Are the urology operating room personnel aware about the ionizing radiation?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Tok,Adem
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Akbas,Alparslan, Aytan,Nimet, Aliskan,Tamer, Cicekbilek,Izzet, Kaba,Mehmet, Tepeler,Abdulkadir
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: International Braz J Urol (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382015000500982
Resumo: ABSTRACT Purpose: We assessed and evaluated attitudes and knowledge regarding ionizing radiation of urology surgery room staff. Materials and Methods: A questionnaire was sent by e-mail to urology surgery room personnel in Turkey, between June and August 2013. The questionnaire included demographic questions and questions regarding radiation exposure and protection. Results: In total, 127 questionnaires were answered. Of them, 62 (48.8%) were nurses, 51 (40.2%) were other personnel, and 14 (11%) were radiological technicians. In total, 113 (89%) participants had some knowledge of radiation, but only 56 (44.1%) had received specific education or training regarding the harmful effects of radiation. In total, 92 (72.4%) participants indicated that they used a lead apron and a thyroid shield. In the subgroup that had received education about the harmful effects of radiation, the use ratio for all protective procedures was 21.4% (n=12); this ratio was only 2.8% (n=2) for those with no specific training; the difference was statistically significant (p=0.004). Regarding dosimeters, the use rates were 100% for radiology technicians, 46.8% for nurses, and 31.4% for other hospital personnel; these differences were statistically significant (p<0.001). No significant relationship between working period in the surgery room, number of daily fluoroscopy procedures, education, task, and use of radiation protection measures was found. Conclusions: It is clear that operating room-allied health personnel exposed to radiation do not have sufficient knowledge of ionizing radiation and they do not take sufficient protective measures.
id SBU-1_5241d2efb70d96ed0a0df916ebb358aa
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1677-55382015000500982
network_acronym_str SBU-1
network_name_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Are the urology operating room personnel aware about the ionizing radiation?Radiation InjuriesMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresABSTRACT Purpose: We assessed and evaluated attitudes and knowledge regarding ionizing radiation of urology surgery room staff. Materials and Methods: A questionnaire was sent by e-mail to urology surgery room personnel in Turkey, between June and August 2013. The questionnaire included demographic questions and questions regarding radiation exposure and protection. Results: In total, 127 questionnaires were answered. Of them, 62 (48.8%) were nurses, 51 (40.2%) were other personnel, and 14 (11%) were radiological technicians. In total, 113 (89%) participants had some knowledge of radiation, but only 56 (44.1%) had received specific education or training regarding the harmful effects of radiation. In total, 92 (72.4%) participants indicated that they used a lead apron and a thyroid shield. In the subgroup that had received education about the harmful effects of radiation, the use ratio for all protective procedures was 21.4% (n=12); this ratio was only 2.8% (n=2) for those with no specific training; the difference was statistically significant (p=0.004). Regarding dosimeters, the use rates were 100% for radiology technicians, 46.8% for nurses, and 31.4% for other hospital personnel; these differences were statistically significant (p<0.001). No significant relationship between working period in the surgery room, number of daily fluoroscopy procedures, education, task, and use of radiation protection measures was found. Conclusions: It is clear that operating room-allied health personnel exposed to radiation do not have sufficient knowledge of ionizing radiation and they do not take sufficient protective measures.Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia2015-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382015000500982International braz j urol v.41 n.5 2015reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)instacron:SBU10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.0351info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTok,AdemAkbas,AlparslanAytan,NimetAliskan,TamerCicekbilek,IzzetKaba,MehmetTepeler,Abdulkadireng2015-11-27T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1677-55382015000500982Revistahttp://www.brazjurol.com.br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br1677-61191677-5538opendoar:2015-11-27T00:00International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Are the urology operating room personnel aware about the ionizing radiation?
title Are the urology operating room personnel aware about the ionizing radiation?
spellingShingle Are the urology operating room personnel aware about the ionizing radiation?
Tok,Adem
Radiation Injuries
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
title_short Are the urology operating room personnel aware about the ionizing radiation?
title_full Are the urology operating room personnel aware about the ionizing radiation?
title_fullStr Are the urology operating room personnel aware about the ionizing radiation?
title_full_unstemmed Are the urology operating room personnel aware about the ionizing radiation?
title_sort Are the urology operating room personnel aware about the ionizing radiation?
author Tok,Adem
author_facet Tok,Adem
Akbas,Alparslan
Aytan,Nimet
Aliskan,Tamer
Cicekbilek,Izzet
Kaba,Mehmet
Tepeler,Abdulkadir
author_role author
author2 Akbas,Alparslan
Aytan,Nimet
Aliskan,Tamer
Cicekbilek,Izzet
Kaba,Mehmet
Tepeler,Abdulkadir
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Tok,Adem
Akbas,Alparslan
Aytan,Nimet
Aliskan,Tamer
Cicekbilek,Izzet
Kaba,Mehmet
Tepeler,Abdulkadir
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Radiation Injuries
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
topic Radiation Injuries
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
description ABSTRACT Purpose: We assessed and evaluated attitudes and knowledge regarding ionizing radiation of urology surgery room staff. Materials and Methods: A questionnaire was sent by e-mail to urology surgery room personnel in Turkey, between June and August 2013. The questionnaire included demographic questions and questions regarding radiation exposure and protection. Results: In total, 127 questionnaires were answered. Of them, 62 (48.8%) were nurses, 51 (40.2%) were other personnel, and 14 (11%) were radiological technicians. In total, 113 (89%) participants had some knowledge of radiation, but only 56 (44.1%) had received specific education or training regarding the harmful effects of radiation. In total, 92 (72.4%) participants indicated that they used a lead apron and a thyroid shield. In the subgroup that had received education about the harmful effects of radiation, the use ratio for all protective procedures was 21.4% (n=12); this ratio was only 2.8% (n=2) for those with no specific training; the difference was statistically significant (p=0.004). Regarding dosimeters, the use rates were 100% for radiology technicians, 46.8% for nurses, and 31.4% for other hospital personnel; these differences were statistically significant (p<0.001). No significant relationship between working period in the surgery room, number of daily fluoroscopy procedures, education, task, and use of radiation protection measures was found. Conclusions: It is clear that operating room-allied health personnel exposed to radiation do not have sufficient knowledge of ionizing radiation and they do not take sufficient protective measures.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-10-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382015000500982
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382015000500982
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.0351
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv International braz j urol v.41 n.5 2015
reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron:SBU
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron_str SBU
institution SBU
reponame_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
collection International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br
_version_ 1750318074496548864