Biological and mechanical characterization of commercial and experimental periodontal surgical dressings

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: CONCEIÇÃO,Luciana Domingues
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: CUEVAS-SUÁREZ,Carlos Enrique, PIVA,Evandro, LUND,Rafael Guerra, LEITE,Fabio Renato Manzolli
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Oral Research
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242021000100227
Resumo: Abstract The objective of this study was to evaluate the biocompatibility and mechanical properties of two commercially available and one experimental periodontal dressing materials. The cytotoxicity of Periobond ® , Barricaid ® and one experimental periodontal dressing based on Exothane ® 8 monomer was tested on 3T3/NIH mouse fibroblast. Genotoxicity was assessed by micronuclei formation, and cell alterations were analyzed using light microscopy. Both biological assays were performed using the eluate obtained from specimens after 24, 72, or 168 hours of incubation. Mechanical characterization was assessed through the ultimate tensile strength and the water sorption and solubility tests. The significance level of α = 0.05 was used for all statistical analyses. All the materials promoted a cell viability lower than 60% in all evaluated times. In general, the cell viability was significantly reduced after 72 and 168h of specimens’ incubation. Considering the factor material, there were not statistical differences in the cell viability (p = 0.156). The genotoxicity was not statistically significant among the groups in the different periods of time (p > 0.05). Differences in the ultimate tensile strength values were not statistically significant different among the groups (p = 0.125). Periobond ® showed the higher water sorption values (p < 0.001). Regarding solubility, there were no statistical differences between the groups (p = 0.098). All the periodontal dressing materials evaluated in this study exerted a cytotoxic effect against mouse fibroblasts, and their toxicity became more evident over time. Among the materials evaluated, the experimental light-cure type has shown overall similar properties to the commercial references.
id SBPQO-1_d0207c8282b4a3dc1feb1b38bd251cd3
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1806-83242021000100227
network_acronym_str SBPQO-1
network_name_str Brazilian Oral Research
repository_id_str
spelling Biological and mechanical characterization of commercial and experimental periodontal surgical dressingsPeriodontal DressingsDental MaterialsBiological AssayMechanical TestsIn Vitro TechniquesAbstract The objective of this study was to evaluate the biocompatibility and mechanical properties of two commercially available and one experimental periodontal dressing materials. The cytotoxicity of Periobond ® , Barricaid ® and one experimental periodontal dressing based on Exothane ® 8 monomer was tested on 3T3/NIH mouse fibroblast. Genotoxicity was assessed by micronuclei formation, and cell alterations were analyzed using light microscopy. Both biological assays were performed using the eluate obtained from specimens after 24, 72, or 168 hours of incubation. Mechanical characterization was assessed through the ultimate tensile strength and the water sorption and solubility tests. The significance level of α = 0.05 was used for all statistical analyses. All the materials promoted a cell viability lower than 60% in all evaluated times. In general, the cell viability was significantly reduced after 72 and 168h of specimens’ incubation. Considering the factor material, there were not statistical differences in the cell viability (p = 0.156). The genotoxicity was not statistically significant among the groups in the different periods of time (p > 0.05). Differences in the ultimate tensile strength values were not statistically significant different among the groups (p = 0.125). Periobond ® showed the higher water sorption values (p < 0.001). Regarding solubility, there were no statistical differences between the groups (p = 0.098). All the periodontal dressing materials evaluated in this study exerted a cytotoxic effect against mouse fibroblasts, and their toxicity became more evident over time. Among the materials evaluated, the experimental light-cure type has shown overall similar properties to the commercial references.Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242021000100227Brazilian Oral Research v.35 2021reponame:Brazilian Oral Researchinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)instacron:SBPQO10.1590/1807-3107bor-2021.vol35.0045info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCONCEIÇÃO,Luciana DominguesCUEVAS-SUÁREZ,Carlos EnriquePIVA,EvandroLUND,Rafael GuerraLEITE,Fabio Renato Manzollieng2021-03-01T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1806-83242021000100227Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bor/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppob@edu.usp.br||bor@sbpqo.org.br1807-31071806-8324opendoar:2021-03-01T00:00Brazilian Oral Research - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Biological and mechanical characterization of commercial and experimental periodontal surgical dressings
title Biological and mechanical characterization of commercial and experimental periodontal surgical dressings
spellingShingle Biological and mechanical characterization of commercial and experimental periodontal surgical dressings
CONCEIÇÃO,Luciana Domingues
Periodontal Dressings
Dental Materials
Biological Assay
Mechanical Tests
In Vitro Techniques
title_short Biological and mechanical characterization of commercial and experimental periodontal surgical dressings
title_full Biological and mechanical characterization of commercial and experimental periodontal surgical dressings
title_fullStr Biological and mechanical characterization of commercial and experimental periodontal surgical dressings
title_full_unstemmed Biological and mechanical characterization of commercial and experimental periodontal surgical dressings
title_sort Biological and mechanical characterization of commercial and experimental periodontal surgical dressings
author CONCEIÇÃO,Luciana Domingues
author_facet CONCEIÇÃO,Luciana Domingues
CUEVAS-SUÁREZ,Carlos Enrique
PIVA,Evandro
LUND,Rafael Guerra
LEITE,Fabio Renato Manzolli
author_role author
author2 CUEVAS-SUÁREZ,Carlos Enrique
PIVA,Evandro
LUND,Rafael Guerra
LEITE,Fabio Renato Manzolli
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv CONCEIÇÃO,Luciana Domingues
CUEVAS-SUÁREZ,Carlos Enrique
PIVA,Evandro
LUND,Rafael Guerra
LEITE,Fabio Renato Manzolli
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Periodontal Dressings
Dental Materials
Biological Assay
Mechanical Tests
In Vitro Techniques
topic Periodontal Dressings
Dental Materials
Biological Assay
Mechanical Tests
In Vitro Techniques
description Abstract The objective of this study was to evaluate the biocompatibility and mechanical properties of two commercially available and one experimental periodontal dressing materials. The cytotoxicity of Periobond ® , Barricaid ® and one experimental periodontal dressing based on Exothane ® 8 monomer was tested on 3T3/NIH mouse fibroblast. Genotoxicity was assessed by micronuclei formation, and cell alterations were analyzed using light microscopy. Both biological assays were performed using the eluate obtained from specimens after 24, 72, or 168 hours of incubation. Mechanical characterization was assessed through the ultimate tensile strength and the water sorption and solubility tests. The significance level of α = 0.05 was used for all statistical analyses. All the materials promoted a cell viability lower than 60% in all evaluated times. In general, the cell viability was significantly reduced after 72 and 168h of specimens’ incubation. Considering the factor material, there were not statistical differences in the cell viability (p = 0.156). The genotoxicity was not statistically significant among the groups in the different periods of time (p > 0.05). Differences in the ultimate tensile strength values were not statistically significant different among the groups (p = 0.125). Periobond ® showed the higher water sorption values (p < 0.001). Regarding solubility, there were no statistical differences between the groups (p = 0.098). All the periodontal dressing materials evaluated in this study exerted a cytotoxic effect against mouse fibroblasts, and their toxicity became more evident over time. Among the materials evaluated, the experimental light-cure type has shown overall similar properties to the commercial references.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242021000100227
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242021000100227
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2021.vol35.0045
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Oral Research v.35 2021
reponame:Brazilian Oral Research
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
instacron:SBPQO
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
instacron_str SBPQO
institution SBPQO
reponame_str Brazilian Oral Research
collection Brazilian Oral Research
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Oral Research - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv pob@edu.usp.br||bor@sbpqo.org.br
_version_ 1750318327575609344