Comparative study of flexural strength and elasticity modulus in two types of direct fiber-reinforced systems
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2009 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Oral Research |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242009000300003 |
Resumo: | The objective of this study was to compare the flexural strength and elasticity modulus of two types of staple reinforcement fibers, Interlig - Ângelus®/glass (Londrina, PR, Brazil) and Connect - KerrLab®/polyethylene (MFG Co., West Collins Orange, CA, USA), which are widely used in Dentistry for chairside use, after varying the number of layers employed and submitting or not to thermocycling. This study was performed on 72 specimens, divided into 8 groups: G1 - single layer of Interlig fibers without thermocycling; G2 - double layer of Interlig fibers without thermocycling; G3 - single layer of Interlig fibers with thermocycling; and G4 - double layer of Interlig fibers with thermocycling; G5 - single layer of Connect fibers without termocycling; G6 - double layer of Connect fibers without termocycling; G7 - single layer of Connect fibers with termocycling; G8 - double layer of Connect fibers with termocycling. For each group, values for flexural strength and elasticity modulus were obtained. The polyethylene fiber employed in a double layer presented the highest flexural strength (p < 0.05), independently of thermocycling (p < 0.001), when compared to the other evaluated combinations. The polyethylene fiber, used in a single layer without thermocycling, demonstrated a significantly higher elasticity modulus, when compared to the other groups (p < 0.05). Within the limits of this study, it was concluded that the polyethylene fiber in a double layer appears to be more resistant, regardless of whether it was submitted to thermocycling or not. |
id |
SBPQO-1_afb2c51f892b54dc8ce7c9ab50a7911c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1806-83242009000300003 |
network_acronym_str |
SBPQO-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Oral Research |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparative study of flexural strength and elasticity modulus in two types of direct fiber-reinforced systemsDentistryComposite resinsDental materialsThe objective of this study was to compare the flexural strength and elasticity modulus of two types of staple reinforcement fibers, Interlig - Ângelus®/glass (Londrina, PR, Brazil) and Connect - KerrLab®/polyethylene (MFG Co., West Collins Orange, CA, USA), which are widely used in Dentistry for chairside use, after varying the number of layers employed and submitting or not to thermocycling. This study was performed on 72 specimens, divided into 8 groups: G1 - single layer of Interlig fibers without thermocycling; G2 - double layer of Interlig fibers without thermocycling; G3 - single layer of Interlig fibers with thermocycling; and G4 - double layer of Interlig fibers with thermocycling; G5 - single layer of Connect fibers without termocycling; G6 - double layer of Connect fibers without termocycling; G7 - single layer of Connect fibers with termocycling; G8 - double layer of Connect fibers with termocycling. For each group, values for flexural strength and elasticity modulus were obtained. The polyethylene fiber employed in a double layer presented the highest flexural strength (p < 0.05), independently of thermocycling (p < 0.001), when compared to the other evaluated combinations. The polyethylene fiber, used in a single layer without thermocycling, demonstrated a significantly higher elasticity modulus, when compared to the other groups (p < 0.05). Within the limits of this study, it was concluded that the polyethylene fiber in a double layer appears to be more resistant, regardless of whether it was submitted to thermocycling or not.Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO2009-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242009000300003Brazilian Oral Research v.23 n.3 2009reponame:Brazilian Oral Researchinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)instacron:SBPQO10.1590/S1806-83242009000300003info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGaspar Junior,Alfredo de AquinoLopes,Manuela Wanderley FerreiraGaspar,Gabriela da SilveiraBraz,Rodivaneng2009-11-04T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1806-83242009000300003Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bor/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppob@edu.usp.br||bor@sbpqo.org.br1807-31071806-8324opendoar:2009-11-04T00:00Brazilian Oral Research - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparative study of flexural strength and elasticity modulus in two types of direct fiber-reinforced systems |
title |
Comparative study of flexural strength and elasticity modulus in two types of direct fiber-reinforced systems |
spellingShingle |
Comparative study of flexural strength and elasticity modulus in two types of direct fiber-reinforced systems Gaspar Junior,Alfredo de Aquino Dentistry Composite resins Dental materials |
title_short |
Comparative study of flexural strength and elasticity modulus in two types of direct fiber-reinforced systems |
title_full |
Comparative study of flexural strength and elasticity modulus in two types of direct fiber-reinforced systems |
title_fullStr |
Comparative study of flexural strength and elasticity modulus in two types of direct fiber-reinforced systems |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparative study of flexural strength and elasticity modulus in two types of direct fiber-reinforced systems |
title_sort |
Comparative study of flexural strength and elasticity modulus in two types of direct fiber-reinforced systems |
author |
Gaspar Junior,Alfredo de Aquino |
author_facet |
Gaspar Junior,Alfredo de Aquino Lopes,Manuela Wanderley Ferreira Gaspar,Gabriela da Silveira Braz,Rodivan |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lopes,Manuela Wanderley Ferreira Gaspar,Gabriela da Silveira Braz,Rodivan |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Gaspar Junior,Alfredo de Aquino Lopes,Manuela Wanderley Ferreira Gaspar,Gabriela da Silveira Braz,Rodivan |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Dentistry Composite resins Dental materials |
topic |
Dentistry Composite resins Dental materials |
description |
The objective of this study was to compare the flexural strength and elasticity modulus of two types of staple reinforcement fibers, Interlig - Ângelus®/glass (Londrina, PR, Brazil) and Connect - KerrLab®/polyethylene (MFG Co., West Collins Orange, CA, USA), which are widely used in Dentistry for chairside use, after varying the number of layers employed and submitting or not to thermocycling. This study was performed on 72 specimens, divided into 8 groups: G1 - single layer of Interlig fibers without thermocycling; G2 - double layer of Interlig fibers without thermocycling; G3 - single layer of Interlig fibers with thermocycling; and G4 - double layer of Interlig fibers with thermocycling; G5 - single layer of Connect fibers without termocycling; G6 - double layer of Connect fibers without termocycling; G7 - single layer of Connect fibers with termocycling; G8 - double layer of Connect fibers with termocycling. For each group, values for flexural strength and elasticity modulus were obtained. The polyethylene fiber employed in a double layer presented the highest flexural strength (p < 0.05), independently of thermocycling (p < 0.001), when compared to the other evaluated combinations. The polyethylene fiber, used in a single layer without thermocycling, demonstrated a significantly higher elasticity modulus, when compared to the other groups (p < 0.05). Within the limits of this study, it was concluded that the polyethylene fiber in a double layer appears to be more resistant, regardless of whether it was submitted to thermocycling or not. |
publishDate |
2009 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2009-09-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242009000300003 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242009000300003 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S1806-83242009000300003 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Oral Research v.23 n.3 2009 reponame:Brazilian Oral Research instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO) instacron:SBPQO |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO) |
instacron_str |
SBPQO |
institution |
SBPQO |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Oral Research |
collection |
Brazilian Oral Research |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Oral Research - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
pob@edu.usp.br||bor@sbpqo.org.br |
_version_ |
1750318321645912064 |