Accuracy of closed pleural biopsy in the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Báez-Saldaña,Renata
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Rumbo-Nava,Uriel, Escobar-Rojas,Araceli, Castillo-González,Patricia, León-Dueñas,Santiago, Aguirre-Pérez,Teresa, Vázquez-Manríquez,María Eugenia
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-37132017000600424
Resumo: ABSTRACT Objective: Previous studies have demonstrated that closed pleural biopsy (CPB) has a sensitivity of less than 60% for diagnosing malignancy. Therefore, controversy has recently emerged regarding the value of CPB as a diagnostic test. Our objective was to assess the accuracy of CPB in diagnosing malignancy in patients with pleural effusion. Methods: This was a prospective 8-year study of individuals who underwent CPB to establish the etiology of pleural effusion. Information on each patient was obtained from anatomopathological reports and medical records. When CPB findings showed malignancy or tuberculosis, the biopsy was considered diagnostic, and that was the definitive diagnosis. In cases in which biopsy histopathological findings were nonspecific, a definitive diagnosis was established on the basis of other diagnostic procedures, such as thoracoscopy, thoracotomy, fiberoptic bronchoscopy, biochemical and cellular measurements in pleural fluid, and/or microbiological tests. The accuracy of CPB was determined with 2 × 2 contingency tables. Results: A total of 1034 biopsies from patients with pleural effusion were studied. Of those, 171 (16.54%) were excluded from the accuracy analysis either because of inadequate samples or insufficient information. The results of the accuracy analysis were as follows: sensitivity, 77%; specificity, 98%; positive predictive value, 99%; negative predictive value, 66%; positive likelihood ratio, 38.5; negative likelihood ratio, 0.23; pre-test probability, 2.13; and post-test probability, 82. Conclusions: CPB is useful in clinical practice as a diagnostic test, because there is an important change from pre-test to post-test probability.
id SBPT-1_d3dce32eae35cea998a381fb9a286e4a
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1806-37132017000600424
network_acronym_str SBPT-1
network_name_str Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Accuracy of closed pleural biopsy in the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusionBiopsyPleural effusion, malignant/diagnosisPleural effusion, malignant/epidemiologyABSTRACT Objective: Previous studies have demonstrated that closed pleural biopsy (CPB) has a sensitivity of less than 60% for diagnosing malignancy. Therefore, controversy has recently emerged regarding the value of CPB as a diagnostic test. Our objective was to assess the accuracy of CPB in diagnosing malignancy in patients with pleural effusion. Methods: This was a prospective 8-year study of individuals who underwent CPB to establish the etiology of pleural effusion. Information on each patient was obtained from anatomopathological reports and medical records. When CPB findings showed malignancy or tuberculosis, the biopsy was considered diagnostic, and that was the definitive diagnosis. In cases in which biopsy histopathological findings were nonspecific, a definitive diagnosis was established on the basis of other diagnostic procedures, such as thoracoscopy, thoracotomy, fiberoptic bronchoscopy, biochemical and cellular measurements in pleural fluid, and/or microbiological tests. The accuracy of CPB was determined with 2 × 2 contingency tables. Results: A total of 1034 biopsies from patients with pleural effusion were studied. Of those, 171 (16.54%) were excluded from the accuracy analysis either because of inadequate samples or insufficient information. The results of the accuracy analysis were as follows: sensitivity, 77%; specificity, 98%; positive predictive value, 99%; negative predictive value, 66%; positive likelihood ratio, 38.5; negative likelihood ratio, 0.23; pre-test probability, 2.13; and post-test probability, 82. Conclusions: CPB is useful in clinical practice as a diagnostic test, because there is an important change from pre-test to post-test probability.Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia2017-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-37132017000600424Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia v.43 n.6 2017reponame:Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia (SBPT)instacron:SBPT10.1590/s1806-37562016000000323info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBáez-Saldaña,RenataRumbo-Nava,UrielEscobar-Rojas,AraceliCastillo-González,PatriciaLeón-Dueñas,SantiagoAguirre-Pérez,TeresaVázquez-Manríquez,María Eugeniaeng2018-10-08T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1806-37132017000600424Revistahttp://www.jornaldepneumologia.com.br/default.aspONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||jbp@jbp.org.br|| jpneumo@jornaldepneumologia.com.br1806-37561806-3713opendoar:2018-10-08T00:00Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia (SBPT)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Accuracy of closed pleural biopsy in the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion
title Accuracy of closed pleural biopsy in the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion
spellingShingle Accuracy of closed pleural biopsy in the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion
Báez-Saldaña,Renata
Biopsy
Pleural effusion, malignant/diagnosis
Pleural effusion, malignant/epidemiology
title_short Accuracy of closed pleural biopsy in the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion
title_full Accuracy of closed pleural biopsy in the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion
title_fullStr Accuracy of closed pleural biopsy in the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of closed pleural biopsy in the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion
title_sort Accuracy of closed pleural biopsy in the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion
author Báez-Saldaña,Renata
author_facet Báez-Saldaña,Renata
Rumbo-Nava,Uriel
Escobar-Rojas,Araceli
Castillo-González,Patricia
León-Dueñas,Santiago
Aguirre-Pérez,Teresa
Vázquez-Manríquez,María Eugenia
author_role author
author2 Rumbo-Nava,Uriel
Escobar-Rojas,Araceli
Castillo-González,Patricia
León-Dueñas,Santiago
Aguirre-Pérez,Teresa
Vázquez-Manríquez,María Eugenia
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Báez-Saldaña,Renata
Rumbo-Nava,Uriel
Escobar-Rojas,Araceli
Castillo-González,Patricia
León-Dueñas,Santiago
Aguirre-Pérez,Teresa
Vázquez-Manríquez,María Eugenia
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Biopsy
Pleural effusion, malignant/diagnosis
Pleural effusion, malignant/epidemiology
topic Biopsy
Pleural effusion, malignant/diagnosis
Pleural effusion, malignant/epidemiology
description ABSTRACT Objective: Previous studies have demonstrated that closed pleural biopsy (CPB) has a sensitivity of less than 60% for diagnosing malignancy. Therefore, controversy has recently emerged regarding the value of CPB as a diagnostic test. Our objective was to assess the accuracy of CPB in diagnosing malignancy in patients with pleural effusion. Methods: This was a prospective 8-year study of individuals who underwent CPB to establish the etiology of pleural effusion. Information on each patient was obtained from anatomopathological reports and medical records. When CPB findings showed malignancy or tuberculosis, the biopsy was considered diagnostic, and that was the definitive diagnosis. In cases in which biopsy histopathological findings were nonspecific, a definitive diagnosis was established on the basis of other diagnostic procedures, such as thoracoscopy, thoracotomy, fiberoptic bronchoscopy, biochemical and cellular measurements in pleural fluid, and/or microbiological tests. The accuracy of CPB was determined with 2 × 2 contingency tables. Results: A total of 1034 biopsies from patients with pleural effusion were studied. Of those, 171 (16.54%) were excluded from the accuracy analysis either because of inadequate samples or insufficient information. The results of the accuracy analysis were as follows: sensitivity, 77%; specificity, 98%; positive predictive value, 99%; negative predictive value, 66%; positive likelihood ratio, 38.5; negative likelihood ratio, 0.23; pre-test probability, 2.13; and post-test probability, 82. Conclusions: CPB is useful in clinical practice as a diagnostic test, because there is an important change from pre-test to post-test probability.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-37132017000600424
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-37132017000600424
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/s1806-37562016000000323
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia v.43 n.6 2017
reponame:Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia (SBPT)
instacron:SBPT
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia (SBPT)
instacron_str SBPT
institution SBPT
reponame_str Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (Online)
collection Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia (SBPT)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||jbp@jbp.org.br|| jpneumo@jornaldepneumologia.com.br
_version_ 1750318346869407744