Esthetic perception of facial profile changes after extraction and nonextraction Class II treatment

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: ROCHA,Andréa Damasceno
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: CASTELUCI,Cleomária Evelyn Vieira Freire, FERREIRA,Fernando Pedrin Carvalho, CONTI,Ana Claudia, ALMEIDA,Marcio Rodrigues, ALMEIDA-PEDRIN,Renata Rodrigues
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Oral Research
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242020000100201
Resumo: Abstract This retrospective study evaluated facial profile pleasantness determined by two protocols of Class II treatment. The sample comprised facial profile silhouettes obtained retrospectively from the pretreatment (T1) and posttreatment (T2) cephalograms of 60 patients (42 males and 18 females) divided into two groups. One group of 30 patients (mean age of 12.84 years) was treated with the extraction of maxillary first premolars (mean treatment time of 2.7 years), and the other group of 30 patients (mean age of 12.81 years) was treated with a mandibular advancement appliance (Forsus) (mean treatment time of 2.49 years). The facial profile silhouettes (T1 and T2) were randomly distributed in an album containing one patient per sheet. The examiners consisted of 60 orthodontists and 60 lay individuals, who analyzed the profiles in regard to facial pleasantness, using the Likert scale. A comparison between stages T1 and T2 of the two treatment protocols and between the examiners was performed by mixed-design analysis of variance at a significance level of 5%. The results demonstrated a significant difference between T1 and T2 (greater scores for T2 compared to T1), and between lay individuals and orthodontists (orthodontists assigned higher scores), but with no significant difference between the treatment protocols. Both protocols produced positive effects on the facial profile esthetics, from the standpoint of lay individuals and orthodontists.
id SBPQO-1_8bf06b3e5130ca7870e6599f5e355112
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1806-83242020000100201
network_acronym_str SBPQO-1
network_name_str Brazilian Oral Research
repository_id_str
spelling Esthetic perception of facial profile changes after extraction and nonextraction Class II treatmentMalocclusionAngle Class IIOrthodontics, CorrectiveOrthodontic Appliances, FunctionalTooth ExtractionAbstract This retrospective study evaluated facial profile pleasantness determined by two protocols of Class II treatment. The sample comprised facial profile silhouettes obtained retrospectively from the pretreatment (T1) and posttreatment (T2) cephalograms of 60 patients (42 males and 18 females) divided into two groups. One group of 30 patients (mean age of 12.84 years) was treated with the extraction of maxillary first premolars (mean treatment time of 2.7 years), and the other group of 30 patients (mean age of 12.81 years) was treated with a mandibular advancement appliance (Forsus) (mean treatment time of 2.49 years). The facial profile silhouettes (T1 and T2) were randomly distributed in an album containing one patient per sheet. The examiners consisted of 60 orthodontists and 60 lay individuals, who analyzed the profiles in regard to facial pleasantness, using the Likert scale. A comparison between stages T1 and T2 of the two treatment protocols and between the examiners was performed by mixed-design analysis of variance at a significance level of 5%. The results demonstrated a significant difference between T1 and T2 (greater scores for T2 compared to T1), and between lay individuals and orthodontists (orthodontists assigned higher scores), but with no significant difference between the treatment protocols. Both protocols produced positive effects on the facial profile esthetics, from the standpoint of lay individuals and orthodontists.Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242020000100201Brazilian Oral Research v.34 2020reponame:Brazilian Oral Researchinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)instacron:SBPQO10.1590/1807-3107bor-2020.vol34.0003info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessROCHA,Andréa DamascenoCASTELUCI,Cleomária Evelyn Vieira FreireFERREIRA,Fernando Pedrin CarvalhoCONTI,Ana ClaudiaALMEIDA,Marcio RodriguesALMEIDA-PEDRIN,Renata Rodrigueseng2020-01-28T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1806-83242020000100201Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bor/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppob@edu.usp.br||bor@sbpqo.org.br1807-31071806-8324opendoar:2020-01-28T00:00Brazilian Oral Research - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Esthetic perception of facial profile changes after extraction and nonextraction Class II treatment
title Esthetic perception of facial profile changes after extraction and nonextraction Class II treatment
spellingShingle Esthetic perception of facial profile changes after extraction and nonextraction Class II treatment
ROCHA,Andréa Damasceno
Malocclusion
Angle Class II
Orthodontics, Corrective
Orthodontic Appliances, Functional
Tooth Extraction
title_short Esthetic perception of facial profile changes after extraction and nonextraction Class II treatment
title_full Esthetic perception of facial profile changes after extraction and nonextraction Class II treatment
title_fullStr Esthetic perception of facial profile changes after extraction and nonextraction Class II treatment
title_full_unstemmed Esthetic perception of facial profile changes after extraction and nonextraction Class II treatment
title_sort Esthetic perception of facial profile changes after extraction and nonextraction Class II treatment
author ROCHA,Andréa Damasceno
author_facet ROCHA,Andréa Damasceno
CASTELUCI,Cleomária Evelyn Vieira Freire
FERREIRA,Fernando Pedrin Carvalho
CONTI,Ana Claudia
ALMEIDA,Marcio Rodrigues
ALMEIDA-PEDRIN,Renata Rodrigues
author_role author
author2 CASTELUCI,Cleomária Evelyn Vieira Freire
FERREIRA,Fernando Pedrin Carvalho
CONTI,Ana Claudia
ALMEIDA,Marcio Rodrigues
ALMEIDA-PEDRIN,Renata Rodrigues
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv ROCHA,Andréa Damasceno
CASTELUCI,Cleomária Evelyn Vieira Freire
FERREIRA,Fernando Pedrin Carvalho
CONTI,Ana Claudia
ALMEIDA,Marcio Rodrigues
ALMEIDA-PEDRIN,Renata Rodrigues
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Malocclusion
Angle Class II
Orthodontics, Corrective
Orthodontic Appliances, Functional
Tooth Extraction
topic Malocclusion
Angle Class II
Orthodontics, Corrective
Orthodontic Appliances, Functional
Tooth Extraction
description Abstract This retrospective study evaluated facial profile pleasantness determined by two protocols of Class II treatment. The sample comprised facial profile silhouettes obtained retrospectively from the pretreatment (T1) and posttreatment (T2) cephalograms of 60 patients (42 males and 18 females) divided into two groups. One group of 30 patients (mean age of 12.84 years) was treated with the extraction of maxillary first premolars (mean treatment time of 2.7 years), and the other group of 30 patients (mean age of 12.81 years) was treated with a mandibular advancement appliance (Forsus) (mean treatment time of 2.49 years). The facial profile silhouettes (T1 and T2) were randomly distributed in an album containing one patient per sheet. The examiners consisted of 60 orthodontists and 60 lay individuals, who analyzed the profiles in regard to facial pleasantness, using the Likert scale. A comparison between stages T1 and T2 of the two treatment protocols and between the examiners was performed by mixed-design analysis of variance at a significance level of 5%. The results demonstrated a significant difference between T1 and T2 (greater scores for T2 compared to T1), and between lay individuals and orthodontists (orthodontists assigned higher scores), but with no significant difference between the treatment protocols. Both protocols produced positive effects on the facial profile esthetics, from the standpoint of lay individuals and orthodontists.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242020000100201
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242020000100201
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2020.vol34.0003
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Oral Research v.34 2020
reponame:Brazilian Oral Research
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
instacron:SBPQO
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
instacron_str SBPQO
institution SBPQO
reponame_str Brazilian Oral Research
collection Brazilian Oral Research
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Oral Research - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv pob@edu.usp.br||bor@sbpqo.org.br
_version_ 1750318326716825600