Matrix effect in pesticide analysis by ultra fast liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ahumada,Diego A.
Data de Publicação: 2012
Outros Autores: Zamudio,Adriana M., España,Julio C.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-50532012000400011
Resumo: In this work a study of several variables that affect the matrix effects (ME) was performed. The choice was given among four extraction solvents and four different clean-up methods which were compared in order to find the method that produces least ME and gives the highest response for 18 compounds. Variability of ME under identical chromatographic conditions for five fruits was also studied. Finally we evaluated different analyte/matrix ratios to assess the ME. The results showed that the significantly better responses (P < 0.05) were achieved by using the mixture of three absorbents and the use of only Graphitized Carbon Black causes greater suppression of ionization. From the five matrices tested it was found that grapes and tomatoes extract induced a larger ME, meanwhile the use of apple and mango matrices gave responses more like matrix-free standards. Finally, a negative correlation between the suppression of ionization and the compound/matrix ratio was found.
id SBQ-2_e3bf4575aee68715c318fb6c363dc3f9
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0103-50532012000400011
network_acronym_str SBQ-2
network_name_str Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Matrix effect in pesticide analysis by ultra fast liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometrypesticidesmass spectrometryliquid chromatographymatrix effectIn this work a study of several variables that affect the matrix effects (ME) was performed. The choice was given among four extraction solvents and four different clean-up methods which were compared in order to find the method that produces least ME and gives the highest response for 18 compounds. Variability of ME under identical chromatographic conditions for five fruits was also studied. Finally we evaluated different analyte/matrix ratios to assess the ME. The results showed that the significantly better responses (P < 0.05) were achieved by using the mixture of three absorbents and the use of only Graphitized Carbon Black causes greater suppression of ionization. From the five matrices tested it was found that grapes and tomatoes extract induced a larger ME, meanwhile the use of apple and mango matrices gave responses more like matrix-free standards. Finally, a negative correlation between the suppression of ionization and the compound/matrix ratio was found.Sociedade Brasileira de Química2012-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-50532012000400011Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society v.23 n.4 2012reponame:Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Química (SBQ)instacron:SBQ10.1590/S0103-50532012000400011info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAhumada,Diego A.Zamudio,Adriana M.España,Julio C.eng2012-04-27T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0103-50532012000400011Revistahttp://jbcs.sbq.org.brONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||office@jbcs.sbq.org.br1678-47900103-5053opendoar:2012-04-27T00:00Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Química (SBQ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Matrix effect in pesticide analysis by ultra fast liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry
title Matrix effect in pesticide analysis by ultra fast liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry
spellingShingle Matrix effect in pesticide analysis by ultra fast liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry
Ahumada,Diego A.
pesticides
mass spectrometry
liquid chromatography
matrix effect
title_short Matrix effect in pesticide analysis by ultra fast liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry
title_full Matrix effect in pesticide analysis by ultra fast liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry
title_fullStr Matrix effect in pesticide analysis by ultra fast liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry
title_full_unstemmed Matrix effect in pesticide analysis by ultra fast liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry
title_sort Matrix effect in pesticide analysis by ultra fast liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry
author Ahumada,Diego A.
author_facet Ahumada,Diego A.
Zamudio,Adriana M.
España,Julio C.
author_role author
author2 Zamudio,Adriana M.
España,Julio C.
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ahumada,Diego A.
Zamudio,Adriana M.
España,Julio C.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv pesticides
mass spectrometry
liquid chromatography
matrix effect
topic pesticides
mass spectrometry
liquid chromatography
matrix effect
description In this work a study of several variables that affect the matrix effects (ME) was performed. The choice was given among four extraction solvents and four different clean-up methods which were compared in order to find the method that produces least ME and gives the highest response for 18 compounds. Variability of ME under identical chromatographic conditions for five fruits was also studied. Finally we evaluated different analyte/matrix ratios to assess the ME. The results showed that the significantly better responses (P < 0.05) were achieved by using the mixture of three absorbents and the use of only Graphitized Carbon Black causes greater suppression of ionization. From the five matrices tested it was found that grapes and tomatoes extract induced a larger ME, meanwhile the use of apple and mango matrices gave responses more like matrix-free standards. Finally, a negative correlation between the suppression of ionization and the compound/matrix ratio was found.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-50532012000400011
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-50532012000400011
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0103-50532012000400011
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Química
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Química
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society v.23 n.4 2012
reponame:Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Química (SBQ)
instacron:SBQ
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Química (SBQ)
instacron_str SBQ
institution SBQ
reponame_str Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society (Online)
collection Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Química (SBQ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||office@jbcs.sbq.org.br
_version_ 1750318173154967552