Can bipolar vaporization be considered an alternative energy source in the endoscopic treatment of urethral strictures and bladder neck contracture?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2008 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | International Braz J Urol (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382008000500006 |
Resumo: | OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the outcome of bipolar energy by using PlasmaKinetic™ cystoscope instruments in the treatment of urethral stricture and bladder neck contracture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-two male patients with urethral stricture and five with bladder neck contracture were treated by endoscopic bipolar vaporization. The most common etiology for stricture formation was iatrogenic (85.2%) and the mean stricture length was 12.2 mm. All patients were evaluated with urethrography and uroflowmetry one month and 3 months after surgery. Urethroscopy was routinely performed at the end of the first year. Preoperative mean maximum flow rate (Q max) was 4.9 mL/s for urethral stricture and mean Q max was 3.4 mL/s for bladder neck contracture. The results were considered as "successful” in patients where re-stenosis was not identified with both urethrography and urethroscopy. Minimum follow-up was 13.8 months (range 12 to 20). RESULTS: Tissue removal was rapid, bleeding was negligible and excellent visualization was maintained throughout the vaporization of the fibrotic tissue. Postoperative mean Q max was 14.9 mL/s and the success rate was 77.3% for urethral stricture at mean follow-up time of 14.2 months. The success rate was 60% with a mean follow-up time of 12.2 months for bladder neck contracture and the mean Q max was 16.2 mL/s, postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that bipolar vaporization is a safe, inexpensive and reliable procedure with good results, minimal surgical morbidity, negligible blood loss, and thus, it could be considered as a new therapeutic option for the endoscopic treatment of urethral stricture and bladder neck contracture. |
id |
SBU-1_3d59f6dd23e7efaf5f16e6a6c4d6775a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1677-55382008000500006 |
network_acronym_str |
SBU-1 |
network_name_str |
International Braz J Urol (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Can bipolar vaporization be considered an alternative energy source in the endoscopic treatment of urethral strictures and bladder neck contracture?urethraurethral strictureendoscopyvaporizationbipolar energyOBJECTIVE: We evaluated the outcome of bipolar energy by using PlasmaKinetic™ cystoscope instruments in the treatment of urethral stricture and bladder neck contracture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-two male patients with urethral stricture and five with bladder neck contracture were treated by endoscopic bipolar vaporization. The most common etiology for stricture formation was iatrogenic (85.2%) and the mean stricture length was 12.2 mm. All patients were evaluated with urethrography and uroflowmetry one month and 3 months after surgery. Urethroscopy was routinely performed at the end of the first year. Preoperative mean maximum flow rate (Q max) was 4.9 mL/s for urethral stricture and mean Q max was 3.4 mL/s for bladder neck contracture. The results were considered as "successful” in patients where re-stenosis was not identified with both urethrography and urethroscopy. Minimum follow-up was 13.8 months (range 12 to 20). RESULTS: Tissue removal was rapid, bleeding was negligible and excellent visualization was maintained throughout the vaporization of the fibrotic tissue. Postoperative mean Q max was 14.9 mL/s and the success rate was 77.3% for urethral stricture at mean follow-up time of 14.2 months. The success rate was 60% with a mean follow-up time of 12.2 months for bladder neck contracture and the mean Q max was 16.2 mL/s, postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that bipolar vaporization is a safe, inexpensive and reliable procedure with good results, minimal surgical morbidity, negligible blood loss, and thus, it could be considered as a new therapeutic option for the endoscopic treatment of urethral stricture and bladder neck contracture.Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia2008-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382008000500006International braz j urol v.34 n.5 2008reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)instacron:SBU10.1590/S1677-55382008000500006info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBasok,Erem K.Basaran,AdnanGurbuz,CenkYildirim,AsifTokuc,Resiteng2008-12-11T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1677-55382008000500006Revistahttp://www.brazjurol.com.br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br1677-61191677-5538opendoar:2008-12-11T00:00International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Can bipolar vaporization be considered an alternative energy source in the endoscopic treatment of urethral strictures and bladder neck contracture? |
title |
Can bipolar vaporization be considered an alternative energy source in the endoscopic treatment of urethral strictures and bladder neck contracture? |
spellingShingle |
Can bipolar vaporization be considered an alternative energy source in the endoscopic treatment of urethral strictures and bladder neck contracture? Basok,Erem K. urethra urethral stricture endoscopy vaporization bipolar energy |
title_short |
Can bipolar vaporization be considered an alternative energy source in the endoscopic treatment of urethral strictures and bladder neck contracture? |
title_full |
Can bipolar vaporization be considered an alternative energy source in the endoscopic treatment of urethral strictures and bladder neck contracture? |
title_fullStr |
Can bipolar vaporization be considered an alternative energy source in the endoscopic treatment of urethral strictures and bladder neck contracture? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Can bipolar vaporization be considered an alternative energy source in the endoscopic treatment of urethral strictures and bladder neck contracture? |
title_sort |
Can bipolar vaporization be considered an alternative energy source in the endoscopic treatment of urethral strictures and bladder neck contracture? |
author |
Basok,Erem K. |
author_facet |
Basok,Erem K. Basaran,Adnan Gurbuz,Cenk Yildirim,Asif Tokuc,Resit |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Basaran,Adnan Gurbuz,Cenk Yildirim,Asif Tokuc,Resit |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Basok,Erem K. Basaran,Adnan Gurbuz,Cenk Yildirim,Asif Tokuc,Resit |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
urethra urethral stricture endoscopy vaporization bipolar energy |
topic |
urethra urethral stricture endoscopy vaporization bipolar energy |
description |
OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the outcome of bipolar energy by using PlasmaKinetic™ cystoscope instruments in the treatment of urethral stricture and bladder neck contracture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-two male patients with urethral stricture and five with bladder neck contracture were treated by endoscopic bipolar vaporization. The most common etiology for stricture formation was iatrogenic (85.2%) and the mean stricture length was 12.2 mm. All patients were evaluated with urethrography and uroflowmetry one month and 3 months after surgery. Urethroscopy was routinely performed at the end of the first year. Preoperative mean maximum flow rate (Q max) was 4.9 mL/s for urethral stricture and mean Q max was 3.4 mL/s for bladder neck contracture. The results were considered as "successful” in patients where re-stenosis was not identified with both urethrography and urethroscopy. Minimum follow-up was 13.8 months (range 12 to 20). RESULTS: Tissue removal was rapid, bleeding was negligible and excellent visualization was maintained throughout the vaporization of the fibrotic tissue. Postoperative mean Q max was 14.9 mL/s and the success rate was 77.3% for urethral stricture at mean follow-up time of 14.2 months. The success rate was 60% with a mean follow-up time of 12.2 months for bladder neck contracture and the mean Q max was 16.2 mL/s, postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that bipolar vaporization is a safe, inexpensive and reliable procedure with good results, minimal surgical morbidity, negligible blood loss, and thus, it could be considered as a new therapeutic option for the endoscopic treatment of urethral stricture and bladder neck contracture. |
publishDate |
2008 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2008-10-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382008000500006 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382008000500006 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S1677-55382008000500006 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
International braz j urol v.34 n.5 2008 reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU) instacron:SBU |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU) |
instacron_str |
SBU |
institution |
SBU |
reponame_str |
International Braz J Urol (Online) |
collection |
International Braz J Urol (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br |
_version_ |
1750318070899933184 |