Matrix effect in pesticide analysis by ultra fast liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-50532012000400011 |
Resumo: | In this work a study of several variables that affect the matrix effects (ME) was performed. The choice was given among four extraction solvents and four different clean-up methods which were compared in order to find the method that produces least ME and gives the highest response for 18 compounds. Variability of ME under identical chromatographic conditions for five fruits was also studied. Finally we evaluated different analyte/matrix ratios to assess the ME. The results showed that the significantly better responses (P < 0.05) were achieved by using the mixture of three absorbents and the use of only Graphitized Carbon Black causes greater suppression of ionization. From the five matrices tested it was found that grapes and tomatoes extract induced a larger ME, meanwhile the use of apple and mango matrices gave responses more like matrix-free standards. Finally, a negative correlation between the suppression of ionization and the compound/matrix ratio was found. |
id |
SBQ-2_e3bf4575aee68715c318fb6c363dc3f9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0103-50532012000400011 |
network_acronym_str |
SBQ-2 |
network_name_str |
Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Matrix effect in pesticide analysis by ultra fast liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometrypesticidesmass spectrometryliquid chromatographymatrix effectIn this work a study of several variables that affect the matrix effects (ME) was performed. The choice was given among four extraction solvents and four different clean-up methods which were compared in order to find the method that produces least ME and gives the highest response for 18 compounds. Variability of ME under identical chromatographic conditions for five fruits was also studied. Finally we evaluated different analyte/matrix ratios to assess the ME. The results showed that the significantly better responses (P < 0.05) were achieved by using the mixture of three absorbents and the use of only Graphitized Carbon Black causes greater suppression of ionization. From the five matrices tested it was found that grapes and tomatoes extract induced a larger ME, meanwhile the use of apple and mango matrices gave responses more like matrix-free standards. Finally, a negative correlation between the suppression of ionization and the compound/matrix ratio was found.Sociedade Brasileira de Química2012-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-50532012000400011Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society v.23 n.4 2012reponame:Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Química (SBQ)instacron:SBQ10.1590/S0103-50532012000400011info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAhumada,Diego A.Zamudio,Adriana M.España,Julio C.eng2012-04-27T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0103-50532012000400011Revistahttp://jbcs.sbq.org.brONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||office@jbcs.sbq.org.br1678-47900103-5053opendoar:2012-04-27T00:00Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Química (SBQ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Matrix effect in pesticide analysis by ultra fast liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry |
title |
Matrix effect in pesticide analysis by ultra fast liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry |
spellingShingle |
Matrix effect in pesticide analysis by ultra fast liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry Ahumada,Diego A. pesticides mass spectrometry liquid chromatography matrix effect |
title_short |
Matrix effect in pesticide analysis by ultra fast liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry |
title_full |
Matrix effect in pesticide analysis by ultra fast liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry |
title_fullStr |
Matrix effect in pesticide analysis by ultra fast liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry |
title_full_unstemmed |
Matrix effect in pesticide analysis by ultra fast liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry |
title_sort |
Matrix effect in pesticide analysis by ultra fast liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry |
author |
Ahumada,Diego A. |
author_facet |
Ahumada,Diego A. Zamudio,Adriana M. España,Julio C. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Zamudio,Adriana M. España,Julio C. |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ahumada,Diego A. Zamudio,Adriana M. España,Julio C. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
pesticides mass spectrometry liquid chromatography matrix effect |
topic |
pesticides mass spectrometry liquid chromatography matrix effect |
description |
In this work a study of several variables that affect the matrix effects (ME) was performed. The choice was given among four extraction solvents and four different clean-up methods which were compared in order to find the method that produces least ME and gives the highest response for 18 compounds. Variability of ME under identical chromatographic conditions for five fruits was also studied. Finally we evaluated different analyte/matrix ratios to assess the ME. The results showed that the significantly better responses (P < 0.05) were achieved by using the mixture of three absorbents and the use of only Graphitized Carbon Black causes greater suppression of ionization. From the five matrices tested it was found that grapes and tomatoes extract induced a larger ME, meanwhile the use of apple and mango matrices gave responses more like matrix-free standards. Finally, a negative correlation between the suppression of ionization and the compound/matrix ratio was found. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-04-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-50532012000400011 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-50532012000400011 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S0103-50532012000400011 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Química |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Química |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society v.23 n.4 2012 reponame:Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Química (SBQ) instacron:SBQ |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Química (SBQ) |
instacron_str |
SBQ |
institution |
SBQ |
reponame_str |
Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society (Online) |
collection |
Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Química (SBQ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||office@jbcs.sbq.org.br |
_version_ |
1750318173154967552 |