Drying protocol influence on the bond strength and apical sealing of three different endodontic sealers

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: PAULA,Adrianne Calixto Freire de
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: BRITO-JÚNIOR,Manoel, ARAÚJO,Carla Cristina Camilo, SOUSA-NETO,Manoel Damião, CRUZ-FILHO,Antonio Miranda da
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Oral Research
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242016000100248
Resumo: Abstract The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of drying protocols (DP) on the apical sealing (AS) and on the bond strength (BS) of teeth filled with different sealers. The root canals of one hundred and fifty-six roots of maxillary canines were prepared with Reciproc rotary files (R50). The teeth were randomly divided into four groups (n = 39), according to the DP: GI–paper points; GII–70% isopropyl alcohol + aspiration with NaviTip points; GIII–95% ethanol + paper points; GIV–EndoVac + paper points. Each group was divided into subgroups, according to the sealer used: AH Plus, Sealapex and MTA Fillapex, using a single-cone technique. Evaluation of AS and BS was performed with fluid filtration (FF) and push-out (PO) methods, respectively. The PO test consisted of sectioning the roots, and subjecting a single slice from each third to testing and analysis for failure type. The data was submitted to two-way and three-way variance analysis (ANOVA) and Tukey (α = 5%). The AS showed no drying protocol influence. The FF results revealed a statistically significant difference between MTA and Sealapex (p < 0.05) sealers. The BS test values showed that there was no statistical significant difference among the canal thirds (p > 0.05), but that there was such a difference among the sealers (p < 0.05), among the protocols (p < 0.05), and in the interaction between sealers and protocols (p < 0.05). AH Plus revealed the highest BS values among the sealers; the highest BS results for the sealers occurred with the specimens used with isopropyl alcohol, compared with ethanol and EndoVac.
id SBPQO-1_c4771425dffb2a51414d2d0bf0ce4d87
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1806-83242016000100248
network_acronym_str SBPQO-1
network_name_str Brazilian Oral Research
repository_id_str
spelling Drying protocol influence on the bond strength and apical sealing of three different endodontic sealersRoot Canal TherapyWettabilityAdhesivenesAbstract The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of drying protocols (DP) on the apical sealing (AS) and on the bond strength (BS) of teeth filled with different sealers. The root canals of one hundred and fifty-six roots of maxillary canines were prepared with Reciproc rotary files (R50). The teeth were randomly divided into four groups (n = 39), according to the DP: GI–paper points; GII–70% isopropyl alcohol + aspiration with NaviTip points; GIII–95% ethanol + paper points; GIV–EndoVac + paper points. Each group was divided into subgroups, according to the sealer used: AH Plus, Sealapex and MTA Fillapex, using a single-cone technique. Evaluation of AS and BS was performed with fluid filtration (FF) and push-out (PO) methods, respectively. The PO test consisted of sectioning the roots, and subjecting a single slice from each third to testing and analysis for failure type. The data was submitted to two-way and three-way variance analysis (ANOVA) and Tukey (α = 5%). The AS showed no drying protocol influence. The FF results revealed a statistically significant difference between MTA and Sealapex (p < 0.05) sealers. The BS test values showed that there was no statistical significant difference among the canal thirds (p > 0.05), but that there was such a difference among the sealers (p < 0.05), among the protocols (p < 0.05), and in the interaction between sealers and protocols (p < 0.05). AH Plus revealed the highest BS values among the sealers; the highest BS results for the sealers occurred with the specimens used with isopropyl alcohol, compared with ethanol and EndoVac.Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO2016-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242016000100248Brazilian Oral Research v.30 n.1 2016reponame:Brazilian Oral Researchinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)instacron:SBPQO10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2016.vol30.0050info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPAULA,Adrianne Calixto Freire deBRITO-JÚNIOR,ManoelARAÚJO,Carla Cristina CamiloSOUSA-NETO,Manoel DamiãoCRUZ-FILHO,Antonio Miranda daeng2016-08-15T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1806-83242016000100248Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bor/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppob@edu.usp.br||bor@sbpqo.org.br1807-31071806-8324opendoar:2016-08-15T00:00Brazilian Oral Research - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Drying protocol influence on the bond strength and apical sealing of three different endodontic sealers
title Drying protocol influence on the bond strength and apical sealing of three different endodontic sealers
spellingShingle Drying protocol influence on the bond strength and apical sealing of three different endodontic sealers
PAULA,Adrianne Calixto Freire de
Root Canal Therapy
Wettability
Adhesivenes
title_short Drying protocol influence on the bond strength and apical sealing of three different endodontic sealers
title_full Drying protocol influence on the bond strength and apical sealing of three different endodontic sealers
title_fullStr Drying protocol influence on the bond strength and apical sealing of three different endodontic sealers
title_full_unstemmed Drying protocol influence on the bond strength and apical sealing of three different endodontic sealers
title_sort Drying protocol influence on the bond strength and apical sealing of three different endodontic sealers
author PAULA,Adrianne Calixto Freire de
author_facet PAULA,Adrianne Calixto Freire de
BRITO-JÚNIOR,Manoel
ARAÚJO,Carla Cristina Camilo
SOUSA-NETO,Manoel Damião
CRUZ-FILHO,Antonio Miranda da
author_role author
author2 BRITO-JÚNIOR,Manoel
ARAÚJO,Carla Cristina Camilo
SOUSA-NETO,Manoel Damião
CRUZ-FILHO,Antonio Miranda da
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv PAULA,Adrianne Calixto Freire de
BRITO-JÚNIOR,Manoel
ARAÚJO,Carla Cristina Camilo
SOUSA-NETO,Manoel Damião
CRUZ-FILHO,Antonio Miranda da
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Root Canal Therapy
Wettability
Adhesivenes
topic Root Canal Therapy
Wettability
Adhesivenes
description Abstract The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of drying protocols (DP) on the apical sealing (AS) and on the bond strength (BS) of teeth filled with different sealers. The root canals of one hundred and fifty-six roots of maxillary canines were prepared with Reciproc rotary files (R50). The teeth were randomly divided into four groups (n = 39), according to the DP: GI–paper points; GII–70% isopropyl alcohol + aspiration with NaviTip points; GIII–95% ethanol + paper points; GIV–EndoVac + paper points. Each group was divided into subgroups, according to the sealer used: AH Plus, Sealapex and MTA Fillapex, using a single-cone technique. Evaluation of AS and BS was performed with fluid filtration (FF) and push-out (PO) methods, respectively. The PO test consisted of sectioning the roots, and subjecting a single slice from each third to testing and analysis for failure type. The data was submitted to two-way and three-way variance analysis (ANOVA) and Tukey (α = 5%). The AS showed no drying protocol influence. The FF results revealed a statistically significant difference between MTA and Sealapex (p < 0.05) sealers. The BS test values showed that there was no statistical significant difference among the canal thirds (p > 0.05), but that there was such a difference among the sealers (p < 0.05), among the protocols (p < 0.05), and in the interaction between sealers and protocols (p < 0.05). AH Plus revealed the highest BS values among the sealers; the highest BS results for the sealers occurred with the specimens used with isopropyl alcohol, compared with ethanol and EndoVac.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242016000100248
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242016000100248
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2016.vol30.0050
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Oral Research v.30 n.1 2016
reponame:Brazilian Oral Research
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
instacron:SBPQO
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
instacron_str SBPQO
institution SBPQO
reponame_str Brazilian Oral Research
collection Brazilian Oral Research
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Oral Research - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv pob@edu.usp.br||bor@sbpqo.org.br
_version_ 1750318324737114112