Effects of the breath stacking technique after upper abdominal surgery: a randomized clinical trial
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-37132022000100205 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the effect of the association of the breath stacking (BS) technique associated with routine physiotherapy on pulmonary function, lung volumes, maximum respiratory pressures, vital signs, peripheral oxygenation, thoracoabdominal mobility, and pain in the surgical incision in patients submitted to upper abdominal surgery during the postoperative period, as well as to analyze BS safety. Methods: This was a randomized clinical trial involving 34 patients divided into a control group (CG; n = 16), who underwent conventional physiotherapy only, and the BS group (BSG; n = 18), who underwent conventional physiotherapy and BS. Both groups performed two daily sessions from postoperative day 2 until hospital discharge. The primary outcomes were FVC and Vt. The safety of BS was assessed by the incidence of gastrointestinal, hemodynamic, and respiratory repercussions. Results: Although FVC significantly increased at hospital discharge in both groups, the effect was greater on the BSG. Significant increases in FEV1, FEV1/FVC ratio, PEF, and FEF25-75% occurred only in the BSG. There were also significant increases in Ve and Vt in the BSG, but not when compared with the CG values at discharge. MIP and MEP significantly increased in both groups, with a greater effect on the BSG. There was a significant decrease in RR, as well as a significant increase in SpO2 only in the BSG. SpO2 acutely increased after BS; however, no changes were observed in the degree of dyspnea, vital signs, or signs of respiratory distress, and no gastrointestinal and hemodynamic repercussions were observed. Conclusions: BS has proven to be safe and effective for recovering pulmonary function; improving lung volumes, maximum respiratory pressures, and peripheral oxygenation; and reducing respiratory work during the postoperative period after upper abdominal surgery. |
id |
SBPT-1_58a376380229d5592d493cd59cf0debc |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1806-37132022000100205 |
network_acronym_str |
SBPT-1 |
network_name_str |
Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Effects of the breath stacking technique after upper abdominal surgery: a randomized clinical trialAbdomen/surgeryPulmonary ventilationPhysical therapy modalitiesABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the effect of the association of the breath stacking (BS) technique associated with routine physiotherapy on pulmonary function, lung volumes, maximum respiratory pressures, vital signs, peripheral oxygenation, thoracoabdominal mobility, and pain in the surgical incision in patients submitted to upper abdominal surgery during the postoperative period, as well as to analyze BS safety. Methods: This was a randomized clinical trial involving 34 patients divided into a control group (CG; n = 16), who underwent conventional physiotherapy only, and the BS group (BSG; n = 18), who underwent conventional physiotherapy and BS. Both groups performed two daily sessions from postoperative day 2 until hospital discharge. The primary outcomes were FVC and Vt. The safety of BS was assessed by the incidence of gastrointestinal, hemodynamic, and respiratory repercussions. Results: Although FVC significantly increased at hospital discharge in both groups, the effect was greater on the BSG. Significant increases in FEV1, FEV1/FVC ratio, PEF, and FEF25-75% occurred only in the BSG. There were also significant increases in Ve and Vt in the BSG, but not when compared with the CG values at discharge. MIP and MEP significantly increased in both groups, with a greater effect on the BSG. There was a significant decrease in RR, as well as a significant increase in SpO2 only in the BSG. SpO2 acutely increased after BS; however, no changes were observed in the degree of dyspnea, vital signs, or signs of respiratory distress, and no gastrointestinal and hemodynamic repercussions were observed. Conclusions: BS has proven to be safe and effective for recovering pulmonary function; improving lung volumes, maximum respiratory pressures, and peripheral oxygenation; and reducing respiratory work during the postoperative period after upper abdominal surgery.Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-37132022000100205Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia v.48 n.1 2022reponame:Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia (SBPT)instacron:SBPT10.36416/1806-3756/e20210280info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFernandes,Débora da LuzRighi,Natiele CamponogaraRubin Neto,Léo JoséBellé,Jéssica MichelonPippi,Caroline MontagnerRibas,Carolina Zeni do MonteNichele,Lidiane de Fátima IlhaSignori,Luis UlissesSilva,Antônio Marcos Vargas daeng2022-03-10T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1806-37132022000100205Revistahttp://www.jornaldepneumologia.com.br/default.aspONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||jbp@jbp.org.br|| jpneumo@jornaldepneumologia.com.br1806-37561806-3713opendoar:2022-03-10T00:00Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia (SBPT)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Effects of the breath stacking technique after upper abdominal surgery: a randomized clinical trial |
title |
Effects of the breath stacking technique after upper abdominal surgery: a randomized clinical trial |
spellingShingle |
Effects of the breath stacking technique after upper abdominal surgery: a randomized clinical trial Fernandes,Débora da Luz Abdomen/surgery Pulmonary ventilation Physical therapy modalities |
title_short |
Effects of the breath stacking technique after upper abdominal surgery: a randomized clinical trial |
title_full |
Effects of the breath stacking technique after upper abdominal surgery: a randomized clinical trial |
title_fullStr |
Effects of the breath stacking technique after upper abdominal surgery: a randomized clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effects of the breath stacking technique after upper abdominal surgery: a randomized clinical trial |
title_sort |
Effects of the breath stacking technique after upper abdominal surgery: a randomized clinical trial |
author |
Fernandes,Débora da Luz |
author_facet |
Fernandes,Débora da Luz Righi,Natiele Camponogara Rubin Neto,Léo José Bellé,Jéssica Michelon Pippi,Caroline Montagner Ribas,Carolina Zeni do Monte Nichele,Lidiane de Fátima Ilha Signori,Luis Ulisses Silva,Antônio Marcos Vargas da |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Righi,Natiele Camponogara Rubin Neto,Léo José Bellé,Jéssica Michelon Pippi,Caroline Montagner Ribas,Carolina Zeni do Monte Nichele,Lidiane de Fátima Ilha Signori,Luis Ulisses Silva,Antônio Marcos Vargas da |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Fernandes,Débora da Luz Righi,Natiele Camponogara Rubin Neto,Léo José Bellé,Jéssica Michelon Pippi,Caroline Montagner Ribas,Carolina Zeni do Monte Nichele,Lidiane de Fátima Ilha Signori,Luis Ulisses Silva,Antônio Marcos Vargas da |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Abdomen/surgery Pulmonary ventilation Physical therapy modalities |
topic |
Abdomen/surgery Pulmonary ventilation Physical therapy modalities |
description |
ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the effect of the association of the breath stacking (BS) technique associated with routine physiotherapy on pulmonary function, lung volumes, maximum respiratory pressures, vital signs, peripheral oxygenation, thoracoabdominal mobility, and pain in the surgical incision in patients submitted to upper abdominal surgery during the postoperative period, as well as to analyze BS safety. Methods: This was a randomized clinical trial involving 34 patients divided into a control group (CG; n = 16), who underwent conventional physiotherapy only, and the BS group (BSG; n = 18), who underwent conventional physiotherapy and BS. Both groups performed two daily sessions from postoperative day 2 until hospital discharge. The primary outcomes were FVC and Vt. The safety of BS was assessed by the incidence of gastrointestinal, hemodynamic, and respiratory repercussions. Results: Although FVC significantly increased at hospital discharge in both groups, the effect was greater on the BSG. Significant increases in FEV1, FEV1/FVC ratio, PEF, and FEF25-75% occurred only in the BSG. There were also significant increases in Ve and Vt in the BSG, but not when compared with the CG values at discharge. MIP and MEP significantly increased in both groups, with a greater effect on the BSG. There was a significant decrease in RR, as well as a significant increase in SpO2 only in the BSG. SpO2 acutely increased after BS; however, no changes were observed in the degree of dyspnea, vital signs, or signs of respiratory distress, and no gastrointestinal and hemodynamic repercussions were observed. Conclusions: BS has proven to be safe and effective for recovering pulmonary function; improving lung volumes, maximum respiratory pressures, and peripheral oxygenation; and reducing respiratory work during the postoperative period after upper abdominal surgery. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-37132022000100205 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-37132022000100205 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.36416/1806-3756/e20210280 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia v.48 n.1 2022 reponame:Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia (SBPT) instacron:SBPT |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia (SBPT) |
instacron_str |
SBPT |
institution |
SBPT |
reponame_str |
Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (Online) |
collection |
Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia (SBPT) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||jbp@jbp.org.br|| jpneumo@jornaldepneumologia.com.br |
_version_ |
1750318348237799424 |