Do new matrix formulations improve resin composite resistance to degradation processes?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fonseca,Andrea Soares Quirino da Silva
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Gerhardt,Katia Maria da Fonseca, Pereira,Gisele Damiana da Silveira, Sinhoreti,Mario Alexandre Coelho, Schneider,Luis Felipe Jochims
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Oral Research
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242013000500410
Resumo: The aim of this study was to determine the degradation resistance of three new formulations-silorane-, Ormocer- and dimer-acid-based materials-and compare them to the traditional dimethacrylate-based materials. One silorane- (Filtek P90, P90), one Ormocer- (Ceram-X, CX), one dimer-acid- (N'Durance, ND) and two dimethacrylate-based (Filtek P60, P60; Tetric Ceram, TC) materials were investigated. Water sorption (Wsp) and solubility (Wsl) were determined after the materials were immersed in water for 28 days. Knoop hardness (KH) was determined before and after 24 h immersion in pure ethanol. The flexural-strength (FS) was determined by the bending test after one-week storage in a dry environment or after one-week immersion in pure ethanol. Data were submitted to analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's test (95%). The three new formulations showed lower Wsp than the dimethacrylate-based formulation. CX (0.50 ± 0.17%) and ND (0.72 ± 0.19%) exhibited the lowest Wsp, whereas P90 (0.02 ± 0.03%) and P60 (0.04 ± 0.03%) showed the lowest Wsl. All resins showed reduced Knoop hardness number (KHN) after ethanol immersion. P60 presented the lowest decrease in KH value (19 ± 5%). TC (48 ± 3%) and P90 (39 ± 9%) showed the highest KHN decrease after ethanol storage. The FS of CX, ND and TC were affected by ethanol storage. The new formulations did not improve the degradation resistance, as compared with the traditional methacrylate-based materials.
id SBPQO-1_980e4a9a5afbc88dd9018cff6fe09a53
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1806-83242013000500410
network_acronym_str SBPQO-1
network_name_str Brazilian Oral Research
repository_id_str
spelling Do new matrix formulations improve resin composite resistance to degradation processes?SolubilityComposite ResinsWaterThe aim of this study was to determine the degradation resistance of three new formulations-silorane-, Ormocer- and dimer-acid-based materials-and compare them to the traditional dimethacrylate-based materials. One silorane- (Filtek P90, P90), one Ormocer- (Ceram-X, CX), one dimer-acid- (N'Durance, ND) and two dimethacrylate-based (Filtek P60, P60; Tetric Ceram, TC) materials were investigated. Water sorption (Wsp) and solubility (Wsl) were determined after the materials were immersed in water for 28 days. Knoop hardness (KH) was determined before and after 24 h immersion in pure ethanol. The flexural-strength (FS) was determined by the bending test after one-week storage in a dry environment or after one-week immersion in pure ethanol. Data were submitted to analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's test (95%). The three new formulations showed lower Wsp than the dimethacrylate-based formulation. CX (0.50 ± 0.17%) and ND (0.72 ± 0.19%) exhibited the lowest Wsp, whereas P90 (0.02 ± 0.03%) and P60 (0.04 ± 0.03%) showed the lowest Wsl. All resins showed reduced Knoop hardness number (KHN) after ethanol immersion. P60 presented the lowest decrease in KH value (19 ± 5%). TC (48 ± 3%) and P90 (39 ± 9%) showed the highest KHN decrease after ethanol storage. The FS of CX, ND and TC were affected by ethanol storage. The new formulations did not improve the degradation resistance, as compared with the traditional methacrylate-based materials.Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO2013-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242013000500410Brazilian Oral Research v.27 n.5 2013reponame:Brazilian Oral Researchinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)instacron:SBPQO10.1590/S1806-83242013000500005info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFonseca,Andrea Soares Quirino da SilvaGerhardt,Katia Maria da FonsecaPereira,Gisele Damiana da SilveiraSinhoreti,Mario Alexandre CoelhoSchneider,Luis Felipe Jochimseng2013-10-08T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1806-83242013000500410Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bor/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppob@edu.usp.br||bor@sbpqo.org.br1807-31071806-8324opendoar:2013-10-08T00:00Brazilian Oral Research - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Do new matrix formulations improve resin composite resistance to degradation processes?
title Do new matrix formulations improve resin composite resistance to degradation processes?
spellingShingle Do new matrix formulations improve resin composite resistance to degradation processes?
Fonseca,Andrea Soares Quirino da Silva
Solubility
Composite Resins
Water
title_short Do new matrix formulations improve resin composite resistance to degradation processes?
title_full Do new matrix formulations improve resin composite resistance to degradation processes?
title_fullStr Do new matrix formulations improve resin composite resistance to degradation processes?
title_full_unstemmed Do new matrix formulations improve resin composite resistance to degradation processes?
title_sort Do new matrix formulations improve resin composite resistance to degradation processes?
author Fonseca,Andrea Soares Quirino da Silva
author_facet Fonseca,Andrea Soares Quirino da Silva
Gerhardt,Katia Maria da Fonseca
Pereira,Gisele Damiana da Silveira
Sinhoreti,Mario Alexandre Coelho
Schneider,Luis Felipe Jochims
author_role author
author2 Gerhardt,Katia Maria da Fonseca
Pereira,Gisele Damiana da Silveira
Sinhoreti,Mario Alexandre Coelho
Schneider,Luis Felipe Jochims
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fonseca,Andrea Soares Quirino da Silva
Gerhardt,Katia Maria da Fonseca
Pereira,Gisele Damiana da Silveira
Sinhoreti,Mario Alexandre Coelho
Schneider,Luis Felipe Jochims
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Solubility
Composite Resins
Water
topic Solubility
Composite Resins
Water
description The aim of this study was to determine the degradation resistance of three new formulations-silorane-, Ormocer- and dimer-acid-based materials-and compare them to the traditional dimethacrylate-based materials. One silorane- (Filtek P90, P90), one Ormocer- (Ceram-X, CX), one dimer-acid- (N'Durance, ND) and two dimethacrylate-based (Filtek P60, P60; Tetric Ceram, TC) materials were investigated. Water sorption (Wsp) and solubility (Wsl) were determined after the materials were immersed in water for 28 days. Knoop hardness (KH) was determined before and after 24 h immersion in pure ethanol. The flexural-strength (FS) was determined by the bending test after one-week storage in a dry environment or after one-week immersion in pure ethanol. Data were submitted to analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's test (95%). The three new formulations showed lower Wsp than the dimethacrylate-based formulation. CX (0.50 ± 0.17%) and ND (0.72 ± 0.19%) exhibited the lowest Wsp, whereas P90 (0.02 ± 0.03%) and P60 (0.04 ± 0.03%) showed the lowest Wsl. All resins showed reduced Knoop hardness number (KHN) after ethanol immersion. P60 presented the lowest decrease in KH value (19 ± 5%). TC (48 ± 3%) and P90 (39 ± 9%) showed the highest KHN decrease after ethanol storage. The FS of CX, ND and TC were affected by ethanol storage. The new formulations did not improve the degradation resistance, as compared with the traditional methacrylate-based materials.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-10-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242013000500410
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242013000500410
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1806-83242013000500005
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Oral Research v.27 n.5 2013
reponame:Brazilian Oral Research
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
instacron:SBPQO
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
instacron_str SBPQO
institution SBPQO
reponame_str Brazilian Oral Research
collection Brazilian Oral Research
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Oral Research - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv pob@edu.usp.br||bor@sbpqo.org.br
_version_ 1750318323416956928