEÃO,Rafaella de Souza
Acrylic Resins
Prosthesis Implantation
Skull
title_short Complications with PMMA compared with other materials used in cranioplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Complications with PMMA compared with other materials used in cranioplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Complications with PMMA compared with other materials used in cranioplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Complications with PMMA compared with other materials used in cranioplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort Complications with PMMA compared with other materials used in cranioplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis
author LEÃO,Rafaella de Souza
author_facet LEÃO,Rafaella de Souza
MAIOR,Juliana Raposo Souto
LEMOS,Cleidiel Aparecido de Araújo
VASCONCELOS,Belmiro Cavalcanti do Egito
MONTES,Marcos Antônio Japiassú Resende
PELLIZZER,Eduardo Piza
MORAES,Sandra Lúcia Dantas
author_role author
author2 MAIOR,Juliana Raposo Souto
LEMOS,Cleidiel Aparecido de Araújo
VASCONCELOS,Belmiro Cavalcanti do Egito
MONTES,Marcos Antônio Japiassú Resende
PELLIZZER,Eduardo Piza
MORAES,Sandra Lúcia Dantas
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv LEÃO,Rafaella de Souza
MAIOR,Juliana Raposo Souto
LEMOS,Cleidiel Aparecido de Araújo
VASCONCELOS,Belmiro Cavalcanti do Egito
MONTES,Marcos Antônio Japiassú Resende
PELLIZZER,Eduardo Piza
MORAES,Sandra Lúcia Dantas
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Acrylic Resins
Prosthesis Implantation
Skull
topic Acrylic Resins
Prosthesis Implantation
Skull
description Abstract Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) has been considered a suitable material for cranioplasty. However, no consensus has been reached concerning the best material for cranioplasty with regard to minimizing complications. Thus, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the complication rates of PMMA with those of autologous bone and titanium mesh. This review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42016042725). Systematic searches were conducted on PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science. The focus question was, “Do PMMA prostheses used in cranioplasty have complications rates similar to those of autologous bone and titanium mesh?” A meta-analysis of complication rates was performed on the basis of dichotomous outcomes assessed by risk ratio (RR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). From 1014 data sources, 11 articles were selected according to eligibility criteria. These articles involved 1,256 individuals and 1,278 cranioplasties using autologous bone (n = 408), PMMA (n = 379), or titanium (n = 151). The follow-up period ranged from 63 days to 54.3 months. No difference was observed between the complication rates of PMMA and autologous bone (p = 0.94; RR, 0.98; 95%CI, 0.54–1.75) or between PMMA and titanium (p = 0.38; RR, 1.59; 95%CI, 0.57–4.48). Sub-analysis of the reasons for craniotomy (trauma/non-trauma) was conducted, which revealed no significant difference (p = 0.91; RR, 0.95; 95%CI, 0.37–2.42). The meta-analysis indicated that the use of PMMA yields complication rates that are near those of autologous bone and titanium mesh.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242018000100402
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242018000100402
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0031
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Oral Research v.32 2018
reponame:Brazilian Oral Research
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
instacron:SBPQO
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
instacron_str SBPQO
institution SBPQO
reponame_str Brazilian Oral Research
collection Brazilian Oral Research
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Oral Research - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv pob@edu.usp.br||bor@sbpqo.org.br
_version_ 1750318326170517504