Simplified upper pole nephrectomy: initial experience
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2005 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | International Braz J Urol (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382005000200013 |
Resumo: | OBJECTIVE: To assess the results of an upper pole nephrectomy technique on 5 children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Upper pole nephrectomy was performed on 5 children, including 4 females and 1 male. Age ranged from 3 to 6 years old. The technique was performed without initial dissection of the renal pedicle. The upper pole is incised and removed. Upon its complete dissection, the segment that drains the upper pole is easily identified, clamped and sectioned. RESULTS: Three children with ureterocele and 2 with ectopic ureter underwent this procedure. There was no intra- or postoperative complication with this technique. DSMA scintigraphy showed no decrease in renal function in the remaining kidney following the procedure. CONCLUSION: The polar nephrectomy technique is simple, and has the advantage of not approaching the renal hilum, which makes surgery less laborious and prevents risk of renal damage, hemorrhage and decreased function in the remaining renal portion. |
id |
SBU-1_0259ace2eca01faa568d96b8b73ba727 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1677-55382005000200013 |
network_acronym_str |
SBU-1 |
network_name_str |
International Braz J Urol (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Simplified upper pole nephrectomy: initial experiencekidneyureterchildrenabnormalitiesectopicureteroceleOBJECTIVE: To assess the results of an upper pole nephrectomy technique on 5 children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Upper pole nephrectomy was performed on 5 children, including 4 females and 1 male. Age ranged from 3 to 6 years old. The technique was performed without initial dissection of the renal pedicle. The upper pole is incised and removed. Upon its complete dissection, the segment that drains the upper pole is easily identified, clamped and sectioned. RESULTS: Three children with ureterocele and 2 with ectopic ureter underwent this procedure. There was no intra- or postoperative complication with this technique. DSMA scintigraphy showed no decrease in renal function in the remaining kidney following the procedure. CONCLUSION: The polar nephrectomy technique is simple, and has the advantage of not approaching the renal hilum, which makes surgery less laborious and prevents risk of renal damage, hemorrhage and decreased function in the remaining renal portion.Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia2005-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382005000200013International braz j urol v.31 n.2 2005reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)instacron:SBU10.1590/S1677-55382005000200013info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBarroso Jr,UbirajaraVinhaes,Antonio J.Barros,Milton S.Calado,Adriano A.Macedo Jr,AntonioSrougi,Migueleng2005-06-21T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1677-55382005000200013Revistahttp://www.brazjurol.com.br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br1677-61191677-5538opendoar:2005-06-21T00:00International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Simplified upper pole nephrectomy: initial experience |
title |
Simplified upper pole nephrectomy: initial experience |
spellingShingle |
Simplified upper pole nephrectomy: initial experience Barroso Jr,Ubirajara kidney ureter children abnormalities ectopic ureterocele |
title_short |
Simplified upper pole nephrectomy: initial experience |
title_full |
Simplified upper pole nephrectomy: initial experience |
title_fullStr |
Simplified upper pole nephrectomy: initial experience |
title_full_unstemmed |
Simplified upper pole nephrectomy: initial experience |
title_sort |
Simplified upper pole nephrectomy: initial experience |
author |
Barroso Jr,Ubirajara |
author_facet |
Barroso Jr,Ubirajara Vinhaes,Antonio J. Barros,Milton S. Calado,Adriano A. Macedo Jr,Antonio Srougi,Miguel |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Vinhaes,Antonio J. Barros,Milton S. Calado,Adriano A. Macedo Jr,Antonio Srougi,Miguel |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Barroso Jr,Ubirajara Vinhaes,Antonio J. Barros,Milton S. Calado,Adriano A. Macedo Jr,Antonio Srougi,Miguel |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
kidney ureter children abnormalities ectopic ureterocele |
topic |
kidney ureter children abnormalities ectopic ureterocele |
description |
OBJECTIVE: To assess the results of an upper pole nephrectomy technique on 5 children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Upper pole nephrectomy was performed on 5 children, including 4 females and 1 male. Age ranged from 3 to 6 years old. The technique was performed without initial dissection of the renal pedicle. The upper pole is incised and removed. Upon its complete dissection, the segment that drains the upper pole is easily identified, clamped and sectioned. RESULTS: Three children with ureterocele and 2 with ectopic ureter underwent this procedure. There was no intra- or postoperative complication with this technique. DSMA scintigraphy showed no decrease in renal function in the remaining kidney following the procedure. CONCLUSION: The polar nephrectomy technique is simple, and has the advantage of not approaching the renal hilum, which makes surgery less laborious and prevents risk of renal damage, hemorrhage and decreased function in the remaining renal portion. |
publishDate |
2005 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2005-04-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382005000200013 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382005000200013 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S1677-55382005000200013 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
International braz j urol v.31 n.2 2005 reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU) instacron:SBU |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU) |
instacron_str |
SBU |
institution |
SBU |
reponame_str |
International Braz J Urol (Online) |
collection |
International Braz J Urol (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br |
_version_ |
1750318069380546560 |