Children's discomfort in assessments using different methods for approximal caries detection
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Oral Research |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242012000200002 |
Resumo: | Because discomfort caused by different approximal caries detection methods can influence their performance, the assessment of this discomfort is important. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the discomfort reported by children after the use of different diagnostic methods to detect approximal caries lesions in primary teeth: visual inspection, bitewing radiography, laser fluorescence (DIAGNOdent pen - LFpen) and temporary separation with orthodontic rubbers. Seventy-six children aged 4 to 12 years were examined using these methods. Their discomfort was assessed using the Wong-Baker scale and compared among the methods. Visual inspection caused less discomfort than did other methods. Radiography and the LFpen presented similar levels of discomfort. Older children reported higher discomfort using temporary separation, whereas younger children reported less discomfort with the LFpen. In conclusion, radiographic, temporary separation and LFpen methods provoke higher discomfort than visual inspection. |
id |
SBPQO-1_d5f48ca13aef3b5144536d179e3407cf |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1806-83242012000200002 |
network_acronym_str |
SBPQO-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Oral Research |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Children's discomfort in assessments using different methods for approximal caries detectionSensationDiagnosisDental CariesBecause discomfort caused by different approximal caries detection methods can influence their performance, the assessment of this discomfort is important. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the discomfort reported by children after the use of different diagnostic methods to detect approximal caries lesions in primary teeth: visual inspection, bitewing radiography, laser fluorescence (DIAGNOdent pen - LFpen) and temporary separation with orthodontic rubbers. Seventy-six children aged 4 to 12 years were examined using these methods. Their discomfort was assessed using the Wong-Baker scale and compared among the methods. Visual inspection caused less discomfort than did other methods. Radiography and the LFpen presented similar levels of discomfort. Older children reported higher discomfort using temporary separation, whereas younger children reported less discomfort with the LFpen. In conclusion, radiographic, temporary separation and LFpen methods provoke higher discomfort than visual inspection.Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO2012-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242012000200002Brazilian Oral Research v.26 n.2 2012reponame:Brazilian Oral Researchinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)instacron:SBPQO10.1590/S1806-83242012000200002info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNovaes,Tatiane FernandesMatos,RonilzaRaggio,Daniela PrócidaBraga,Mariana MinatelMendes,Fausto Medeiroseng2012-04-10T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1806-83242012000200002Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bor/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppob@edu.usp.br||bor@sbpqo.org.br1807-31071806-8324opendoar:2012-04-10T00:00Brazilian Oral Research - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Children's discomfort in assessments using different methods for approximal caries detection |
title |
Children's discomfort in assessments using different methods for approximal caries detection |
spellingShingle |
Children's discomfort in assessments using different methods for approximal caries detection Novaes,Tatiane Fernandes Sensation Diagnosis Dental Caries |
title_short |
Children's discomfort in assessments using different methods for approximal caries detection |
title_full |
Children's discomfort in assessments using different methods for approximal caries detection |
title_fullStr |
Children's discomfort in assessments using different methods for approximal caries detection |
title_full_unstemmed |
Children's discomfort in assessments using different methods for approximal caries detection |
title_sort |
Children's discomfort in assessments using different methods for approximal caries detection |
author |
Novaes,Tatiane Fernandes |
author_facet |
Novaes,Tatiane Fernandes Matos,Ronilza Raggio,Daniela Prócida Braga,Mariana Minatel Mendes,Fausto Medeiros |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Matos,Ronilza Raggio,Daniela Prócida Braga,Mariana Minatel Mendes,Fausto Medeiros |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Novaes,Tatiane Fernandes Matos,Ronilza Raggio,Daniela Prócida Braga,Mariana Minatel Mendes,Fausto Medeiros |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Sensation Diagnosis Dental Caries |
topic |
Sensation Diagnosis Dental Caries |
description |
Because discomfort caused by different approximal caries detection methods can influence their performance, the assessment of this discomfort is important. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the discomfort reported by children after the use of different diagnostic methods to detect approximal caries lesions in primary teeth: visual inspection, bitewing radiography, laser fluorescence (DIAGNOdent pen - LFpen) and temporary separation with orthodontic rubbers. Seventy-six children aged 4 to 12 years were examined using these methods. Their discomfort was assessed using the Wong-Baker scale and compared among the methods. Visual inspection caused less discomfort than did other methods. Radiography and the LFpen presented similar levels of discomfort. Older children reported higher discomfort using temporary separation, whereas younger children reported less discomfort with the LFpen. In conclusion, radiographic, temporary separation and LFpen methods provoke higher discomfort than visual inspection. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-04-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242012000200002 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242012000200002 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S1806-83242012000200002 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Oral Research v.26 n.2 2012 reponame:Brazilian Oral Research instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO) instacron:SBPQO |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO) |
instacron_str |
SBPQO |
institution |
SBPQO |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Oral Research |
collection |
Brazilian Oral Research |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Oral Research - Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica (SBPqO) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
pob@edu.usp.br||bor@sbpqo.org.br |
_version_ |
1750318322568658945 |