Endourologic strategies for a minimally invasive management of urinary tract stones in patients with urinary diversion

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Zhong,FangLing
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Alberto,Gurioli, Chen,GuangMing, Zhu,Wei, Tang,FuCai, Zeng,Guohua, Lei,Ming
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: International Braz J Urol (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382018000100075
Resumo: ABSTRACT Objective To present our experience in minimally invasive management of urinary tract stones in patients with urinary diversion. Materials and Methods We retrospectively reviewed 26 patients with urinary tract stones after cystectomy and urinary diversion. The types of urinary diversion were ileal conduit, colon conduit, ileal orthotopic neobladder in 19, 4, and 3 patients, respectively. At postoperative days 2, a plain KUB and urinary ultrasonography were performed in order to assess stone fragmentation or hydronephrosis. According to postoperative imaging, stone free rate (SFR) was defined as complete absence of fragments or residual stones less than 4mm. Results 19 patients were treated with minimally invasive percutaneous lithotripsy (MPCNL) and 2 patients required second-look MPCNL. Anterograde flexible ureteroscopy was performed in 2 patients, while in 2 patients a combined anterograde and retrograde approach was required. Three reservoir stones were treated by transurethral neo-bladder lithotripsy. Postoperative significant complications occurred in 2 patients (7.7%). The highest percentage of stone composition was struvite, as a result of chronic urinary tract infection (UTI). SFR was 88.5% (23 of 26). Conclusions Our experience showed that MPCNL is a safe and effective treatment modality with little morbidity for renal and upper ureteral stones in patients with urinary diversion. For middle and lower ureteral stones, an anterograde approach could be also considered as a first line treatment, but a combined anterograde and retrograde approach was required when the anterograde access alone cannot provide acceptable results.
id SBU-1_23fe3a81c9465b9efcf02c9c69b78e2c
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1677-55382018000100075
network_acronym_str SBU-1
network_name_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Endourologic strategies for a minimally invasive management of urinary tract stones in patients with urinary diversionUrinary CalculiUrinary DiversionCystectomyABSTRACT Objective To present our experience in minimally invasive management of urinary tract stones in patients with urinary diversion. Materials and Methods We retrospectively reviewed 26 patients with urinary tract stones after cystectomy and urinary diversion. The types of urinary diversion were ileal conduit, colon conduit, ileal orthotopic neobladder in 19, 4, and 3 patients, respectively. At postoperative days 2, a plain KUB and urinary ultrasonography were performed in order to assess stone fragmentation or hydronephrosis. According to postoperative imaging, stone free rate (SFR) was defined as complete absence of fragments or residual stones less than 4mm. Results 19 patients were treated with minimally invasive percutaneous lithotripsy (MPCNL) and 2 patients required second-look MPCNL. Anterograde flexible ureteroscopy was performed in 2 patients, while in 2 patients a combined anterograde and retrograde approach was required. Three reservoir stones were treated by transurethral neo-bladder lithotripsy. Postoperative significant complications occurred in 2 patients (7.7%). The highest percentage of stone composition was struvite, as a result of chronic urinary tract infection (UTI). SFR was 88.5% (23 of 26). Conclusions Our experience showed that MPCNL is a safe and effective treatment modality with little morbidity for renal and upper ureteral stones in patients with urinary diversion. For middle and lower ureteral stones, an anterograde approach could be also considered as a first line treatment, but a combined anterograde and retrograde approach was required when the anterograde access alone cannot provide acceptable results.Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia2018-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382018000100075International braz j urol v.44 n.1 2018reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)instacron:SBU10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2017.0431info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessZhong,FangLingAlberto,GurioliChen,GuangMingZhu,WeiTang,FuCaiZeng,GuohuaLei,Mingeng2018-02-23T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1677-55382018000100075Revistahttp://www.brazjurol.com.br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br1677-61191677-5538opendoar:2018-02-23T00:00International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Endourologic strategies for a minimally invasive management of urinary tract stones in patients with urinary diversion
title Endourologic strategies for a minimally invasive management of urinary tract stones in patients with urinary diversion
spellingShingle Endourologic strategies for a minimally invasive management of urinary tract stones in patients with urinary diversion
Zhong,FangLing
Urinary Calculi
Urinary Diversion
Cystectomy
title_short Endourologic strategies for a minimally invasive management of urinary tract stones in patients with urinary diversion
title_full Endourologic strategies for a minimally invasive management of urinary tract stones in patients with urinary diversion
title_fullStr Endourologic strategies for a minimally invasive management of urinary tract stones in patients with urinary diversion
title_full_unstemmed Endourologic strategies for a minimally invasive management of urinary tract stones in patients with urinary diversion
title_sort Endourologic strategies for a minimally invasive management of urinary tract stones in patients with urinary diversion
author Zhong,FangLing
author_facet Zhong,FangLing
Alberto,Gurioli
Chen,GuangMing
Zhu,Wei
Tang,FuCai
Zeng,Guohua
Lei,Ming
author_role author
author2 Alberto,Gurioli
Chen,GuangMing
Zhu,Wei
Tang,FuCai
Zeng,Guohua
Lei,Ming
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Zhong,FangLing
Alberto,Gurioli
Chen,GuangMing
Zhu,Wei
Tang,FuCai
Zeng,Guohua
Lei,Ming
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Urinary Calculi
Urinary Diversion
Cystectomy
topic Urinary Calculi
Urinary Diversion
Cystectomy
description ABSTRACT Objective To present our experience in minimally invasive management of urinary tract stones in patients with urinary diversion. Materials and Methods We retrospectively reviewed 26 patients with urinary tract stones after cystectomy and urinary diversion. The types of urinary diversion were ileal conduit, colon conduit, ileal orthotopic neobladder in 19, 4, and 3 patients, respectively. At postoperative days 2, a plain KUB and urinary ultrasonography were performed in order to assess stone fragmentation or hydronephrosis. According to postoperative imaging, stone free rate (SFR) was defined as complete absence of fragments or residual stones less than 4mm. Results 19 patients were treated with minimally invasive percutaneous lithotripsy (MPCNL) and 2 patients required second-look MPCNL. Anterograde flexible ureteroscopy was performed in 2 patients, while in 2 patients a combined anterograde and retrograde approach was required. Three reservoir stones were treated by transurethral neo-bladder lithotripsy. Postoperative significant complications occurred in 2 patients (7.7%). The highest percentage of stone composition was struvite, as a result of chronic urinary tract infection (UTI). SFR was 88.5% (23 of 26). Conclusions Our experience showed that MPCNL is a safe and effective treatment modality with little morbidity for renal and upper ureteral stones in patients with urinary diversion. For middle and lower ureteral stones, an anterograde approach could be also considered as a first line treatment, but a combined anterograde and retrograde approach was required when the anterograde access alone cannot provide acceptable results.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-02-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382018000100075
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382018000100075
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2017.0431
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv International braz j urol v.44 n.1 2018
reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron:SBU
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron_str SBU
institution SBU
reponame_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
collection International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br
_version_ 1750318075883814912