Current scenario of endourological treatment of kidney stones in brazil: results of a national survey

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Astolfi,Rafael Haddad
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Carrera,Raphael, Gattas,Nelson, Bertolla,Ricardo, Sepulveda,Fabio, Reggio,Ernesto, Meller,Alex Elton
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: International Braz J Urol (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382020000300400
Resumo: ABSTRACT Objective: To elucidate the current scenario of endourology in Brazil for the treatment of urinary lithiasis, with an emphasis on regional differences and the reasons why certain techniques are still underutilized. Materials and Methods: An electronic questionnaire was sent by email to the 4,745 members of the Brazilian Urological Society (BSU) in 2016 to collect information on the 3 main endourological procedures used in the treatment of nephrolithiasis: Semi-rigid ureteroscopy (URS), Flexible ureteroscopy (F-URS) and percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL). Results: A total of 1,267 urologists answered the questionnaire. It was observed that the vast majority perform URS (95.6%), while 80.2% perform F-URS and only 72.1% perform PCNL. Regarding the surgical volume, most perform up to 10 procedures per month (73.4% to 88.2%) and the main impediment was the lack of patients with the pathology (42.1% to 67.7%). The lack of equipment or hospital infrastructure was one of the main limiting factors for rigid (23%) and flexible (38.1%) URS, mainly in the North and Northeast regions of the country. Regarding PCNL, most of them reported lack of practical experience in the method (29.9%). Finally, most urologists expressed interest in taking courses in endourology. Conclusion: Ureteroscopy, rigid or flexible, is already well established in the country, requiring the direction of more resources for its practice, especially in less developed regions. Regarding PCNL a significant part of Brazilian urologists still lack practical experience in this procedure, emphasizing the need for greater investment in teaching this technique.
id SBU-1_5dedcc7d6bc6fe26fab2f33473a13be5
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1677-55382020000300400
network_acronym_str SBU-1
network_name_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Current scenario of endourological treatment of kidney stones in brazil: results of a national surveyKidney CalculiEpidemiologyUreteroscopyTherapeuticsABSTRACT Objective: To elucidate the current scenario of endourology in Brazil for the treatment of urinary lithiasis, with an emphasis on regional differences and the reasons why certain techniques are still underutilized. Materials and Methods: An electronic questionnaire was sent by email to the 4,745 members of the Brazilian Urological Society (BSU) in 2016 to collect information on the 3 main endourological procedures used in the treatment of nephrolithiasis: Semi-rigid ureteroscopy (URS), Flexible ureteroscopy (F-URS) and percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL). Results: A total of 1,267 urologists answered the questionnaire. It was observed that the vast majority perform URS (95.6%), while 80.2% perform F-URS and only 72.1% perform PCNL. Regarding the surgical volume, most perform up to 10 procedures per month (73.4% to 88.2%) and the main impediment was the lack of patients with the pathology (42.1% to 67.7%). The lack of equipment or hospital infrastructure was one of the main limiting factors for rigid (23%) and flexible (38.1%) URS, mainly in the North and Northeast regions of the country. Regarding PCNL, most of them reported lack of practical experience in the method (29.9%). Finally, most urologists expressed interest in taking courses in endourology. Conclusion: Ureteroscopy, rigid or flexible, is already well established in the country, requiring the direction of more resources for its practice, especially in less developed regions. Regarding PCNL a significant part of Brazilian urologists still lack practical experience in this procedure, emphasizing the need for greater investment in teaching this technique.Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia2020-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382020000300400International braz j urol v.46 n.3 2020reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)instacron:SBU10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2019.0363info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAstolfi,Rafael HaddadCarrera,RaphaelGattas,NelsonBertolla,RicardoSepulveda,FabioReggio,ErnestoMeller,Alex Eltoneng2020-03-25T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1677-55382020000300400Revistahttp://www.brazjurol.com.br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br1677-61191677-5538opendoar:2020-03-25T00:00International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Current scenario of endourological treatment of kidney stones in brazil: results of a national survey
title Current scenario of endourological treatment of kidney stones in brazil: results of a national survey
spellingShingle Current scenario of endourological treatment of kidney stones in brazil: results of a national survey
Astolfi,Rafael Haddad
Kidney Calculi
Epidemiology
Ureteroscopy
Therapeutics
title_short Current scenario of endourological treatment of kidney stones in brazil: results of a national survey
title_full Current scenario of endourological treatment of kidney stones in brazil: results of a national survey
title_fullStr Current scenario of endourological treatment of kidney stones in brazil: results of a national survey
title_full_unstemmed Current scenario of endourological treatment of kidney stones in brazil: results of a national survey
title_sort Current scenario of endourological treatment of kidney stones in brazil: results of a national survey
author Astolfi,Rafael Haddad
author_facet Astolfi,Rafael Haddad
Carrera,Raphael
Gattas,Nelson
Bertolla,Ricardo
Sepulveda,Fabio
Reggio,Ernesto
Meller,Alex Elton
author_role author
author2 Carrera,Raphael
Gattas,Nelson
Bertolla,Ricardo
Sepulveda,Fabio
Reggio,Ernesto
Meller,Alex Elton
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Astolfi,Rafael Haddad
Carrera,Raphael
Gattas,Nelson
Bertolla,Ricardo
Sepulveda,Fabio
Reggio,Ernesto
Meller,Alex Elton
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Kidney Calculi
Epidemiology
Ureteroscopy
Therapeutics
topic Kidney Calculi
Epidemiology
Ureteroscopy
Therapeutics
description ABSTRACT Objective: To elucidate the current scenario of endourology in Brazil for the treatment of urinary lithiasis, with an emphasis on regional differences and the reasons why certain techniques are still underutilized. Materials and Methods: An electronic questionnaire was sent by email to the 4,745 members of the Brazilian Urological Society (BSU) in 2016 to collect information on the 3 main endourological procedures used in the treatment of nephrolithiasis: Semi-rigid ureteroscopy (URS), Flexible ureteroscopy (F-URS) and percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL). Results: A total of 1,267 urologists answered the questionnaire. It was observed that the vast majority perform URS (95.6%), while 80.2% perform F-URS and only 72.1% perform PCNL. Regarding the surgical volume, most perform up to 10 procedures per month (73.4% to 88.2%) and the main impediment was the lack of patients with the pathology (42.1% to 67.7%). The lack of equipment or hospital infrastructure was one of the main limiting factors for rigid (23%) and flexible (38.1%) URS, mainly in the North and Northeast regions of the country. Regarding PCNL, most of them reported lack of practical experience in the method (29.9%). Finally, most urologists expressed interest in taking courses in endourology. Conclusion: Ureteroscopy, rigid or flexible, is already well established in the country, requiring the direction of more resources for its practice, especially in less developed regions. Regarding PCNL a significant part of Brazilian urologists still lack practical experience in this procedure, emphasizing the need for greater investment in teaching this technique.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382020000300400
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382020000300400
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2019.0363
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv International braz j urol v.46 n.3 2020
reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron:SBU
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron_str SBU
institution SBU
reponame_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
collection International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br
_version_ 1750318077301489664