Current controversies in reconstructive surgery of the anterior urethra: a clinical overview

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Barbagli,Guido
Data de Publicação: 2012
Outros Autores: Sansalone,Salvatore, Djinovic,Rados, Romano,Giuseppe, Lazzeri,Massimo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: International Braz J Urol (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382012000300003
Resumo: We performed an overview of the surgical techniques suggested for the treatment of anterior urethral strictures using MEDLINE. In applying the MEDLINE search, we used the "MeSH" (Medical Subject Heading) and "free text" protocols. The MeSH search was conducted by combining the following terms: "urethral stricture", "flap", "graft", "oral mucosa", "urethroplasty", "urethrotomy" and "failed hypospadias". Multiple "free text" searches were performed individually applying the following terms through all fields of the records: "reconstructive urethral surgery", "end-to-end anastomosis", "one-stage", "two stage". Descriptive statistics of the articles were provided. Meta-analyses were not employed. Seventy-eight articles were determined to be germane in this review. Six main topics were identified as controversial in anterior urethra surgery: the use of oral mucosa vs penile skin; the use of free grafts vs pedicled flaps in penile urethroplasty; the use of grafts vs anastomotic repair in bulbar urethral strictures; the use of dorsal vs ventral placement of the graft in bulbar urethroplasty; the use of definitive perineal urethrostomy vs one-stage repair in complex urethral strictures; the surgical options for patients with failed hypospadias repair. Different points of view are documented and presented in the literature by various authors from different countries. The aim of this clinical overview is to survey the main controversial issues in surgical reconstruction of the anterior urethra focusing on the use of flap or graft, substitute material, type of surgery and challenging situations, such as failed hypospadias or complex urethral stricture repair.
id SBU-1_3eb28cab3fe452450457ca757801ba17
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1677-55382012000300003
network_acronym_str SBU-1
network_name_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Current controversies in reconstructive surgery of the anterior urethra: a clinical overviewUrethraurethral strictureurethroplastyoral mucosagenital skinWe performed an overview of the surgical techniques suggested for the treatment of anterior urethral strictures using MEDLINE. In applying the MEDLINE search, we used the "MeSH" (Medical Subject Heading) and "free text" protocols. The MeSH search was conducted by combining the following terms: "urethral stricture", "flap", "graft", "oral mucosa", "urethroplasty", "urethrotomy" and "failed hypospadias". Multiple "free text" searches were performed individually applying the following terms through all fields of the records: "reconstructive urethral surgery", "end-to-end anastomosis", "one-stage", "two stage". Descriptive statistics of the articles were provided. Meta-analyses were not employed. Seventy-eight articles were determined to be germane in this review. Six main topics were identified as controversial in anterior urethra surgery: the use of oral mucosa vs penile skin; the use of free grafts vs pedicled flaps in penile urethroplasty; the use of grafts vs anastomotic repair in bulbar urethral strictures; the use of dorsal vs ventral placement of the graft in bulbar urethroplasty; the use of definitive perineal urethrostomy vs one-stage repair in complex urethral strictures; the surgical options for patients with failed hypospadias repair. Different points of view are documented and presented in the literature by various authors from different countries. The aim of this clinical overview is to survey the main controversial issues in surgical reconstruction of the anterior urethra focusing on the use of flap or graft, substitute material, type of surgery and challenging situations, such as failed hypospadias or complex urethral stricture repair.Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia2012-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382012000300003International braz j urol v.38 n.3 2012reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)instacron:SBU10.1590/S1677-55382012000300003info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBarbagli,GuidoSansalone,SalvatoreDjinovic,RadosRomano,GiuseppeLazzeri,Massimoeng2012-07-20T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1677-55382012000300003Revistahttp://www.brazjurol.com.br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br1677-61191677-5538opendoar:2012-07-20T00:00International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Current controversies in reconstructive surgery of the anterior urethra: a clinical overview
title Current controversies in reconstructive surgery of the anterior urethra: a clinical overview
spellingShingle Current controversies in reconstructive surgery of the anterior urethra: a clinical overview
Barbagli,Guido
Urethra
urethral stricture
urethroplasty
oral mucosa
genital skin
title_short Current controversies in reconstructive surgery of the anterior urethra: a clinical overview
title_full Current controversies in reconstructive surgery of the anterior urethra: a clinical overview
title_fullStr Current controversies in reconstructive surgery of the anterior urethra: a clinical overview
title_full_unstemmed Current controversies in reconstructive surgery of the anterior urethra: a clinical overview
title_sort Current controversies in reconstructive surgery of the anterior urethra: a clinical overview
author Barbagli,Guido
author_facet Barbagli,Guido
Sansalone,Salvatore
Djinovic,Rados
Romano,Giuseppe
Lazzeri,Massimo
author_role author
author2 Sansalone,Salvatore
Djinovic,Rados
Romano,Giuseppe
Lazzeri,Massimo
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Barbagli,Guido
Sansalone,Salvatore
Djinovic,Rados
Romano,Giuseppe
Lazzeri,Massimo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Urethra
urethral stricture
urethroplasty
oral mucosa
genital skin
topic Urethra
urethral stricture
urethroplasty
oral mucosa
genital skin
description We performed an overview of the surgical techniques suggested for the treatment of anterior urethral strictures using MEDLINE. In applying the MEDLINE search, we used the "MeSH" (Medical Subject Heading) and "free text" protocols. The MeSH search was conducted by combining the following terms: "urethral stricture", "flap", "graft", "oral mucosa", "urethroplasty", "urethrotomy" and "failed hypospadias". Multiple "free text" searches were performed individually applying the following terms through all fields of the records: "reconstructive urethral surgery", "end-to-end anastomosis", "one-stage", "two stage". Descriptive statistics of the articles were provided. Meta-analyses were not employed. Seventy-eight articles were determined to be germane in this review. Six main topics were identified as controversial in anterior urethra surgery: the use of oral mucosa vs penile skin; the use of free grafts vs pedicled flaps in penile urethroplasty; the use of grafts vs anastomotic repair in bulbar urethral strictures; the use of dorsal vs ventral placement of the graft in bulbar urethroplasty; the use of definitive perineal urethrostomy vs one-stage repair in complex urethral strictures; the surgical options for patients with failed hypospadias repair. Different points of view are documented and presented in the literature by various authors from different countries. The aim of this clinical overview is to survey the main controversial issues in surgical reconstruction of the anterior urethra focusing on the use of flap or graft, substitute material, type of surgery and challenging situations, such as failed hypospadias or complex urethral stricture repair.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382012000300003
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382012000300003
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1677-55382012000300003
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv International braz j urol v.38 n.3 2012
reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron:SBU
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron_str SBU
institution SBU
reponame_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
collection International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br
_version_ 1750318072746475520