68Ga-Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (pet) in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Matushita,Cristina S.
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Silva,Ana M. Marques da, Schuck,Phelipi N., Bardisserotto,Matteo, Piant,Diego B., Pereira,Jonatas L., Cerci,Juliano J., Coura Filho,George B., Esteves,Fabio P., Amorim,Barbara J., Gomes,Gustavo V., Brito,Ana Emília T., Bernardo,Wanderley M., Mundstock,Eduardo, Fanti,Stefano, Macedo,Bruna, Roman,Diego H., Tem-Pass,Cinthia Scatolin, Hochhegger,Bruno
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: International Braz J Urol (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382021000400705
Resumo: ABSTRACT Introduction: Prostate cancer (PC) is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer in males. 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT, a non-invasive diagnostic tool to evaluate PC with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression, has emerged as a more accurate alternative to assess disease staging. We aimed to identify predictors of positive 68Ga-PSMA PET and the accuracy of this technique. Materials and methods: Diagnostic accuracy cross-sectional study with prospective and retrospective approaches. We performed a comprehensive literature search on PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase database in search of studies including PC patients submitted to radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy with curative intent and presented biochemical recurrence following ASTRO 1996 criteria. A total of 35 studies involving 3910 patients submitted to 68-Ga-PSMA PET were included and independently assessed by two authors: 8 studies on diagnosis, four on staging, and 23 studies on restaging purposes. The significance level was α=0.05. Results: pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.90 (0.86-0.93) and 0.90 (0.82-0.96), respectively, for diagnostic purposes; as for staging, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.93 (0.86-0.98) and 0.96 (0.92-0.99), respectively. In the restaging scenario, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.76 (0.74-0.78) and 0.45 (0.27-0.58), respectively, considering the identification of prostate cancer in each described situation. We also obtained specificity and sensitivity results for PSA subdivisions. Conclusion: 68Ga-PSMA PET provides higher sensitivity and specificity than traditional imaging for prostate cancer.
id SBU-1_2b0c0d81ff42d39264b9d2eb2618d624
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1677-55382021000400705
network_acronym_str SBU-1
network_name_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling 68Ga-Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (pet) in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysisProstate cancerfamilial [Supplementary Concept]Glu-NH-CO-NH-Lys-(Ahx)-((68)Ga(HBED-CC)) [Supplementary Concept](225)Ac-PSMA-617 [Supplementary Concept]ABSTRACT Introduction: Prostate cancer (PC) is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer in males. 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT, a non-invasive diagnostic tool to evaluate PC with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression, has emerged as a more accurate alternative to assess disease staging. We aimed to identify predictors of positive 68Ga-PSMA PET and the accuracy of this technique. Materials and methods: Diagnostic accuracy cross-sectional study with prospective and retrospective approaches. We performed a comprehensive literature search on PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase database in search of studies including PC patients submitted to radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy with curative intent and presented biochemical recurrence following ASTRO 1996 criteria. A total of 35 studies involving 3910 patients submitted to 68-Ga-PSMA PET were included and independently assessed by two authors: 8 studies on diagnosis, four on staging, and 23 studies on restaging purposes. The significance level was α=0.05. Results: pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.90 (0.86-0.93) and 0.90 (0.82-0.96), respectively, for diagnostic purposes; as for staging, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.93 (0.86-0.98) and 0.96 (0.92-0.99), respectively. In the restaging scenario, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.76 (0.74-0.78) and 0.45 (0.27-0.58), respectively, considering the identification of prostate cancer in each described situation. We also obtained specificity and sensitivity results for PSA subdivisions. Conclusion: 68Ga-PSMA PET provides higher sensitivity and specificity than traditional imaging for prostate cancer.Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia2021-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382021000400705International braz j urol v.47 n.4 2021reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)instacron:SBU10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2019.0817info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMatushita,Cristina S.Silva,Ana M. Marques daSchuck,Phelipi N.Bardisserotto,MatteoPiant,Diego B.Pereira,Jonatas L.Cerci,Juliano J.Coura Filho,George B.Esteves,Fabio P.Amorim,Barbara J.Gomes,Gustavo V.Brito,Ana Emília T.Bernardo,Wanderley M.Mundstock,EduardoFanti,StefanoMacedo,BrunaRoman,Diego H.Tem-Pass,Cinthia ScatolinHochhegger,Brunoeng2021-07-27T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1677-55382021000400705Revistahttp://www.brazjurol.com.br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br1677-61191677-5538opendoar:2021-07-27T00:00International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv 68Ga-Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (pet) in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title 68Ga-Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (pet) in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
spellingShingle 68Ga-Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (pet) in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Matushita,Cristina S.
Prostate cancer
familial [Supplementary Concept]
Glu-NH-CO-NH-Lys-(Ahx)-((68)Ga(HBED-CC)) [Supplementary Concept]
(225)Ac-PSMA-617 [Supplementary Concept]
title_short 68Ga-Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (pet) in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full 68Ga-Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (pet) in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr 68Ga-Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (pet) in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed 68Ga-Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (pet) in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort 68Ga-Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (pet) in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
author Matushita,Cristina S.
author_facet Matushita,Cristina S.
Silva,Ana M. Marques da
Schuck,Phelipi N.
Bardisserotto,Matteo
Piant,Diego B.
Pereira,Jonatas L.
Cerci,Juliano J.
Coura Filho,George B.
Esteves,Fabio P.
Amorim,Barbara J.
Gomes,Gustavo V.
Brito,Ana Emília T.
Bernardo,Wanderley M.
Mundstock,Eduardo
Fanti,Stefano
Macedo,Bruna
Roman,Diego H.
Tem-Pass,Cinthia Scatolin
Hochhegger,Bruno
author_role author
author2 Silva,Ana M. Marques da
Schuck,Phelipi N.
Bardisserotto,Matteo
Piant,Diego B.
Pereira,Jonatas L.
Cerci,Juliano J.
Coura Filho,George B.
Esteves,Fabio P.
Amorim,Barbara J.
Gomes,Gustavo V.
Brito,Ana Emília T.
Bernardo,Wanderley M.
Mundstock,Eduardo
Fanti,Stefano
Macedo,Bruna
Roman,Diego H.
Tem-Pass,Cinthia Scatolin
Hochhegger,Bruno
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Matushita,Cristina S.
Silva,Ana M. Marques da
Schuck,Phelipi N.
Bardisserotto,Matteo
Piant,Diego B.
Pereira,Jonatas L.
Cerci,Juliano J.
Coura Filho,George B.
Esteves,Fabio P.
Amorim,Barbara J.
Gomes,Gustavo V.
Brito,Ana Emília T.
Bernardo,Wanderley M.
Mundstock,Eduardo
Fanti,Stefano
Macedo,Bruna
Roman,Diego H.
Tem-Pass,Cinthia Scatolin
Hochhegger,Bruno
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Prostate cancer
familial [Supplementary Concept]
Glu-NH-CO-NH-Lys-(Ahx)-((68)Ga(HBED-CC)) [Supplementary Concept]
(225)Ac-PSMA-617 [Supplementary Concept]
topic Prostate cancer
familial [Supplementary Concept]
Glu-NH-CO-NH-Lys-(Ahx)-((68)Ga(HBED-CC)) [Supplementary Concept]
(225)Ac-PSMA-617 [Supplementary Concept]
description ABSTRACT Introduction: Prostate cancer (PC) is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer in males. 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT, a non-invasive diagnostic tool to evaluate PC with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression, has emerged as a more accurate alternative to assess disease staging. We aimed to identify predictors of positive 68Ga-PSMA PET and the accuracy of this technique. Materials and methods: Diagnostic accuracy cross-sectional study with prospective and retrospective approaches. We performed a comprehensive literature search on PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase database in search of studies including PC patients submitted to radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy with curative intent and presented biochemical recurrence following ASTRO 1996 criteria. A total of 35 studies involving 3910 patients submitted to 68-Ga-PSMA PET were included and independently assessed by two authors: 8 studies on diagnosis, four on staging, and 23 studies on restaging purposes. The significance level was α=0.05. Results: pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.90 (0.86-0.93) and 0.90 (0.82-0.96), respectively, for diagnostic purposes; as for staging, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.93 (0.86-0.98) and 0.96 (0.92-0.99), respectively. In the restaging scenario, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.76 (0.74-0.78) and 0.45 (0.27-0.58), respectively, considering the identification of prostate cancer in each described situation. We also obtained specificity and sensitivity results for PSA subdivisions. Conclusion: 68Ga-PSMA PET provides higher sensitivity and specificity than traditional imaging for prostate cancer.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382021000400705
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382021000400705
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2019.0817
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv International braz j urol v.47 n.4 2021
reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron:SBU
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron_str SBU
institution SBU
reponame_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
collection International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br
_version_ 1750318078081630208