Drying protocol influence on the bond strength and apical sealing of three different endodontic sealers
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Oral Research |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242016000100248 |
Resumo: | Abstract The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of drying protocols (DP) on the apical sealing (AS) and on the bond strength (BS) of teeth filled with different sealers. The root canals of one hundred and fifty-six roots of maxillary canines were prepared with Reciproc rotary files (R50). The teeth were randomly divided into four groups (n = 39), according to the DP: GI–paper points; GII–70% isopropyl alcohol + aspiration with NaviTip points; GIII–95% ethanol + paper points; GIV–EndoVac + paper points. Each group was divided into subgroups, according to the sealer used: AH Plus, Sealapex and MTA Fillapex, using a single-cone technique. Evaluation of AS and BS was performed with fluid filtration (FF) and push-out (PO) methods, respectively. The PO test consisted of sectioning the roots, and subjecting a single slice from each third to testing and analysis for failure type. The data was submitted to two-way and three-way variance analysis (ANOVA) and Tukey (α = 5%). The AS showed no drying protocol influence. The FF results revealed a statistically significant difference between MTA and Sealapex (p < 0.05) sealers. The BS test values showed that there was no statistical significant difference among the canal thirds (p > 0.05), but that there was such a difference among the sealers (p < 0.05), among the protocols (p < 0.05), and in the interaction between sealers and protocols (p < 0.05). AH Plus revealed the highest BS values among the sealers; the highest BS results for the sealers occurred with the specimens used with isopropyl alcohol, compared with ethanol and EndoVac. |
id |
SBPQO-1_c4771425dffb2a51414d2d0bf0ce4d87 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1806-83242016000100248 |
network_acronym_str |
SBPQO-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Oral Research |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Drying protocol influence on the bond strength and apical sealing of three different endodontic sealersRoot Canal TherapyWettabilityAdhesivenesAbstract The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of drying protocols (DP) on the apical sealing (AS) and on the bond strength (BS) of teeth filled with different sealers. The root canals of one hundred and fifty-six roots of maxillary canines were prepared with Reciproc rotary files (R50). The teeth were randomly divided into four groups (n = 39), according to the DP: GI–paper points; GII–70% isopropyl alcohol + aspiration with NaviTip points; GIII–95% ethanol + paper points; GIV–EndoVac + paper points. Each group was divided into subgroups, according to the sealer used: AH Plus, Sealapex and MTA Fillapex, using a single-cone technique. Evaluation of AS and BS was performed with fluid filtration (FF) and push-out (PO) methods, respectively. The PO test consisted of sectioning the roots, and subjecting a single slice from each third to testing and analysis for failure type. The data was submitted to two-way and three-way variance analysis (ANOVA) and Tukey (α = 5%). The AS showed no drying protocol influence. The FF results revealed a statistically significant difference between MTA and Sealapex (p < 0.05) sealers. The BS test values showed that there was no statistical significant difference among the canal thirds (p > 0.05), but that there was such a difference among the sealers (p < 0.05), among the protocols (p < 0.05), and in the interaction between sealers and protocols (p < 0.05). AH Plus revealed the highest BS values among the sealers; the highest BS results for the sealers occurred with the specimens used with isopropyl alcohol, compared with ethanol and EndoVac.Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO2016-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242016000100248Brazilian Oral Research v.30 n.1 2016reponame:Brazilian Oral Researchinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)instacron:SBPQO10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2016.vol30.0050info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPAULA,Adrianne Calixto Freire deBRITO-JÚNIOR,ManoelARAÚJO,Carla Cristina CamiloSOUSA-NETO,Manoel DamiãoCRUZ-FILHO,Antonio Miranda daeng2016-08-15T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1806-83242016000100248Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bor/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppob@edu.usp.br||bor@sbpqo.org.br1807-31071806-8324opendoar:2016-08-15T00:00Brazilian Oral Research - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Drying protocol influence on the bond strength and apical sealing of three different endodontic sealers |
title |
Drying protocol influence on the bond strength and apical sealing of three different endodontic sealers |
spellingShingle |
Drying protocol influence on the bond strength and apical sealing of three different endodontic sealers PAULA,Adrianne Calixto Freire de Root Canal Therapy Wettability Adhesivenes |
title_short |
Drying protocol influence on the bond strength and apical sealing of three different endodontic sealers |
title_full |
Drying protocol influence on the bond strength and apical sealing of three different endodontic sealers |
title_fullStr |
Drying protocol influence on the bond strength and apical sealing of three different endodontic sealers |
title_full_unstemmed |
Drying protocol influence on the bond strength and apical sealing of three different endodontic sealers |
title_sort |
Drying protocol influence on the bond strength and apical sealing of three different endodontic sealers |
author |
PAULA,Adrianne Calixto Freire de |
author_facet |
PAULA,Adrianne Calixto Freire de BRITO-JÚNIOR,Manoel ARAÚJO,Carla Cristina Camilo SOUSA-NETO,Manoel Damião CRUZ-FILHO,Antonio Miranda da |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
BRITO-JÚNIOR,Manoel ARAÚJO,Carla Cristina Camilo SOUSA-NETO,Manoel Damião CRUZ-FILHO,Antonio Miranda da |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
PAULA,Adrianne Calixto Freire de BRITO-JÚNIOR,Manoel ARAÚJO,Carla Cristina Camilo SOUSA-NETO,Manoel Damião CRUZ-FILHO,Antonio Miranda da |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Root Canal Therapy Wettability Adhesivenes |
topic |
Root Canal Therapy Wettability Adhesivenes |
description |
Abstract The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of drying protocols (DP) on the apical sealing (AS) and on the bond strength (BS) of teeth filled with different sealers. The root canals of one hundred and fifty-six roots of maxillary canines were prepared with Reciproc rotary files (R50). The teeth were randomly divided into four groups (n = 39), according to the DP: GI–paper points; GII–70% isopropyl alcohol + aspiration with NaviTip points; GIII–95% ethanol + paper points; GIV–EndoVac + paper points. Each group was divided into subgroups, according to the sealer used: AH Plus, Sealapex and MTA Fillapex, using a single-cone technique. Evaluation of AS and BS was performed with fluid filtration (FF) and push-out (PO) methods, respectively. The PO test consisted of sectioning the roots, and subjecting a single slice from each third to testing and analysis for failure type. The data was submitted to two-way and three-way variance analysis (ANOVA) and Tukey (α = 5%). The AS showed no drying protocol influence. The FF results revealed a statistically significant difference between MTA and Sealapex (p < 0.05) sealers. The BS test values showed that there was no statistical significant difference among the canal thirds (p > 0.05), but that there was such a difference among the sealers (p < 0.05), among the protocols (p < 0.05), and in the interaction between sealers and protocols (p < 0.05). AH Plus revealed the highest BS values among the sealers; the highest BS results for the sealers occurred with the specimens used with isopropyl alcohol, compared with ethanol and EndoVac. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242016000100248 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242016000100248 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2016.vol30.0050 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Oral Research v.30 n.1 2016 reponame:Brazilian Oral Research instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO) instacron:SBPQO |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO) |
instacron_str |
SBPQO |
institution |
SBPQO |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Oral Research |
collection |
Brazilian Oral Research |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Oral Research - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
pob@edu.usp.br||bor@sbpqo.org.br |
_version_ |
1750318324737114112 |