Shaping ability of rotatory or reciprocating instruments in curved canals: a micro-computed tomographic study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: JARDINE,Alexander Pompermayer
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: ROSA,Ricardo Abreu da, SANTINI,Manuela Favarin, ZACCARA,Ivana Maria, SÓ,Marcus Vinicius Reis, KOPPER,Patrícia Maria Poli
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Oral Research
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242016000100271
Resumo: Abstract This study aimed to compare apical transportation, centering ratio, and working time during root canal preparation with Wizard Navigator (WN), WaveOne (WO), or ProTaper Universal (PT) and to describe deformation and fracture of these instruments. Thirty-six mesiobuccal roots from maxillary molars were micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) scanned and then sorted into three groups (n = 12): Wizard Navigator (WN), WaveOne (WO), and ProTaper Universal (PT). The root canals were prepared using WN, WO, or PT; the time of each canal preparation was timed; and the specimens were micro-CT re-scanned. The instruments were submitted to scanning electron microscopy (SEM) before and after their use. The data on canal transportation at 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 mm and preparation time were analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by the Mann-Whitney U test. The centering ratio was analyzed by ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s test. Both instrument deformation and fracture were described. Apical transportation was similar among groups at 1, 2, 3 and 4 mm. The WO group showed higher canal transportation at 5mm than the other groups (p = 0.03). There was no significant difference in centering ratio among the groups. Preparation time in the WO group was significantly lower than in the other groups (p = 0.004). Small differences were observed in the surface area of all instruments. The WN, WO, and PT groups had a similar centering ratio without procedural errors or significant structural changes. At 5 mm from the apex, the WO group showed the largest canal transportation toward the furcation and root canal preparation was faster than in the WN and PT groups.
id SBPQO-1_76543f8cc0e22937e65233eb27aeb4e0
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1806-83242016000100271
network_acronym_str SBPQO-1
network_name_str Brazilian Oral Research
repository_id_str
spelling Shaping ability of rotatory or reciprocating instruments in curved canals: a micro-computed tomographic studyReciprocating InstrumentRotatory InstrumentMicro-CTRoot Canal PreparationAbstract This study aimed to compare apical transportation, centering ratio, and working time during root canal preparation with Wizard Navigator (WN), WaveOne (WO), or ProTaper Universal (PT) and to describe deformation and fracture of these instruments. Thirty-six mesiobuccal roots from maxillary molars were micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) scanned and then sorted into three groups (n = 12): Wizard Navigator (WN), WaveOne (WO), and ProTaper Universal (PT). The root canals were prepared using WN, WO, or PT; the time of each canal preparation was timed; and the specimens were micro-CT re-scanned. The instruments were submitted to scanning electron microscopy (SEM) before and after their use. The data on canal transportation at 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 mm and preparation time were analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by the Mann-Whitney U test. The centering ratio was analyzed by ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s test. Both instrument deformation and fracture were described. Apical transportation was similar among groups at 1, 2, 3 and 4 mm. The WO group showed higher canal transportation at 5mm than the other groups (p = 0.03). There was no significant difference in centering ratio among the groups. Preparation time in the WO group was significantly lower than in the other groups (p = 0.004). Small differences were observed in the surface area of all instruments. The WN, WO, and PT groups had a similar centering ratio without procedural errors or significant structural changes. At 5 mm from the apex, the WO group showed the largest canal transportation toward the furcation and root canal preparation was faster than in the WN and PT groups.Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO2016-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242016000100271Brazilian Oral Research v.30 n.1 2016reponame:Brazilian Oral Researchinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)instacron:SBPQO10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2016.vol30.0086info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessJARDINE,Alexander PompermayerROSA,Ricardo Abreu daSANTINI,Manuela FavarinZACCARA,Ivana MariaSÓ,Marcus Vinicius ReisKOPPER,Patrícia Maria Polieng2016-06-08T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1806-83242016000100271Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bor/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppob@edu.usp.br||bor@sbpqo.org.br1807-31071806-8324opendoar:2016-06-08T00:00Brazilian Oral Research - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Shaping ability of rotatory or reciprocating instruments in curved canals: a micro-computed tomographic study
title Shaping ability of rotatory or reciprocating instruments in curved canals: a micro-computed tomographic study
spellingShingle Shaping ability of rotatory or reciprocating instruments in curved canals: a micro-computed tomographic study
JARDINE,Alexander Pompermayer
Reciprocating Instrument
Rotatory Instrument
Micro-CT
Root Canal Preparation
title_short Shaping ability of rotatory or reciprocating instruments in curved canals: a micro-computed tomographic study
title_full Shaping ability of rotatory or reciprocating instruments in curved canals: a micro-computed tomographic study
title_fullStr Shaping ability of rotatory or reciprocating instruments in curved canals: a micro-computed tomographic study
title_full_unstemmed Shaping ability of rotatory or reciprocating instruments in curved canals: a micro-computed tomographic study
title_sort Shaping ability of rotatory or reciprocating instruments in curved canals: a micro-computed tomographic study
author JARDINE,Alexander Pompermayer
author_facet JARDINE,Alexander Pompermayer
ROSA,Ricardo Abreu da
SANTINI,Manuela Favarin
ZACCARA,Ivana Maria
SÓ,Marcus Vinicius Reis
KOPPER,Patrícia Maria Poli
author_role author
author2 ROSA,Ricardo Abreu da
SANTINI,Manuela Favarin
ZACCARA,Ivana Maria
SÓ,Marcus Vinicius Reis
KOPPER,Patrícia Maria Poli
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv JARDINE,Alexander Pompermayer
ROSA,Ricardo Abreu da
SANTINI,Manuela Favarin
ZACCARA,Ivana Maria
SÓ,Marcus Vinicius Reis
KOPPER,Patrícia Maria Poli
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Reciprocating Instrument
Rotatory Instrument
Micro-CT
Root Canal Preparation
topic Reciprocating Instrument
Rotatory Instrument
Micro-CT
Root Canal Preparation
description Abstract This study aimed to compare apical transportation, centering ratio, and working time during root canal preparation with Wizard Navigator (WN), WaveOne (WO), or ProTaper Universal (PT) and to describe deformation and fracture of these instruments. Thirty-six mesiobuccal roots from maxillary molars were micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) scanned and then sorted into three groups (n = 12): Wizard Navigator (WN), WaveOne (WO), and ProTaper Universal (PT). The root canals were prepared using WN, WO, or PT; the time of each canal preparation was timed; and the specimens were micro-CT re-scanned. The instruments were submitted to scanning electron microscopy (SEM) before and after their use. The data on canal transportation at 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 mm and preparation time were analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by the Mann-Whitney U test. The centering ratio was analyzed by ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s test. Both instrument deformation and fracture were described. Apical transportation was similar among groups at 1, 2, 3 and 4 mm. The WO group showed higher canal transportation at 5mm than the other groups (p = 0.03). There was no significant difference in centering ratio among the groups. Preparation time in the WO group was significantly lower than in the other groups (p = 0.004). Small differences were observed in the surface area of all instruments. The WN, WO, and PT groups had a similar centering ratio without procedural errors or significant structural changes. At 5 mm from the apex, the WO group showed the largest canal transportation toward the furcation and root canal preparation was faster than in the WN and PT groups.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242016000100271
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242016000100271
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2016.vol30.0086
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Oral Research v.30 n.1 2016
reponame:Brazilian Oral Research
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
instacron:SBPQO
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
instacron_str SBPQO
institution SBPQO
reponame_str Brazilian Oral Research
collection Brazilian Oral Research
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Oral Research - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv pob@edu.usp.br||bor@sbpqo.org.br
_version_ 1750318324781154304