Is the COPD Assessment Test sensitive for differentiating COPD patients from active smokers and nonsmokers without lung function impairment? A population-based study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Karloh,Manuela
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Rocha,Simone Aparecida Vieira, Pizzichini,Marcia Margaret Menezes, Cavalli,Francine, Matte,Darlan Laurício, Pizzichini,Emilio
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-37132018000300213
Resumo: ABSTRACT Objective: To assess COPD Assessment Test (CAT) scores in adults with and without COPD, as well as to compare the CAT scores for nonsmokers, former smokers, and smokers without COPD with those for patients with COPD. Methods: This was a cross-sectional population-based study (the Respira Floripa study). The study included adults ≥ 40 years of age residing in the city of Florianópolis, Brazil. A total of 846 households were surveyed. In addition to completing the Respira Floripa questionnaire and the CAT, participants underwent pulmonary function testing. Results: We analyzed data on 1,057 participants (88.1% of the predicted sample size). A functional diagnosis of COPD was made in 92 participants (8.7%). Of those, 72% were unaware that they had COPD. The mean CAT score was higher in the group of COPD patients than in that of individuals without COPD (10.6 [95% CI: 8.8-12.4] vs. 6.6 [95% CI: 6.1-7.0]; p < 0.01). Individual item scores were significantly higher in the patients with COPD than in the individuals without COPD (p < 0.001), the exception being the scores for the items related to sleep (p = 0.13) and energy (p = 0.08). The mean CAT score was higher in the group of COPD patients than in nonsmokers (5.8 [95% CI: 5.3-6.4]) and former smokers (6.4 [95% CI: 5.6-7.2]; p < 0.05). However, there were no significant differences in the mean CAT score between the group of COPD patients and smokers without COPD (9.5 [95% CI: 8.2-10.8]; p > 0.05), the exception being the mean scores for confidence leaving home (p = 0.02). Conclusions: CAT scores were higher in the group of patients with COPD than in nonsmokers and former smokers without COPD. However, there were no significant differences in CAT scores between COPD patients and smokers without COPD. Smokers with an FEV1/FVC ratio > 0.70 have impaired health status and respiratory symptoms similar to those observed in COPD patients.
id SBPT-1_e16e38a714ae87485b6d8944fab0fff4
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1806-37132018000300213
network_acronym_str SBPT-1
network_name_str Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Is the COPD Assessment Test sensitive for differentiating COPD patients from active smokers and nonsmokers without lung function impairment? A population-based studyRespiratory function testsPulmonary disease, chronic obstructiveSmokingABSTRACT Objective: To assess COPD Assessment Test (CAT) scores in adults with and without COPD, as well as to compare the CAT scores for nonsmokers, former smokers, and smokers without COPD with those for patients with COPD. Methods: This was a cross-sectional population-based study (the Respira Floripa study). The study included adults ≥ 40 years of age residing in the city of Florianópolis, Brazil. A total of 846 households were surveyed. In addition to completing the Respira Floripa questionnaire and the CAT, participants underwent pulmonary function testing. Results: We analyzed data on 1,057 participants (88.1% of the predicted sample size). A functional diagnosis of COPD was made in 92 participants (8.7%). Of those, 72% were unaware that they had COPD. The mean CAT score was higher in the group of COPD patients than in that of individuals without COPD (10.6 [95% CI: 8.8-12.4] vs. 6.6 [95% CI: 6.1-7.0]; p < 0.01). Individual item scores were significantly higher in the patients with COPD than in the individuals without COPD (p < 0.001), the exception being the scores for the items related to sleep (p = 0.13) and energy (p = 0.08). The mean CAT score was higher in the group of COPD patients than in nonsmokers (5.8 [95% CI: 5.3-6.4]) and former smokers (6.4 [95% CI: 5.6-7.2]; p < 0.05). However, there were no significant differences in the mean CAT score between the group of COPD patients and smokers without COPD (9.5 [95% CI: 8.2-10.8]; p > 0.05), the exception being the mean scores for confidence leaving home (p = 0.02). Conclusions: CAT scores were higher in the group of patients with COPD than in nonsmokers and former smokers without COPD. However, there were no significant differences in CAT scores between COPD patients and smokers without COPD. Smokers with an FEV1/FVC ratio > 0.70 have impaired health status and respiratory symptoms similar to those observed in COPD patients.Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia2018-05-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-37132018000300213Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia v.44 n.3 2018reponame:Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia (SBPT)instacron:SBPT10.1590/s1806-37562017000000149info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKarloh,ManuelaRocha,Simone Aparecida VieiraPizzichini,Marcia Margaret MenezesCavalli,FrancineMatte,Darlan LaurícioPizzichini,Emilioeng2018-07-16T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1806-37132018000300213Revistahttp://www.jornaldepneumologia.com.br/default.aspONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||jbp@jbp.org.br|| jpneumo@jornaldepneumologia.com.br1806-37561806-3713opendoar:2018-07-16T00:00Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia (SBPT)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Is the COPD Assessment Test sensitive for differentiating COPD patients from active smokers and nonsmokers without lung function impairment? A population-based study
title Is the COPD Assessment Test sensitive for differentiating COPD patients from active smokers and nonsmokers without lung function impairment? A population-based study
spellingShingle Is the COPD Assessment Test sensitive for differentiating COPD patients from active smokers and nonsmokers without lung function impairment? A population-based study
Karloh,Manuela
Respiratory function tests
Pulmonary disease, chronic obstructive
Smoking
title_short Is the COPD Assessment Test sensitive for differentiating COPD patients from active smokers and nonsmokers without lung function impairment? A population-based study
title_full Is the COPD Assessment Test sensitive for differentiating COPD patients from active smokers and nonsmokers without lung function impairment? A population-based study
title_fullStr Is the COPD Assessment Test sensitive for differentiating COPD patients from active smokers and nonsmokers without lung function impairment? A population-based study
title_full_unstemmed Is the COPD Assessment Test sensitive for differentiating COPD patients from active smokers and nonsmokers without lung function impairment? A population-based study
title_sort Is the COPD Assessment Test sensitive for differentiating COPD patients from active smokers and nonsmokers without lung function impairment? A population-based study
author Karloh,Manuela
author_facet Karloh,Manuela
Rocha,Simone Aparecida Vieira
Pizzichini,Marcia Margaret Menezes
Cavalli,Francine
Matte,Darlan Laurício
Pizzichini,Emilio
author_role author
author2 Rocha,Simone Aparecida Vieira
Pizzichini,Marcia Margaret Menezes
Cavalli,Francine
Matte,Darlan Laurício
Pizzichini,Emilio
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Karloh,Manuela
Rocha,Simone Aparecida Vieira
Pizzichini,Marcia Margaret Menezes
Cavalli,Francine
Matte,Darlan Laurício
Pizzichini,Emilio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Respiratory function tests
Pulmonary disease, chronic obstructive
Smoking
topic Respiratory function tests
Pulmonary disease, chronic obstructive
Smoking
description ABSTRACT Objective: To assess COPD Assessment Test (CAT) scores in adults with and without COPD, as well as to compare the CAT scores for nonsmokers, former smokers, and smokers without COPD with those for patients with COPD. Methods: This was a cross-sectional population-based study (the Respira Floripa study). The study included adults ≥ 40 years of age residing in the city of Florianópolis, Brazil. A total of 846 households were surveyed. In addition to completing the Respira Floripa questionnaire and the CAT, participants underwent pulmonary function testing. Results: We analyzed data on 1,057 participants (88.1% of the predicted sample size). A functional diagnosis of COPD was made in 92 participants (8.7%). Of those, 72% were unaware that they had COPD. The mean CAT score was higher in the group of COPD patients than in that of individuals without COPD (10.6 [95% CI: 8.8-12.4] vs. 6.6 [95% CI: 6.1-7.0]; p < 0.01). Individual item scores were significantly higher in the patients with COPD than in the individuals without COPD (p < 0.001), the exception being the scores for the items related to sleep (p = 0.13) and energy (p = 0.08). The mean CAT score was higher in the group of COPD patients than in nonsmokers (5.8 [95% CI: 5.3-6.4]) and former smokers (6.4 [95% CI: 5.6-7.2]; p < 0.05). However, there were no significant differences in the mean CAT score between the group of COPD patients and smokers without COPD (9.5 [95% CI: 8.2-10.8]; p > 0.05), the exception being the mean scores for confidence leaving home (p = 0.02). Conclusions: CAT scores were higher in the group of patients with COPD than in nonsmokers and former smokers without COPD. However, there were no significant differences in CAT scores between COPD patients and smokers without COPD. Smokers with an FEV1/FVC ratio > 0.70 have impaired health status and respiratory symptoms similar to those observed in COPD patients.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-05-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-37132018000300213
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-37132018000300213
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/s1806-37562017000000149
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia v.44 n.3 2018
reponame:Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia (SBPT)
instacron:SBPT
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia (SBPT)
instacron_str SBPT
institution SBPT
reponame_str Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (Online)
collection Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia (SBPT)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||jbp@jbp.org.br|| jpneumo@jornaldepneumologia.com.br
_version_ 1750318347225923584