Can extended upper pole ureterectomy prevent ureteral stump syndrome after proximal approach for duplex kidneys?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cezarino,Bruno Nicolino
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Lopes,Roberto Iglesias, Berjeaut,Ricardo Haidar, Dénes,Francisco Tibor
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: International Braz J Urol (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382021000400821
Resumo: ABSTRACT Introduction: Symptomatic duplex kidneys usually present with recurrent urinary tract infection due to ureteral obstruction (megaureter, ureterocele or ectopic ureter) and/or vesicoureteral reflux. Upper-pole nephrectomy is a widely accepted procedure to correct symptomatic duplex systems with poor functioning moieties, also known as upper or proximal approach. The distal ureteral stump syndrome (DUSS) can be a late complication of this approach. There is no consensus upon the length of ureteral dissection and the better approach to symptomatic disease in duplex systems, so we aim to identify if extended ureteral dissection can prevent DUSS in top-down approach. Materials and Methods: Forty-four consecutive patients with symptomatic duplex system were retrospectively classified into two groups: those with limited ureteral excision after heminephrectomy (HN) (group-1) and those with extended ureterectomy after HN (group-2). Patients were followed-up for at least 36 months regarding outcomes of distal ureteral stump. Results: Overall complication was 20%. A total of 8 patients required unplanned further surgery in Group-1 (30%) whereas only 1 patient required unplanned surgery in group 2 (6%) (p=0.07). Subgroup analysis showed that Group-1 presented more DUSS requiring surgery during follow-up than group-2 (p=0.04). Factors possibly affecting complications incidence (such as ureterocele or ectopic ureter) did not differ between groups (p=0.72 and p=0.78). Conclusion: Upper pole nephrectomy should be performed with extended distal ureteral dissection to prevent ureteral stump complications.
id SBU-1_464cedb5ff0747116fe12350527e6e5e
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1677-55382021000400821
network_acronym_str SBU-1
network_name_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Can extended upper pole ureterectomy prevent ureteral stump syndrome after proximal approach for duplex kidneys?Cakut [Supplementary Concept]UreterUrinary Tract InfectionsABSTRACT Introduction: Symptomatic duplex kidneys usually present with recurrent urinary tract infection due to ureteral obstruction (megaureter, ureterocele or ectopic ureter) and/or vesicoureteral reflux. Upper-pole nephrectomy is a widely accepted procedure to correct symptomatic duplex systems with poor functioning moieties, also known as upper or proximal approach. The distal ureteral stump syndrome (DUSS) can be a late complication of this approach. There is no consensus upon the length of ureteral dissection and the better approach to symptomatic disease in duplex systems, so we aim to identify if extended ureteral dissection can prevent DUSS in top-down approach. Materials and Methods: Forty-four consecutive patients with symptomatic duplex system were retrospectively classified into two groups: those with limited ureteral excision after heminephrectomy (HN) (group-1) and those with extended ureterectomy after HN (group-2). Patients were followed-up for at least 36 months regarding outcomes of distal ureteral stump. Results: Overall complication was 20%. A total of 8 patients required unplanned further surgery in Group-1 (30%) whereas only 1 patient required unplanned surgery in group 2 (6%) (p=0.07). Subgroup analysis showed that Group-1 presented more DUSS requiring surgery during follow-up than group-2 (p=0.04). Factors possibly affecting complications incidence (such as ureterocele or ectopic ureter) did not differ between groups (p=0.72 and p=0.78). Conclusion: Upper pole nephrectomy should be performed with extended distal ureteral dissection to prevent ureteral stump complications.Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia2021-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382021000400821International braz j urol v.47 n.4 2021reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)instacron:SBU10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2020.0686info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCezarino,Bruno NicolinoLopes,Roberto IglesiasBerjeaut,Ricardo HaidarDénes,Francisco Tiboreng2021-07-27T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1677-55382021000400821Revistahttp://www.brazjurol.com.br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br1677-61191677-5538opendoar:2021-07-27T00:00International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Can extended upper pole ureterectomy prevent ureteral stump syndrome after proximal approach for duplex kidneys?
title Can extended upper pole ureterectomy prevent ureteral stump syndrome after proximal approach for duplex kidneys?
spellingShingle Can extended upper pole ureterectomy prevent ureteral stump syndrome after proximal approach for duplex kidneys?
Cezarino,Bruno Nicolino
Cakut [Supplementary Concept]
Ureter
Urinary Tract Infections
title_short Can extended upper pole ureterectomy prevent ureteral stump syndrome after proximal approach for duplex kidneys?
title_full Can extended upper pole ureterectomy prevent ureteral stump syndrome after proximal approach for duplex kidneys?
title_fullStr Can extended upper pole ureterectomy prevent ureteral stump syndrome after proximal approach for duplex kidneys?
title_full_unstemmed Can extended upper pole ureterectomy prevent ureteral stump syndrome after proximal approach for duplex kidneys?
title_sort Can extended upper pole ureterectomy prevent ureteral stump syndrome after proximal approach for duplex kidneys?
author Cezarino,Bruno Nicolino
author_facet Cezarino,Bruno Nicolino
Lopes,Roberto Iglesias
Berjeaut,Ricardo Haidar
Dénes,Francisco Tibor
author_role author
author2 Lopes,Roberto Iglesias
Berjeaut,Ricardo Haidar
Dénes,Francisco Tibor
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cezarino,Bruno Nicolino
Lopes,Roberto Iglesias
Berjeaut,Ricardo Haidar
Dénes,Francisco Tibor
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Cakut [Supplementary Concept]
Ureter
Urinary Tract Infections
topic Cakut [Supplementary Concept]
Ureter
Urinary Tract Infections
description ABSTRACT Introduction: Symptomatic duplex kidneys usually present with recurrent urinary tract infection due to ureteral obstruction (megaureter, ureterocele or ectopic ureter) and/or vesicoureteral reflux. Upper-pole nephrectomy is a widely accepted procedure to correct symptomatic duplex systems with poor functioning moieties, also known as upper or proximal approach. The distal ureteral stump syndrome (DUSS) can be a late complication of this approach. There is no consensus upon the length of ureteral dissection and the better approach to symptomatic disease in duplex systems, so we aim to identify if extended ureteral dissection can prevent DUSS in top-down approach. Materials and Methods: Forty-four consecutive patients with symptomatic duplex system were retrospectively classified into two groups: those with limited ureteral excision after heminephrectomy (HN) (group-1) and those with extended ureterectomy after HN (group-2). Patients were followed-up for at least 36 months regarding outcomes of distal ureteral stump. Results: Overall complication was 20%. A total of 8 patients required unplanned further surgery in Group-1 (30%) whereas only 1 patient required unplanned surgery in group 2 (6%) (p=0.07). Subgroup analysis showed that Group-1 presented more DUSS requiring surgery during follow-up than group-2 (p=0.04). Factors possibly affecting complications incidence (such as ureterocele or ectopic ureter) did not differ between groups (p=0.72 and p=0.78). Conclusion: Upper pole nephrectomy should be performed with extended distal ureteral dissection to prevent ureteral stump complications.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382021000400821
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382021000400821
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2020.0686
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv International braz j urol v.47 n.4 2021
reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron:SBU
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron_str SBU
institution SBU
reponame_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
collection International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br
_version_ 1750318078098407424