Influence of tomato components in the quantification of four pesticides by gas chromatography
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-50532012000200015 |
Resumo: | The matrix effect in gas chromatographic analysis is attributed to the presence of coextractives in organic phase obtained in the extraction process. This work reports the quantification study of increased chromatographic response of four pesticides in organic extracts of tomato extracted by solid-liquid extraction with low temperature purification (SLE-LTP). The pesticides chlorpyrifos, λ-cyhalothrin, cypermethrin and deltamethrin showed an increased chromatographic response after the saturation of the chromatographic system with multiple injections of organic extracts of tomato. It was also found that the greater the retention time, the greater the matrix effect, and that the internal standard reduces the matrix effect but does not eliminate it. The matrix effect measured by the analytical curves (in acetonitrile and matrix extract) was 27% for chlorpyrifos, 46% for λ-cyhalothrin, 96% for cypermethrin and 180% for deltamethrin. |
id |
SBQ-2_a814a390fd2b48132c3f5bfa35f7b9b7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0103-50532012000200015 |
network_acronym_str |
SBQ-2 |
network_name_str |
Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Influence of tomato components in the quantification of four pesticides by gas chromatographymatrix effectpesticideGC/ECDtomatoorganic extractThe matrix effect in gas chromatographic analysis is attributed to the presence of coextractives in organic phase obtained in the extraction process. This work reports the quantification study of increased chromatographic response of four pesticides in organic extracts of tomato extracted by solid-liquid extraction with low temperature purification (SLE-LTP). The pesticides chlorpyrifos, λ-cyhalothrin, cypermethrin and deltamethrin showed an increased chromatographic response after the saturation of the chromatographic system with multiple injections of organic extracts of tomato. It was also found that the greater the retention time, the greater the matrix effect, and that the internal standard reduces the matrix effect but does not eliminate it. The matrix effect measured by the analytical curves (in acetonitrile and matrix extract) was 27% for chlorpyrifos, 46% for λ-cyhalothrin, 96% for cypermethrin and 180% for deltamethrin.Sociedade Brasileira de Química2012-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-50532012000200015Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society v.23 n.2 2012reponame:Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Química (SBQ)instacron:SBQ10.1590/S0103-50532012000200015info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPinho,Gevany P.Neves,Antônio A.Queiroz,Maria Eliana L. R.Silvério,Flaviano O.Marthe,Deyse B.eng2012-03-02T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0103-50532012000200015Revistahttp://jbcs.sbq.org.brONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||office@jbcs.sbq.org.br1678-47900103-5053opendoar:2012-03-02T00:00Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Química (SBQ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Influence of tomato components in the quantification of four pesticides by gas chromatography |
title |
Influence of tomato components in the quantification of four pesticides by gas chromatography |
spellingShingle |
Influence of tomato components in the quantification of four pesticides by gas chromatography Pinho,Gevany P. matrix effect pesticide GC/ECD tomato organic extract |
title_short |
Influence of tomato components in the quantification of four pesticides by gas chromatography |
title_full |
Influence of tomato components in the quantification of four pesticides by gas chromatography |
title_fullStr |
Influence of tomato components in the quantification of four pesticides by gas chromatography |
title_full_unstemmed |
Influence of tomato components in the quantification of four pesticides by gas chromatography |
title_sort |
Influence of tomato components in the quantification of four pesticides by gas chromatography |
author |
Pinho,Gevany P. |
author_facet |
Pinho,Gevany P. Neves,Antônio A. Queiroz,Maria Eliana L. R. Silvério,Flaviano O. Marthe,Deyse B. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Neves,Antônio A. Queiroz,Maria Eliana L. R. Silvério,Flaviano O. Marthe,Deyse B. |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pinho,Gevany P. Neves,Antônio A. Queiroz,Maria Eliana L. R. Silvério,Flaviano O. Marthe,Deyse B. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
matrix effect pesticide GC/ECD tomato organic extract |
topic |
matrix effect pesticide GC/ECD tomato organic extract |
description |
The matrix effect in gas chromatographic analysis is attributed to the presence of coextractives in organic phase obtained in the extraction process. This work reports the quantification study of increased chromatographic response of four pesticides in organic extracts of tomato extracted by solid-liquid extraction with low temperature purification (SLE-LTP). The pesticides chlorpyrifos, λ-cyhalothrin, cypermethrin and deltamethrin showed an increased chromatographic response after the saturation of the chromatographic system with multiple injections of organic extracts of tomato. It was also found that the greater the retention time, the greater the matrix effect, and that the internal standard reduces the matrix effect but does not eliminate it. The matrix effect measured by the analytical curves (in acetonitrile and matrix extract) was 27% for chlorpyrifos, 46% for λ-cyhalothrin, 96% for cypermethrin and 180% for deltamethrin. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-02-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-50532012000200015 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-50532012000200015 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S0103-50532012000200015 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Química |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Química |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society v.23 n.2 2012 reponame:Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Química (SBQ) instacron:SBQ |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Química (SBQ) |
instacron_str |
SBQ |
institution |
SBQ |
reponame_str |
Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society (Online) |
collection |
Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Química (SBQ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||office@jbcs.sbq.org.br |
_version_ |
1750318173093101568 |