Parental acceptance toward behavior guidance techniques for pediatric dental visits: a meta-analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: MASSIGNAN,Carla
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: SOARES,Josiane Pezzini, PIRES,Maria Marlene de Souza, DICK,Bruce, PORPORATTI,André Luís, CANTO,Graziela De Luca, BOLAN,Michele
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Oral Research
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242022000100953
Resumo: Abstract This study aimed to answer the following question: What is the proportion of acceptance reported by parents toward pediatric behavior guidance techniques (BGTs)? Observational studies that evaluated parental acceptance of BGTs during pediatric dental visits among parents of non-special health care need (non-SHCN) and SHCN children were included. A search of the Cochrane Library, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences (LILACS), MedLine/PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, in addition to gray literature, was performed until October 2021. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Analytical Cross-Sectional Studies was used for quality assessment. The certainty of evidence was assessed using the Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (Grade). Fifty-three studies with 4868 participants were included, and 42 were retained for the random-effects proportion meta-analysis. The methodological quality varied from low to high. The agreement with the BGTs varied from 85.6% (95%CI: 77.5–92.1; p < 0.001; I 2 = 93.6%; 16 studies; n = 1399) for tell-show-do to 25.7% (95%CI: 17.8–34.4; p < 0.001; I 2 = 90.4%; 12 studies; n = 1129) for passive protective stabilization among non-SHCN children’s parents; meanwhile, among the parents of SHCN children, it varied from 89.1% (95%CI: 56.1–99.7; p < 0.001; I 2 = 95.7%; 3 studies; n = 454) for tell-show-do to 29.1% (95%CI: 11.8–50.0; p = 0.001; I 2 = 84.8%; 3 studies; n = 263) for general anesthesia. The effect estimates varied greatly, as substantial heterogeneity across studies was observed, thus limiting the confidence in the results. Parents were more likely to agree with basic BGTs over advanced BGTs, with very low certainty of evidence. Dentists should discuss BGT options with parents. Protocol registration: PROSPERO CRD42018103834.
id SBPQO-1_b306be231de7721c4279307e61669c39
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1806-83242022000100953
network_acronym_str SBPQO-1
network_name_str Brazilian Oral Research
repository_id_str
spelling Parental acceptance toward behavior guidance techniques for pediatric dental visits: a meta-analysisParentsBehaviorSystematic ReviewDental Care for DisabledPediatricsAbstract This study aimed to answer the following question: What is the proportion of acceptance reported by parents toward pediatric behavior guidance techniques (BGTs)? Observational studies that evaluated parental acceptance of BGTs during pediatric dental visits among parents of non-special health care need (non-SHCN) and SHCN children were included. A search of the Cochrane Library, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences (LILACS), MedLine/PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, in addition to gray literature, was performed until October 2021. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Analytical Cross-Sectional Studies was used for quality assessment. The certainty of evidence was assessed using the Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (Grade). Fifty-three studies with 4868 participants were included, and 42 were retained for the random-effects proportion meta-analysis. The methodological quality varied from low to high. The agreement with the BGTs varied from 85.6% (95%CI: 77.5–92.1; p < 0.001; I 2 = 93.6%; 16 studies; n = 1399) for tell-show-do to 25.7% (95%CI: 17.8–34.4; p < 0.001; I 2 = 90.4%; 12 studies; n = 1129) for passive protective stabilization among non-SHCN children’s parents; meanwhile, among the parents of SHCN children, it varied from 89.1% (95%CI: 56.1–99.7; p < 0.001; I 2 = 95.7%; 3 studies; n = 454) for tell-show-do to 29.1% (95%CI: 11.8–50.0; p = 0.001; I 2 = 84.8%; 3 studies; n = 263) for general anesthesia. The effect estimates varied greatly, as substantial heterogeneity across studies was observed, thus limiting the confidence in the results. Parents were more likely to agree with basic BGTs over advanced BGTs, with very low certainty of evidence. Dentists should discuss BGT options with parents. Protocol registration: PROSPERO CRD42018103834.Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242022000100953Brazilian Oral Research v.36 2022reponame:Brazilian Oral Researchinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)instacron:SBPQO10.1590/1807-3107bor-2022.vol36.0127info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMASSIGNAN,CarlaSOARES,Josiane PezziniPIRES,Maria Marlene de SouzaDICK,BrucePORPORATTI,André LuísCANTO,Graziela De LucaBOLAN,Micheleeng2022-11-07T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1806-83242022000100953Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bor/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppob@edu.usp.br||bor@sbpqo.org.br1807-31071806-8324opendoar:2022-11-07T00:00Brazilian Oral Research - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Parental acceptance toward behavior guidance techniques for pediatric dental visits: a meta-analysis
title Parental acceptance toward behavior guidance techniques for pediatric dental visits: a meta-analysis
spellingShingle Parental acceptance toward behavior guidance techniques for pediatric dental visits: a meta-analysis
MASSIGNAN,Carla
Parents
Behavior
Systematic Review
Dental Care for Disabled
Pediatrics
title_short Parental acceptance toward behavior guidance techniques for pediatric dental visits: a meta-analysis
title_full Parental acceptance toward behavior guidance techniques for pediatric dental visits: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr Parental acceptance toward behavior guidance techniques for pediatric dental visits: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Parental acceptance toward behavior guidance techniques for pediatric dental visits: a meta-analysis
title_sort Parental acceptance toward behavior guidance techniques for pediatric dental visits: a meta-analysis
author MASSIGNAN,Carla
author_facet MASSIGNAN,Carla
SOARES,Josiane Pezzini
PIRES,Maria Marlene de Souza
DICK,Bruce
PORPORATTI,André Luís
CANTO,Graziela De Luca
BOLAN,Michele
author_role author
author2 SOARES,Josiane Pezzini
PIRES,Maria Marlene de Souza
DICK,Bruce
PORPORATTI,André Luís
CANTO,Graziela De Luca
BOLAN,Michele
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv MASSIGNAN,Carla
SOARES,Josiane Pezzini
PIRES,Maria Marlene de Souza
DICK,Bruce
PORPORATTI,André Luís
CANTO,Graziela De Luca
BOLAN,Michele
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Parents
Behavior
Systematic Review
Dental Care for Disabled
Pediatrics
topic Parents
Behavior
Systematic Review
Dental Care for Disabled
Pediatrics
description Abstract This study aimed to answer the following question: What is the proportion of acceptance reported by parents toward pediatric behavior guidance techniques (BGTs)? Observational studies that evaluated parental acceptance of BGTs during pediatric dental visits among parents of non-special health care need (non-SHCN) and SHCN children were included. A search of the Cochrane Library, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences (LILACS), MedLine/PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, in addition to gray literature, was performed until October 2021. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Analytical Cross-Sectional Studies was used for quality assessment. The certainty of evidence was assessed using the Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (Grade). Fifty-three studies with 4868 participants were included, and 42 were retained for the random-effects proportion meta-analysis. The methodological quality varied from low to high. The agreement with the BGTs varied from 85.6% (95%CI: 77.5–92.1; p < 0.001; I 2 = 93.6%; 16 studies; n = 1399) for tell-show-do to 25.7% (95%CI: 17.8–34.4; p < 0.001; I 2 = 90.4%; 12 studies; n = 1129) for passive protective stabilization among non-SHCN children’s parents; meanwhile, among the parents of SHCN children, it varied from 89.1% (95%CI: 56.1–99.7; p < 0.001; I 2 = 95.7%; 3 studies; n = 454) for tell-show-do to 29.1% (95%CI: 11.8–50.0; p = 0.001; I 2 = 84.8%; 3 studies; n = 263) for general anesthesia. The effect estimates varied greatly, as substantial heterogeneity across studies was observed, thus limiting the confidence in the results. Parents were more likely to agree with basic BGTs over advanced BGTs, with very low certainty of evidence. Dentists should discuss BGT options with parents. Protocol registration: PROSPERO CRD42018103834.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242022000100953
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242022000100953
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2022.vol36.0127
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Oral Research v.36 2022
reponame:Brazilian Oral Research
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
instacron:SBPQO
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
instacron_str SBPQO
institution SBPQO
reponame_str Brazilian Oral Research
collection Brazilian Oral Research
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Oral Research - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv pob@edu.usp.br||bor@sbpqo.org.br
_version_ 1750318328564416512