Incidence of retrorenal colon during percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Balasar,Mehmet
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Kandemir,Abdülkadir, Poyraz,Necdet, Unal,Yunus, Ozturk,Ahmet
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: International Braz J Urol (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382015000200274
Resumo: Objective The aim of this study was to investigate retrorenal colon incidence in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) interventions made in our clinic. Materials and Methods Clinical data of 804 PNL patients, accumulated over a 7 year period (2006-2012), was surveyed. The patient files were reviewed retrospectively, and only those who had abdominal computed tomography (CT) images before PNL intervention were included in the study. In the CT images, the position of both the ascending and descending colon in relation to the right and left kidneys were evaluated. Results According to our hospital reports, 394 patients with CT images were included in the present study 27 patients (6.9%) had retrorenal colon, of which 18 (4.6%) were on the left side, 4 (1.0%) on the right side and 5 (1.3%) had bilateral retrorenal colons. Colonic perforation complication was seen only in two patients and the colonic perforation rate was 0.3%. These two cases had no CT images. Conclusions PNL, in the process of becoming the standard treatment modality, is a safe and reliable technique for renal stone treatment. Colonic injury should be taken into consideration during PNL interventions of the lower pole of the kidney (especially on the left side) due to the location of retrorenal colon.
id SBU-1_240a5ed6beb57b84ba2291699f2731af
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1677-55382015000200274
network_acronym_str SBU-1
network_name_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Incidence of retrorenal colon during percutaneous nephrolithotomyColonTomography, X-Ray ComputedNephrostomy, Percutaneous Objective The aim of this study was to investigate retrorenal colon incidence in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) interventions made in our clinic. Materials and Methods Clinical data of 804 PNL patients, accumulated over a 7 year period (2006-2012), was surveyed. The patient files were reviewed retrospectively, and only those who had abdominal computed tomography (CT) images before PNL intervention were included in the study. In the CT images, the position of both the ascending and descending colon in relation to the right and left kidneys were evaluated. Results According to our hospital reports, 394 patients with CT images were included in the present study 27 patients (6.9%) had retrorenal colon, of which 18 (4.6%) were on the left side, 4 (1.0%) on the right side and 5 (1.3%) had bilateral retrorenal colons. Colonic perforation complication was seen only in two patients and the colonic perforation rate was 0.3%. These two cases had no CT images. Conclusions PNL, in the process of becoming the standard treatment modality, is a safe and reliable technique for renal stone treatment. Colonic injury should be taken into consideration during PNL interventions of the lower pole of the kidney (especially on the left side) due to the location of retrorenal colon. Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia2015-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382015000200274International braz j urol v.41 n.2 2015reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)instacron:SBU10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.02.13info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBalasar,MehmetKandemir,AbdülkadirPoyraz,NecdetUnal,YunusOzturk,Ahmeteng2015-06-01T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1677-55382015000200274Revistahttp://www.brazjurol.com.br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br1677-61191677-5538opendoar:2015-06-01T00:00International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Incidence of retrorenal colon during percutaneous nephrolithotomy
title Incidence of retrorenal colon during percutaneous nephrolithotomy
spellingShingle Incidence of retrorenal colon during percutaneous nephrolithotomy
Balasar,Mehmet
Colon
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Nephrostomy, Percutaneous
title_short Incidence of retrorenal colon during percutaneous nephrolithotomy
title_full Incidence of retrorenal colon during percutaneous nephrolithotomy
title_fullStr Incidence of retrorenal colon during percutaneous nephrolithotomy
title_full_unstemmed Incidence of retrorenal colon during percutaneous nephrolithotomy
title_sort Incidence of retrorenal colon during percutaneous nephrolithotomy
author Balasar,Mehmet
author_facet Balasar,Mehmet
Kandemir,Abdülkadir
Poyraz,Necdet
Unal,Yunus
Ozturk,Ahmet
author_role author
author2 Kandemir,Abdülkadir
Poyraz,Necdet
Unal,Yunus
Ozturk,Ahmet
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Balasar,Mehmet
Kandemir,Abdülkadir
Poyraz,Necdet
Unal,Yunus
Ozturk,Ahmet
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Colon
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Nephrostomy, Percutaneous
topic Colon
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Nephrostomy, Percutaneous
description Objective The aim of this study was to investigate retrorenal colon incidence in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) interventions made in our clinic. Materials and Methods Clinical data of 804 PNL patients, accumulated over a 7 year period (2006-2012), was surveyed. The patient files were reviewed retrospectively, and only those who had abdominal computed tomography (CT) images before PNL intervention were included in the study. In the CT images, the position of both the ascending and descending colon in relation to the right and left kidneys were evaluated. Results According to our hospital reports, 394 patients with CT images were included in the present study 27 patients (6.9%) had retrorenal colon, of which 18 (4.6%) were on the left side, 4 (1.0%) on the right side and 5 (1.3%) had bilateral retrorenal colons. Colonic perforation complication was seen only in two patients and the colonic perforation rate was 0.3%. These two cases had no CT images. Conclusions PNL, in the process of becoming the standard treatment modality, is a safe and reliable technique for renal stone treatment. Colonic injury should be taken into consideration during PNL interventions of the lower pole of the kidney (especially on the left side) due to the location of retrorenal colon.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382015000200274
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382015000200274
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.02.13
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv International braz j urol v.41 n.2 2015
reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron:SBU
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron_str SBU
institution SBU
reponame_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
collection International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br
_version_ 1750318074106478592