Can concomitant bladder neck incision and primary valve ablation reduce early re-admission rate and secondary intervention?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Abdelhalim,Ahmed
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Hashem,Abdelwahab, Abouelenein,Ebrahim E., Atwa,Ahmed M., Soltan,Mohamed, Hafez,Ashraf T., Dawaba,Mohamed S., Helmy,Tamer E.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: International Braz J Urol (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382022000300485
Resumo: ABSTRACT Objective: To assess the effect of bladder neck morphology and its incision (BNI) in patients with posterior urethral valve (PUV) on early reintervention rate. Patients and methods: Infants undergoing PUV ablation (PVA) before 24 months of age and had at least 18 months of follow-up, were categorized into three groups according to the bladder neck appearance on baseline radiological and endoscopic examination: group 1; normal bladder neck underwent PVA, group 2; high bladder neck underwent PVA plus BNI, group 3; high bladder neck underwent PVA only. Early reintervention was defined as the need for check cystoscopy because of persistent renal function deterioration, worsening hydronephrosis and/or unsatisfactory VCUG improvement during the 1st six months post primary PVA. Results: Between 2000 and 2017, a total of 114 patients underwent PVA and met the study criteria with a median follow-up of 58 (18-230) months. For group 1, 16 (22.9%) patients needed readmission. Check cystoscopy was free and no further intervention was performed in 5(7.5%) and re-ablation was performed in 11(15.7%) patients. For group 2, 3(14.3%) patients needed reintervention. Re-ablation and re-ablation plus BNI were performed in 1(4.8%) and 2(9.5%), respectively. For group 3, cystoscopy was free in 1(4.3%), re-ablation and re-ablation plus BNI were performed 2(8.7%) and 1(4.3%), respectively. There were no significant differences in the re-admission and re-intervention rates among the three study groups (p=0.65 and p=0.50, respectively). Conclusion: In morphologically high bladder neck associated PUV, concomitant BNI with PVA doesn’t reduce early re-intervention rate.
id SBU-1_5e789ccae18ea2ffdd82d41e3ae7290d
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1677-55382022000300485
network_acronym_str SBU-1
network_name_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Can concomitant bladder neck incision and primary valve ablation reduce early re-admission rate and secondary intervention?Urinary Bladder Neck ObstructionAblation TechniquesUrinary Bladder, NeurogenicABSTRACT Objective: To assess the effect of bladder neck morphology and its incision (BNI) in patients with posterior urethral valve (PUV) on early reintervention rate. Patients and methods: Infants undergoing PUV ablation (PVA) before 24 months of age and had at least 18 months of follow-up, were categorized into three groups according to the bladder neck appearance on baseline radiological and endoscopic examination: group 1; normal bladder neck underwent PVA, group 2; high bladder neck underwent PVA plus BNI, group 3; high bladder neck underwent PVA only. Early reintervention was defined as the need for check cystoscopy because of persistent renal function deterioration, worsening hydronephrosis and/or unsatisfactory VCUG improvement during the 1st six months post primary PVA. Results: Between 2000 and 2017, a total of 114 patients underwent PVA and met the study criteria with a median follow-up of 58 (18-230) months. For group 1, 16 (22.9%) patients needed readmission. Check cystoscopy was free and no further intervention was performed in 5(7.5%) and re-ablation was performed in 11(15.7%) patients. For group 2, 3(14.3%) patients needed reintervention. Re-ablation and re-ablation plus BNI were performed in 1(4.8%) and 2(9.5%), respectively. For group 3, cystoscopy was free in 1(4.3%), re-ablation and re-ablation plus BNI were performed 2(8.7%) and 1(4.3%), respectively. There were no significant differences in the re-admission and re-intervention rates among the three study groups (p=0.65 and p=0.50, respectively). Conclusion: In morphologically high bladder neck associated PUV, concomitant BNI with PVA doesn’t reduce early re-intervention rate.Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia2022-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382022000300485International braz j urol v.48 n.3 2022reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)instacron:SBU10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2021.0383info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAbdelhalim,AhmedHashem,AbdelwahabAbouelenein,Ebrahim E.Atwa,Ahmed M.Soltan,MohamedHafez,Ashraf T.Dawaba,Mohamed S.Helmy,Tamer E.eng2022-07-21T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1677-55382022000300485Revistahttp://www.brazjurol.com.br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br1677-61191677-5538opendoar:2022-07-21T00:00International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Can concomitant bladder neck incision and primary valve ablation reduce early re-admission rate and secondary intervention?
title Can concomitant bladder neck incision and primary valve ablation reduce early re-admission rate and secondary intervention?
spellingShingle Can concomitant bladder neck incision and primary valve ablation reduce early re-admission rate and secondary intervention?
Abdelhalim,Ahmed
Urinary Bladder Neck Obstruction
Ablation Techniques
Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic
title_short Can concomitant bladder neck incision and primary valve ablation reduce early re-admission rate and secondary intervention?
title_full Can concomitant bladder neck incision and primary valve ablation reduce early re-admission rate and secondary intervention?
title_fullStr Can concomitant bladder neck incision and primary valve ablation reduce early re-admission rate and secondary intervention?
title_full_unstemmed Can concomitant bladder neck incision and primary valve ablation reduce early re-admission rate and secondary intervention?
title_sort Can concomitant bladder neck incision and primary valve ablation reduce early re-admission rate and secondary intervention?
author Abdelhalim,Ahmed
author_facet Abdelhalim,Ahmed
Hashem,Abdelwahab
Abouelenein,Ebrahim E.
Atwa,Ahmed M.
Soltan,Mohamed
Hafez,Ashraf T.
Dawaba,Mohamed S.
Helmy,Tamer E.
author_role author
author2 Hashem,Abdelwahab
Abouelenein,Ebrahim E.
Atwa,Ahmed M.
Soltan,Mohamed
Hafez,Ashraf T.
Dawaba,Mohamed S.
Helmy,Tamer E.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Abdelhalim,Ahmed
Hashem,Abdelwahab
Abouelenein,Ebrahim E.
Atwa,Ahmed M.
Soltan,Mohamed
Hafez,Ashraf T.
Dawaba,Mohamed S.
Helmy,Tamer E.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Urinary Bladder Neck Obstruction
Ablation Techniques
Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic
topic Urinary Bladder Neck Obstruction
Ablation Techniques
Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic
description ABSTRACT Objective: To assess the effect of bladder neck morphology and its incision (BNI) in patients with posterior urethral valve (PUV) on early reintervention rate. Patients and methods: Infants undergoing PUV ablation (PVA) before 24 months of age and had at least 18 months of follow-up, were categorized into three groups according to the bladder neck appearance on baseline radiological and endoscopic examination: group 1; normal bladder neck underwent PVA, group 2; high bladder neck underwent PVA plus BNI, group 3; high bladder neck underwent PVA only. Early reintervention was defined as the need for check cystoscopy because of persistent renal function deterioration, worsening hydronephrosis and/or unsatisfactory VCUG improvement during the 1st six months post primary PVA. Results: Between 2000 and 2017, a total of 114 patients underwent PVA and met the study criteria with a median follow-up of 58 (18-230) months. For group 1, 16 (22.9%) patients needed readmission. Check cystoscopy was free and no further intervention was performed in 5(7.5%) and re-ablation was performed in 11(15.7%) patients. For group 2, 3(14.3%) patients needed reintervention. Re-ablation and re-ablation plus BNI were performed in 1(4.8%) and 2(9.5%), respectively. For group 3, cystoscopy was free in 1(4.3%), re-ablation and re-ablation plus BNI were performed 2(8.7%) and 1(4.3%), respectively. There were no significant differences in the re-admission and re-intervention rates among the three study groups (p=0.65 and p=0.50, respectively). Conclusion: In morphologically high bladder neck associated PUV, concomitant BNI with PVA doesn’t reduce early re-intervention rate.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382022000300485
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382022000300485
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2021.0383
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv International braz j urol v.48 n.3 2022
reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron:SBU
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron_str SBU
institution SBU
reponame_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
collection International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br
_version_ 1750318078332239872