Oncological and functional outcomes of open versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in T1b tumors: A single-center analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Kartal,Ibrahim
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Karakoyunlu,Nihat, Çakici,Çağlar, Karabacak,Osman, Sağnak,Levent, Ersoy,Hamit
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: International Braz J Urol (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382020000300341
Resumo: ABSTRACT Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the oncological and functional results of open partial nephrectomy (OPN) and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) at the T1b clinical stage, which constitutes 25% of renal cell carcinomas (RCC) at diagnosis. Materials and Methods: The characteristics of 63 patients with stage T1b solitary tumor who underwent OPN (41) or LPN (22) were compared. The survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to determine the factors affecting disease-free survival. Potential predictive factors, which might affect the postoperative glomerular filtration rate (GFR), were evaluated using multivariate linear regression analysis. Results: No differences were observed between OPN and LPN groups regarding patient and tumor characteristics. Although the warm ischemia time, intraoperative estimated blood loss, and operation duration were higher in the LPN group, no differences were noted between the two techniques regarding complication rates (p<0.001, p=0.023, p≤0.001, and p=0.190, respectively). The median hospitalization time was shorter in the LPN group than that in the OPN group (4 and 5 days, respectively), with less severe complications. No intergroup differences were observed regarding cancer-specific survival (CSS), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). The evaluation of the factors affecting DFS showed that age was an effective parameter (RR = 1.112, 95% CI: 1.010–8.254), but the surgical technique was not. Conclusion: No differences were observed between OPN and LPN techniques between oncological and functional outcomes in patients with clinical stage T1b RCC.
id SBU-1_2144cf5dbf1adb06f6bee860e0ae90af
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1677-55382020000300341
network_acronym_str SBU-1
network_name_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Oncological and functional outcomes of open versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in T1b tumors: A single-center analysisCarcinomaRenal CellWarm IschemiaDisease-Free SurvivalABSTRACT Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the oncological and functional results of open partial nephrectomy (OPN) and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) at the T1b clinical stage, which constitutes 25% of renal cell carcinomas (RCC) at diagnosis. Materials and Methods: The characteristics of 63 patients with stage T1b solitary tumor who underwent OPN (41) or LPN (22) were compared. The survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to determine the factors affecting disease-free survival. Potential predictive factors, which might affect the postoperative glomerular filtration rate (GFR), were evaluated using multivariate linear regression analysis. Results: No differences were observed between OPN and LPN groups regarding patient and tumor characteristics. Although the warm ischemia time, intraoperative estimated blood loss, and operation duration were higher in the LPN group, no differences were noted between the two techniques regarding complication rates (p<0.001, p=0.023, p≤0.001, and p=0.190, respectively). The median hospitalization time was shorter in the LPN group than that in the OPN group (4 and 5 days, respectively), with less severe complications. No intergroup differences were observed regarding cancer-specific survival (CSS), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). The evaluation of the factors affecting DFS showed that age was an effective parameter (RR = 1.112, 95% CI: 1.010–8.254), but the surgical technique was not. Conclusion: No differences were observed between OPN and LPN techniques between oncological and functional outcomes in patients with clinical stage T1b RCC.Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia2020-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382020000300341International braz j urol v.46 n.3 2020reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)instacron:SBU10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2018.0865info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKartal,IbrahimKarakoyunlu,NihatÇakici,ÇağlarKarabacak,OsmanSağnak,LeventErsoy,Hamiteng2020-03-25T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1677-55382020000300341Revistahttp://www.brazjurol.com.br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br1677-61191677-5538opendoar:2020-03-25T00:00International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Oncological and functional outcomes of open versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in T1b tumors: A single-center analysis
title Oncological and functional outcomes of open versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in T1b tumors: A single-center analysis
spellingShingle Oncological and functional outcomes of open versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in T1b tumors: A single-center analysis
Kartal,Ibrahim
Carcinoma
Renal Cell
Warm Ischemia
Disease-Free Survival
title_short Oncological and functional outcomes of open versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in T1b tumors: A single-center analysis
title_full Oncological and functional outcomes of open versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in T1b tumors: A single-center analysis
title_fullStr Oncological and functional outcomes of open versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in T1b tumors: A single-center analysis
title_full_unstemmed Oncological and functional outcomes of open versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in T1b tumors: A single-center analysis
title_sort Oncological and functional outcomes of open versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in T1b tumors: A single-center analysis
author Kartal,Ibrahim
author_facet Kartal,Ibrahim
Karakoyunlu,Nihat
Çakici,Çağlar
Karabacak,Osman
Sağnak,Levent
Ersoy,Hamit
author_role author
author2 Karakoyunlu,Nihat
Çakici,Çağlar
Karabacak,Osman
Sağnak,Levent
Ersoy,Hamit
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Kartal,Ibrahim
Karakoyunlu,Nihat
Çakici,Çağlar
Karabacak,Osman
Sağnak,Levent
Ersoy,Hamit
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Carcinoma
Renal Cell
Warm Ischemia
Disease-Free Survival
topic Carcinoma
Renal Cell
Warm Ischemia
Disease-Free Survival
description ABSTRACT Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the oncological and functional results of open partial nephrectomy (OPN) and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) at the T1b clinical stage, which constitutes 25% of renal cell carcinomas (RCC) at diagnosis. Materials and Methods: The characteristics of 63 patients with stage T1b solitary tumor who underwent OPN (41) or LPN (22) were compared. The survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to determine the factors affecting disease-free survival. Potential predictive factors, which might affect the postoperative glomerular filtration rate (GFR), were evaluated using multivariate linear regression analysis. Results: No differences were observed between OPN and LPN groups regarding patient and tumor characteristics. Although the warm ischemia time, intraoperative estimated blood loss, and operation duration were higher in the LPN group, no differences were noted between the two techniques regarding complication rates (p<0.001, p=0.023, p≤0.001, and p=0.190, respectively). The median hospitalization time was shorter in the LPN group than that in the OPN group (4 and 5 days, respectively), with less severe complications. No intergroup differences were observed regarding cancer-specific survival (CSS), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). The evaluation of the factors affecting DFS showed that age was an effective parameter (RR = 1.112, 95% CI: 1.010–8.254), but the surgical technique was not. Conclusion: No differences were observed between OPN and LPN techniques between oncological and functional outcomes in patients with clinical stage T1b RCC.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382020000300341
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382020000300341
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2018.0865
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv International braz j urol v.46 n.3 2020
reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron:SBU
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron_str SBU
institution SBU
reponame_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
collection International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br
_version_ 1750318077289955328