EpiFibro (Brazilian Fibromyalgia Registry): data on the ACR classification and diagnostic preliminary criteria fulfillment and the follow-up evaluation

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Martinez,José Eduardo
Publication Date: 2017
Other Authors: Paiva,Eduardo S., Rezende,Marcelo C., Heymann,Roberto E., Helfenstein Jr.,Milton, Ranzolin,Aline, Provenza,Jose Roberto, Ribeiro,Luiz Severiano, Souza,Eduardo J.R., Feldman,Daniel P., Assis,Marcos Renato de
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia (Online)
Download full: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0482-50042017000200129
Summary: Abstract Introduction: EpiFibro (Brazilian Epidemiological Study of Fibromyalgia) was created to study Fibromyalgia patients. Patients were included since 2011 according to the 1990 American College of Rheumatology Classification Criteria for Fibromyalgia (ACR1990). Objectives: To determine how many patients still fulfill the ACR1990 and the ACR2010 criteria in 2014; to determine the correlation between the impact of FM and to describe data on the follow-up evaluation. Methods: This is a cross sectional study in a multicenter cohort of patients. The data was collected between 2013 and 2015. Physician included patients that fulfilled the ACR1990 criteria on the date of entry. The follow-up data were considered only for patients with at least two evaluations. A minimally significant change was considered to be a 30% variation of parameters scores. Results: 810 patients’ data were analyzed. Patients presented a mean age of 51.8 ± 11.5 years old. There were 786 female. Most patients met both criteria. There was a greater fulfilling of the ACR2010. There was a moderate correlation between Polysymptomatic Distress Scale and Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire. Three hundred fourteen patients with more than one assessment were found, but 88 patients were excluded. Thus, 226 patients with one follow-up monitoring parameter were considered (Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire: 222; Polysymptomatic Distress Scale: 199; both: 195). The mean follow-up time was 9.1 ± 7.5 months (1–44). Most patients became stable. Conclusion: InEpiFibro, most patients fulfill simultaneously the ACR1990 and ACR2010. A larger number of patients fulfill the ACR2010 at the time of the evaluation. There was a moderate correlation between the Polysymptomatic Distress Scale and the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire. Most patients remained stable over time.
id SBR-1_823f8ce84ad9a7984b7b7f7ae9870d30
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0482-50042017000200129
network_acronym_str SBR-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling EpiFibro (Brazilian Fibromyalgia Registry): data on the ACR classification and diagnostic preliminary criteria fulfillment and the follow-up evaluationFibromyalgiaClassification criteriaDiagnostic criteriaFollow-upAbstract Introduction: EpiFibro (Brazilian Epidemiological Study of Fibromyalgia) was created to study Fibromyalgia patients. Patients were included since 2011 according to the 1990 American College of Rheumatology Classification Criteria for Fibromyalgia (ACR1990). Objectives: To determine how many patients still fulfill the ACR1990 and the ACR2010 criteria in 2014; to determine the correlation between the impact of FM and to describe data on the follow-up evaluation. Methods: This is a cross sectional study in a multicenter cohort of patients. The data was collected between 2013 and 2015. Physician included patients that fulfilled the ACR1990 criteria on the date of entry. The follow-up data were considered only for patients with at least two evaluations. A minimally significant change was considered to be a 30% variation of parameters scores. Results: 810 patients’ data were analyzed. Patients presented a mean age of 51.8 ± 11.5 years old. There were 786 female. Most patients met both criteria. There was a greater fulfilling of the ACR2010. There was a moderate correlation between Polysymptomatic Distress Scale and Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire. Three hundred fourteen patients with more than one assessment were found, but 88 patients were excluded. Thus, 226 patients with one follow-up monitoring parameter were considered (Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire: 222; Polysymptomatic Distress Scale: 199; both: 195). The mean follow-up time was 9.1 ± 7.5 months (1–44). Most patients became stable. Conclusion: InEpiFibro, most patients fulfill simultaneously the ACR1990 and ACR2010. A larger number of patients fulfill the ACR2010 at the time of the evaluation. There was a moderate correlation between the Polysymptomatic Distress Scale and the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire. Most patients remained stable over time.Sociedade Brasileira de Reumatologia2017-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0482-50042017000200129Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia v.57 n.2 2017reponame:Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Reumatologia (SBR)instacron:SBR10.1016/j.rbre.2016.09.012info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMartinez,José EduardoPaiva,Eduardo S.Rezende,Marcelo C.Heymann,Roberto E.Helfenstein Jr.,MiltonRanzolin,AlineProvenza,Jose RobertoRibeiro,Luiz SeverianoSouza,Eduardo J.R.Feldman,Daniel P.Assis,Marcos Renato deeng2017-11-21T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0482-50042017000200129Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=0482-5004&lng=pt&nrm=isoONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||sbre@terra.com.br1809-45700482-5004opendoar:2017-11-21T00:00Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Reumatologia (SBR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv EpiFibro (Brazilian Fibromyalgia Registry): data on the ACR classification and diagnostic preliminary criteria fulfillment and the follow-up evaluation
title EpiFibro (Brazilian Fibromyalgia Registry): data on the ACR classification and diagnostic preliminary criteria fulfillment and the follow-up evaluation
spellingShingle EpiFibro (Brazilian Fibromyalgia Registry): data on the ACR classification and diagnostic preliminary criteria fulfillment and the follow-up evaluation
Martinez,José Eduardo
Fibromyalgia
Classification criteria
Diagnostic criteria
Follow-up
title_short EpiFibro (Brazilian Fibromyalgia Registry): data on the ACR classification and diagnostic preliminary criteria fulfillment and the follow-up evaluation
title_full EpiFibro (Brazilian Fibromyalgia Registry): data on the ACR classification and diagnostic preliminary criteria fulfillment and the follow-up evaluation
title_fullStr EpiFibro (Brazilian Fibromyalgia Registry): data on the ACR classification and diagnostic preliminary criteria fulfillment and the follow-up evaluation
title_full_unstemmed EpiFibro (Brazilian Fibromyalgia Registry): data on the ACR classification and diagnostic preliminary criteria fulfillment and the follow-up evaluation
title_sort EpiFibro (Brazilian Fibromyalgia Registry): data on the ACR classification and diagnostic preliminary criteria fulfillment and the follow-up evaluation
author Martinez,José Eduardo
author_facet Martinez,José Eduardo
Paiva,Eduardo S.
Rezende,Marcelo C.
Heymann,Roberto E.
Helfenstein Jr.,Milton
Ranzolin,Aline
Provenza,Jose Roberto
Ribeiro,Luiz Severiano
Souza,Eduardo J.R.
Feldman,Daniel P.
Assis,Marcos Renato de
author_role author
author2 Paiva,Eduardo S.
Rezende,Marcelo C.
Heymann,Roberto E.
Helfenstein Jr.,Milton
Ranzolin,Aline
Provenza,Jose Roberto
Ribeiro,Luiz Severiano
Souza,Eduardo J.R.
Feldman,Daniel P.
Assis,Marcos Renato de
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Martinez,José Eduardo
Paiva,Eduardo S.
Rezende,Marcelo C.
Heymann,Roberto E.
Helfenstein Jr.,Milton
Ranzolin,Aline
Provenza,Jose Roberto
Ribeiro,Luiz Severiano
Souza,Eduardo J.R.
Feldman,Daniel P.
Assis,Marcos Renato de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Fibromyalgia
Classification criteria
Diagnostic criteria
Follow-up
topic Fibromyalgia
Classification criteria
Diagnostic criteria
Follow-up
description Abstract Introduction: EpiFibro (Brazilian Epidemiological Study of Fibromyalgia) was created to study Fibromyalgia patients. Patients were included since 2011 according to the 1990 American College of Rheumatology Classification Criteria for Fibromyalgia (ACR1990). Objectives: To determine how many patients still fulfill the ACR1990 and the ACR2010 criteria in 2014; to determine the correlation between the impact of FM and to describe data on the follow-up evaluation. Methods: This is a cross sectional study in a multicenter cohort of patients. The data was collected between 2013 and 2015. Physician included patients that fulfilled the ACR1990 criteria on the date of entry. The follow-up data were considered only for patients with at least two evaluations. A minimally significant change was considered to be a 30% variation of parameters scores. Results: 810 patients’ data were analyzed. Patients presented a mean age of 51.8 ± 11.5 years old. There were 786 female. Most patients met both criteria. There was a greater fulfilling of the ACR2010. There was a moderate correlation between Polysymptomatic Distress Scale and Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire. Three hundred fourteen patients with more than one assessment were found, but 88 patients were excluded. Thus, 226 patients with one follow-up monitoring parameter were considered (Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire: 222; Polysymptomatic Distress Scale: 199; both: 195). The mean follow-up time was 9.1 ± 7.5 months (1–44). Most patients became stable. Conclusion: InEpiFibro, most patients fulfill simultaneously the ACR1990 and ACR2010. A larger number of patients fulfill the ACR2010 at the time of the evaluation. There was a moderate correlation between the Polysymptomatic Distress Scale and the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire. Most patients remained stable over time.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0482-50042017000200129
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0482-50042017000200129
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1016/j.rbre.2016.09.012
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Reumatologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Reumatologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia v.57 n.2 2017
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Reumatologia (SBR)
instacron:SBR
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Reumatologia (SBR)
instacron_str SBR
institution SBR
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Reumatologia (SBR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||sbre@terra.com.br
_version_ 1750318051521200128