Use of remdesivir in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Tanni,Suzana E
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Silvinato,Antonio, Floriano,Idevaldo, Bacha,Hélio A, Barbosa,Alexandre Naime, Bernardo,Wanderley M
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-37132022000101200
Resumo: ABSTRACT Objective: Studies in the literature regarding the use of remdesivir to treat COVID-19 patients have shown conflicting results. This study sought to answer questions related to the use of remdesivir for the treatment of patients hospitalized with moderate to severe COVID-19. Methods: This was a systematic review and meta-analysis including phase 3 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and observational cohort studies selected from various databases, comparing patients hospitalized with moderate to severe COVID-19 receiving remdesivir and controls. Results: A total of 207 studies were retrieved, 9 of which met the eligibility criteria and were included in the study. The meta-analysis using RCTs alone showed no statistically significant differences regarding mortality or use of mechanical ventilation/extracorporeal membrane oxygenation between remdesivir and control groups, and the quality of evidence was moderate and low, respectively. The use of remdesivir increased the recovery rate by 6% (95% CI, 3-9); p = 0.004) and the clinical improvement rate by 7% (95% CI, 1-14); p = 0.02). Additionally, no significant differences in mortality were found between remdesivir and control groups when the meta-analysis used observational cohort studies alone (risk difference = −0.01 (95% CI, −0.02 to 0.01; p = 0.32), the quality of evidence being moderate, and the risk of adverse events was 4% ([95% CI, −0.08 to 0.01]; p = 0.09). Conclusions: The use of remdesivir for the treatment of patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 had no significant impact on clinically important outcomes.
id SBPT-1_613e501666ff5b65f8d7fb9c97005c9e
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1806-37132022000101200
network_acronym_str SBPT-1
network_name_str Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Use of remdesivir in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysisAntiviral agentsCOVID-19SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT Objective: Studies in the literature regarding the use of remdesivir to treat COVID-19 patients have shown conflicting results. This study sought to answer questions related to the use of remdesivir for the treatment of patients hospitalized with moderate to severe COVID-19. Methods: This was a systematic review and meta-analysis including phase 3 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and observational cohort studies selected from various databases, comparing patients hospitalized with moderate to severe COVID-19 receiving remdesivir and controls. Results: A total of 207 studies were retrieved, 9 of which met the eligibility criteria and were included in the study. The meta-analysis using RCTs alone showed no statistically significant differences regarding mortality or use of mechanical ventilation/extracorporeal membrane oxygenation between remdesivir and control groups, and the quality of evidence was moderate and low, respectively. The use of remdesivir increased the recovery rate by 6% (95% CI, 3-9); p = 0.004) and the clinical improvement rate by 7% (95% CI, 1-14); p = 0.02). Additionally, no significant differences in mortality were found between remdesivir and control groups when the meta-analysis used observational cohort studies alone (risk difference = −0.01 (95% CI, −0.02 to 0.01; p = 0.32), the quality of evidence being moderate, and the risk of adverse events was 4% ([95% CI, −0.08 to 0.01]; p = 0.09). Conclusions: The use of remdesivir for the treatment of patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 had no significant impact on clinically important outcomes.Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-37132022000101200Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia v.48 n.1 2022reponame:Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia (SBPT)instacron:SBPT10.36416/1806-3756/e20210393info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTanni,Suzana ESilvinato,AntonioFloriano,IdevaldoBacha,Hélio ABarbosa,Alexandre NaimeBernardo,Wanderley Meng2022-01-31T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1806-37132022000101200Revistahttp://www.jornaldepneumologia.com.br/default.aspONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||jbp@jbp.org.br|| jpneumo@jornaldepneumologia.com.br1806-37561806-3713opendoar:2022-01-31T00:00Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia (SBPT)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Use of remdesivir in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Use of remdesivir in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis
spellingShingle Use of remdesivir in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Tanni,Suzana E
Antiviral agents
COVID-19
SARS-CoV-2
title_short Use of remdesivir in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Use of remdesivir in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Use of remdesivir in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Use of remdesivir in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort Use of remdesivir in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis
author Tanni,Suzana E
author_facet Tanni,Suzana E
Silvinato,Antonio
Floriano,Idevaldo
Bacha,Hélio A
Barbosa,Alexandre Naime
Bernardo,Wanderley M
author_role author
author2 Silvinato,Antonio
Floriano,Idevaldo
Bacha,Hélio A
Barbosa,Alexandre Naime
Bernardo,Wanderley M
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Tanni,Suzana E
Silvinato,Antonio
Floriano,Idevaldo
Bacha,Hélio A
Barbosa,Alexandre Naime
Bernardo,Wanderley M
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Antiviral agents
COVID-19
SARS-CoV-2
topic Antiviral agents
COVID-19
SARS-CoV-2
description ABSTRACT Objective: Studies in the literature regarding the use of remdesivir to treat COVID-19 patients have shown conflicting results. This study sought to answer questions related to the use of remdesivir for the treatment of patients hospitalized with moderate to severe COVID-19. Methods: This was a systematic review and meta-analysis including phase 3 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and observational cohort studies selected from various databases, comparing patients hospitalized with moderate to severe COVID-19 receiving remdesivir and controls. Results: A total of 207 studies were retrieved, 9 of which met the eligibility criteria and were included in the study. The meta-analysis using RCTs alone showed no statistically significant differences regarding mortality or use of mechanical ventilation/extracorporeal membrane oxygenation between remdesivir and control groups, and the quality of evidence was moderate and low, respectively. The use of remdesivir increased the recovery rate by 6% (95% CI, 3-9); p = 0.004) and the clinical improvement rate by 7% (95% CI, 1-14); p = 0.02). Additionally, no significant differences in mortality were found between remdesivir and control groups when the meta-analysis used observational cohort studies alone (risk difference = −0.01 (95% CI, −0.02 to 0.01; p = 0.32), the quality of evidence being moderate, and the risk of adverse events was 4% ([95% CI, −0.08 to 0.01]; p = 0.09). Conclusions: The use of remdesivir for the treatment of patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 had no significant impact on clinically important outcomes.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-37132022000101200
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-37132022000101200
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.36416/1806-3756/e20210393
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia v.48 n.1 2022
reponame:Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia (SBPT)
instacron:SBPT
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia (SBPT)
instacron_str SBPT
institution SBPT
reponame_str Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (Online)
collection Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia (SBPT)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||jbp@jbp.org.br|| jpneumo@jornaldepneumologia.com.br
_version_ 1750318348240945152