Objective measurements of the penile angulation are significantly different than self-estimated magnitude among patients with penile curvature

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Liguori,Giovanni
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Salonia,Andrea, Garaffa,Giulio, Chiriacò,Giovanni, Pavan,Nicola, Cavallini,Giorgio, Trombetta,Carlo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: International Braz J Urol (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382018000300555
Resumo: ABSTRACT Introduction: The study was aimed to assess the presence of actual differences between the objective and the perceived magnitude of a curvature between patients affected by Peyronie's disease (PD) and congenital penile curvature (CPC). Materials and Methods: Wee analysed a cohort of 88 consecutive patients seeking medi- cal help for either CPC or PD. All patients were invited to provide a self-made drawing of their penis in erection in order to obtain self-provided description of the deformity. An objective measurement of the deformity was also performed drawing two intersecting lines through the center of the distal and proximal straight section of the penile shaft. Results: Our findings showed significant differences between patient self-estimation and the objective measurements of the penile angulation performed by trained experts, with only 32% of patients correctly assessing their own curvature. Overall, patients tended to overestimate (56%) their degree of curvature, but the results are different in patients with PD than those with CPC. In the 60 men (68%) who did not accurately assess their curvature, PD patients generally overestimated their curvature versus CPC patients (67% vs 16%). On the contrary CPC patients underestimated their curvature compared to PD (42% vs. 4%). Conclusion: In order to improve patients' satisfaction rates, the surgeon needs to take into consideration the patient's perception of the deformity when planning the type of surgical correction.
id SBU-1_4b4cd1c4a551a9833e56a34ab655a3e6
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1677-55382018000300555
network_acronym_str SBU-1
network_name_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Objective measurements of the penile angulation are significantly different than self-estimated magnitude among patients with penile curvaturePenile IndurationPenisPenile ErectionABSTRACT Introduction: The study was aimed to assess the presence of actual differences between the objective and the perceived magnitude of a curvature between patients affected by Peyronie's disease (PD) and congenital penile curvature (CPC). Materials and Methods: Wee analysed a cohort of 88 consecutive patients seeking medi- cal help for either CPC or PD. All patients were invited to provide a self-made drawing of their penis in erection in order to obtain self-provided description of the deformity. An objective measurement of the deformity was also performed drawing two intersecting lines through the center of the distal and proximal straight section of the penile shaft. Results: Our findings showed significant differences between patient self-estimation and the objective measurements of the penile angulation performed by trained experts, with only 32% of patients correctly assessing their own curvature. Overall, patients tended to overestimate (56%) their degree of curvature, but the results are different in patients with PD than those with CPC. In the 60 men (68%) who did not accurately assess their curvature, PD patients generally overestimated their curvature versus CPC patients (67% vs 16%). On the contrary CPC patients underestimated their curvature compared to PD (42% vs. 4%). Conclusion: In order to improve patients' satisfaction rates, the surgeon needs to take into consideration the patient's perception of the deformity when planning the type of surgical correction.Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia2018-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382018000300555International braz j urol v.44 n.3 2018reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)instacron:SBU10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2017.0418info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLiguori,GiovanniSalonia,AndreaGaraffa,GiulioChiriacò,GiovanniPavan,NicolaCavallini,GiorgioTrombetta,Carloeng2018-06-22T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1677-55382018000300555Revistahttp://www.brazjurol.com.br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br1677-61191677-5538opendoar:2018-06-22T00:00International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Objective measurements of the penile angulation are significantly different than self-estimated magnitude among patients with penile curvature
title Objective measurements of the penile angulation are significantly different than self-estimated magnitude among patients with penile curvature
spellingShingle Objective measurements of the penile angulation are significantly different than self-estimated magnitude among patients with penile curvature
Liguori,Giovanni
Penile Induration
Penis
Penile Erection
title_short Objective measurements of the penile angulation are significantly different than self-estimated magnitude among patients with penile curvature
title_full Objective measurements of the penile angulation are significantly different than self-estimated magnitude among patients with penile curvature
title_fullStr Objective measurements of the penile angulation are significantly different than self-estimated magnitude among patients with penile curvature
title_full_unstemmed Objective measurements of the penile angulation are significantly different than self-estimated magnitude among patients with penile curvature
title_sort Objective measurements of the penile angulation are significantly different than self-estimated magnitude among patients with penile curvature
author Liguori,Giovanni
author_facet Liguori,Giovanni
Salonia,Andrea
Garaffa,Giulio
Chiriacò,Giovanni
Pavan,Nicola
Cavallini,Giorgio
Trombetta,Carlo
author_role author
author2 Salonia,Andrea
Garaffa,Giulio
Chiriacò,Giovanni
Pavan,Nicola
Cavallini,Giorgio
Trombetta,Carlo
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Liguori,Giovanni
Salonia,Andrea
Garaffa,Giulio
Chiriacò,Giovanni
Pavan,Nicola
Cavallini,Giorgio
Trombetta,Carlo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Penile Induration
Penis
Penile Erection
topic Penile Induration
Penis
Penile Erection
description ABSTRACT Introduction: The study was aimed to assess the presence of actual differences between the objective and the perceived magnitude of a curvature between patients affected by Peyronie's disease (PD) and congenital penile curvature (CPC). Materials and Methods: Wee analysed a cohort of 88 consecutive patients seeking medi- cal help for either CPC or PD. All patients were invited to provide a self-made drawing of their penis in erection in order to obtain self-provided description of the deformity. An objective measurement of the deformity was also performed drawing two intersecting lines through the center of the distal and proximal straight section of the penile shaft. Results: Our findings showed significant differences between patient self-estimation and the objective measurements of the penile angulation performed by trained experts, with only 32% of patients correctly assessing their own curvature. Overall, patients tended to overestimate (56%) their degree of curvature, but the results are different in patients with PD than those with CPC. In the 60 men (68%) who did not accurately assess their curvature, PD patients generally overestimated their curvature versus CPC patients (67% vs 16%). On the contrary CPC patients underestimated their curvature compared to PD (42% vs. 4%). Conclusion: In order to improve patients' satisfaction rates, the surgeon needs to take into consideration the patient's perception of the deformity when planning the type of surgical correction.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382018000300555
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382018000300555
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2017.0418
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv International braz j urol v.44 n.3 2018
reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron:SBU
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron_str SBU
institution SBU
reponame_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
collection International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br
_version_ 1750318076248719360