Does sildenafil enhance the effect of tamsulosin in relieving acute urinary retention?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Sharifi,Seyed Hossein Hosseini
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Mokarrar,Mohsen Heidari, Khaledi,Flora, Yamini-Sharif,Reyhaneh, Lashay,Alireza, Soltani,Mohammad Hossein
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: International Braz J Urol (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382014000300373
Resumo: Objective To compare the safety and efficacy of combined therapy using sildenafil and tamsulosin for management of acute urinary retention (AUR) with tamsulosin alone in patients with benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH). Materials and Methods 101 patients were enrolled in a randomized placebo-controlled study from June 2009 to April 2012. Patients presenting with an initial episode of spontaneous AUR underwent urethral catheterization and then prospectively randomized to receive tamsulosin 0.4mg plus sildenafil 50mg in group A and tamsulosin 0.4mg plus placebo in group B for three days. Urethral catheter was removed three days after medical treatment and patient’s ability to void assessed at the day after catheter removal and seven days later. Patients who voided successfully were followed at least for three months. Results Mean age of patients was 59.64 ± 3.84 years in group A and 60.56 ± 4.12 years in group B (p value = 0.92). Mean prostate volume and mean residual urine were comparable between both groups (p value = 0.74 and 0.42, respectively). Fifteen patients in group A (success rate: 70%) and nineteen patients in group B (success rate: 62.7%) had failed trial without catheter (TWOC) at 7th day following AUR (p value = 0.3). No significant difference was noted between both groups regarding the rate of repeated AUR at one month and three month follow-up period (p = 0.07 and p = 0.45, respectively). Conclusion It seems that combination therapy by using 5-phosphodiesterase inhibitor and tamsulosin has no significant advantages to improve urinary retention versus tamsulosin alone.
id SBU-1_1e62d53c846849967a88c4e9cf3d5fc5
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1677-55382014000300373
network_acronym_str SBU-1
network_name_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Does sildenafil enhance the effect of tamsulosin in relieving acute urinary retention?urinastatin [Supplementary Concept]Lower Urinary Tract SymptomsProstatic HyperplasiaUrinary Bladder Objective To compare the safety and efficacy of combined therapy using sildenafil and tamsulosin for management of acute urinary retention (AUR) with tamsulosin alone in patients with benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH). Materials and Methods 101 patients were enrolled in a randomized placebo-controlled study from June 2009 to April 2012. Patients presenting with an initial episode of spontaneous AUR underwent urethral catheterization and then prospectively randomized to receive tamsulosin 0.4mg plus sildenafil 50mg in group A and tamsulosin 0.4mg plus placebo in group B for three days. Urethral catheter was removed three days after medical treatment and patient’s ability to void assessed at the day after catheter removal and seven days later. Patients who voided successfully were followed at least for three months. Results Mean age of patients was 59.64 ± 3.84 years in group A and 60.56 ± 4.12 years in group B (p value = 0.92). Mean prostate volume and mean residual urine were comparable between both groups (p value = 0.74 and 0.42, respectively). Fifteen patients in group A (success rate: 70%) and nineteen patients in group B (success rate: 62.7%) had failed trial without catheter (TWOC) at 7th day following AUR (p value = 0.3). No significant difference was noted between both groups regarding the rate of repeated AUR at one month and three month follow-up period (p = 0.07 and p = 0.45, respectively). Conclusion It seems that combination therapy by using 5-phosphodiesterase inhibitor and tamsulosin has no significant advantages to improve urinary retention versus tamsulosin alone. Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia2014-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382014000300373International braz j urol v.40 n.3 2014reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)instacron:SBU10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.03.11info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSharifi,Seyed Hossein HosseiniMokarrar,Mohsen HeidariKhaledi,FloraYamini-Sharif,ReyhanehLashay,AlirezaSoltani,Mohammad Hosseineng2014-08-12T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1677-55382014000300373Revistahttp://www.brazjurol.com.br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br1677-61191677-5538opendoar:2014-08-12T00:00International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Does sildenafil enhance the effect of tamsulosin in relieving acute urinary retention?
title Does sildenafil enhance the effect of tamsulosin in relieving acute urinary retention?
spellingShingle Does sildenafil enhance the effect of tamsulosin in relieving acute urinary retention?
Sharifi,Seyed Hossein Hosseini
urinastatin [Supplementary Concept]
Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
Prostatic Hyperplasia
Urinary Bladder
title_short Does sildenafil enhance the effect of tamsulosin in relieving acute urinary retention?
title_full Does sildenafil enhance the effect of tamsulosin in relieving acute urinary retention?
title_fullStr Does sildenafil enhance the effect of tamsulosin in relieving acute urinary retention?
title_full_unstemmed Does sildenafil enhance the effect of tamsulosin in relieving acute urinary retention?
title_sort Does sildenafil enhance the effect of tamsulosin in relieving acute urinary retention?
author Sharifi,Seyed Hossein Hosseini
author_facet Sharifi,Seyed Hossein Hosseini
Mokarrar,Mohsen Heidari
Khaledi,Flora
Yamini-Sharif,Reyhaneh
Lashay,Alireza
Soltani,Mohammad Hossein
author_role author
author2 Mokarrar,Mohsen Heidari
Khaledi,Flora
Yamini-Sharif,Reyhaneh
Lashay,Alireza
Soltani,Mohammad Hossein
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sharifi,Seyed Hossein Hosseini
Mokarrar,Mohsen Heidari
Khaledi,Flora
Yamini-Sharif,Reyhaneh
Lashay,Alireza
Soltani,Mohammad Hossein
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv urinastatin [Supplementary Concept]
Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
Prostatic Hyperplasia
Urinary Bladder
topic urinastatin [Supplementary Concept]
Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
Prostatic Hyperplasia
Urinary Bladder
description Objective To compare the safety and efficacy of combined therapy using sildenafil and tamsulosin for management of acute urinary retention (AUR) with tamsulosin alone in patients with benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH). Materials and Methods 101 patients were enrolled in a randomized placebo-controlled study from June 2009 to April 2012. Patients presenting with an initial episode of spontaneous AUR underwent urethral catheterization and then prospectively randomized to receive tamsulosin 0.4mg plus sildenafil 50mg in group A and tamsulosin 0.4mg plus placebo in group B for three days. Urethral catheter was removed three days after medical treatment and patient’s ability to void assessed at the day after catheter removal and seven days later. Patients who voided successfully were followed at least for three months. Results Mean age of patients was 59.64 ± 3.84 years in group A and 60.56 ± 4.12 years in group B (p value = 0.92). Mean prostate volume and mean residual urine were comparable between both groups (p value = 0.74 and 0.42, respectively). Fifteen patients in group A (success rate: 70%) and nineteen patients in group B (success rate: 62.7%) had failed trial without catheter (TWOC) at 7th day following AUR (p value = 0.3). No significant difference was noted between both groups regarding the rate of repeated AUR at one month and three month follow-up period (p = 0.07 and p = 0.45, respectively). Conclusion It seems that combination therapy by using 5-phosphodiesterase inhibitor and tamsulosin has no significant advantages to improve urinary retention versus tamsulosin alone.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382014000300373
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382014000300373
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.03.11
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv International braz j urol v.40 n.3 2014
reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron:SBU
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron_str SBU
institution SBU
reponame_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
collection International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br
_version_ 1750318073668173824