Can concomitant bladder neck incision and primary valve ablation reduce early re-admission rate and secondary intervention?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | International Braz J Urol (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382022000300485 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Objective: To assess the effect of bladder neck morphology and its incision (BNI) in patients with posterior urethral valve (PUV) on early reintervention rate. Patients and methods: Infants undergoing PUV ablation (PVA) before 24 months of age and had at least 18 months of follow-up, were categorized into three groups according to the bladder neck appearance on baseline radiological and endoscopic examination: group 1; normal bladder neck underwent PVA, group 2; high bladder neck underwent PVA plus BNI, group 3; high bladder neck underwent PVA only. Early reintervention was defined as the need for check cystoscopy because of persistent renal function deterioration, worsening hydronephrosis and/or unsatisfactory VCUG improvement during the 1st six months post primary PVA. Results: Between 2000 and 2017, a total of 114 patients underwent PVA and met the study criteria with a median follow-up of 58 (18-230) months. For group 1, 16 (22.9%) patients needed readmission. Check cystoscopy was free and no further intervention was performed in 5(7.5%) and re-ablation was performed in 11(15.7%) patients. For group 2, 3(14.3%) patients needed reintervention. Re-ablation and re-ablation plus BNI were performed in 1(4.8%) and 2(9.5%), respectively. For group 3, cystoscopy was free in 1(4.3%), re-ablation and re-ablation plus BNI were performed 2(8.7%) and 1(4.3%), respectively. There were no significant differences in the re-admission and re-intervention rates among the three study groups (p=0.65 and p=0.50, respectively). Conclusion: In morphologically high bladder neck associated PUV, concomitant BNI with PVA doesn’t reduce early re-intervention rate. |
id |
SBU-1_5e789ccae18ea2ffdd82d41e3ae7290d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1677-55382022000300485 |
network_acronym_str |
SBU-1 |
network_name_str |
International Braz J Urol (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Can concomitant bladder neck incision and primary valve ablation reduce early re-admission rate and secondary intervention?Urinary Bladder Neck ObstructionAblation TechniquesUrinary Bladder, NeurogenicABSTRACT Objective: To assess the effect of bladder neck morphology and its incision (BNI) in patients with posterior urethral valve (PUV) on early reintervention rate. Patients and methods: Infants undergoing PUV ablation (PVA) before 24 months of age and had at least 18 months of follow-up, were categorized into three groups according to the bladder neck appearance on baseline radiological and endoscopic examination: group 1; normal bladder neck underwent PVA, group 2; high bladder neck underwent PVA plus BNI, group 3; high bladder neck underwent PVA only. Early reintervention was defined as the need for check cystoscopy because of persistent renal function deterioration, worsening hydronephrosis and/or unsatisfactory VCUG improvement during the 1st six months post primary PVA. Results: Between 2000 and 2017, a total of 114 patients underwent PVA and met the study criteria with a median follow-up of 58 (18-230) months. For group 1, 16 (22.9%) patients needed readmission. Check cystoscopy was free and no further intervention was performed in 5(7.5%) and re-ablation was performed in 11(15.7%) patients. For group 2, 3(14.3%) patients needed reintervention. Re-ablation and re-ablation plus BNI were performed in 1(4.8%) and 2(9.5%), respectively. For group 3, cystoscopy was free in 1(4.3%), re-ablation and re-ablation plus BNI were performed 2(8.7%) and 1(4.3%), respectively. There were no significant differences in the re-admission and re-intervention rates among the three study groups (p=0.65 and p=0.50, respectively). Conclusion: In morphologically high bladder neck associated PUV, concomitant BNI with PVA doesn’t reduce early re-intervention rate.Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia2022-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382022000300485International braz j urol v.48 n.3 2022reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)instacron:SBU10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2021.0383info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAbdelhalim,AhmedHashem,AbdelwahabAbouelenein,Ebrahim E.Atwa,Ahmed M.Soltan,MohamedHafez,Ashraf T.Dawaba,Mohamed S.Helmy,Tamer E.eng2022-07-21T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1677-55382022000300485Revistahttp://www.brazjurol.com.br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br1677-61191677-5538opendoar:2022-07-21T00:00International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Can concomitant bladder neck incision and primary valve ablation reduce early re-admission rate and secondary intervention? |
title |
Can concomitant bladder neck incision and primary valve ablation reduce early re-admission rate and secondary intervention? |
spellingShingle |
Can concomitant bladder neck incision and primary valve ablation reduce early re-admission rate and secondary intervention? Abdelhalim,Ahmed Urinary Bladder Neck Obstruction Ablation Techniques Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic |
title_short |
Can concomitant bladder neck incision and primary valve ablation reduce early re-admission rate and secondary intervention? |
title_full |
Can concomitant bladder neck incision and primary valve ablation reduce early re-admission rate and secondary intervention? |
title_fullStr |
Can concomitant bladder neck incision and primary valve ablation reduce early re-admission rate and secondary intervention? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Can concomitant bladder neck incision and primary valve ablation reduce early re-admission rate and secondary intervention? |
title_sort |
Can concomitant bladder neck incision and primary valve ablation reduce early re-admission rate and secondary intervention? |
author |
Abdelhalim,Ahmed |
author_facet |
Abdelhalim,Ahmed Hashem,Abdelwahab Abouelenein,Ebrahim E. Atwa,Ahmed M. Soltan,Mohamed Hafez,Ashraf T. Dawaba,Mohamed S. Helmy,Tamer E. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Hashem,Abdelwahab Abouelenein,Ebrahim E. Atwa,Ahmed M. Soltan,Mohamed Hafez,Ashraf T. Dawaba,Mohamed S. Helmy,Tamer E. |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Abdelhalim,Ahmed Hashem,Abdelwahab Abouelenein,Ebrahim E. Atwa,Ahmed M. Soltan,Mohamed Hafez,Ashraf T. Dawaba,Mohamed S. Helmy,Tamer E. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Urinary Bladder Neck Obstruction Ablation Techniques Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic |
topic |
Urinary Bladder Neck Obstruction Ablation Techniques Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic |
description |
ABSTRACT Objective: To assess the effect of bladder neck morphology and its incision (BNI) in patients with posterior urethral valve (PUV) on early reintervention rate. Patients and methods: Infants undergoing PUV ablation (PVA) before 24 months of age and had at least 18 months of follow-up, were categorized into three groups according to the bladder neck appearance on baseline radiological and endoscopic examination: group 1; normal bladder neck underwent PVA, group 2; high bladder neck underwent PVA plus BNI, group 3; high bladder neck underwent PVA only. Early reintervention was defined as the need for check cystoscopy because of persistent renal function deterioration, worsening hydronephrosis and/or unsatisfactory VCUG improvement during the 1st six months post primary PVA. Results: Between 2000 and 2017, a total of 114 patients underwent PVA and met the study criteria with a median follow-up of 58 (18-230) months. For group 1, 16 (22.9%) patients needed readmission. Check cystoscopy was free and no further intervention was performed in 5(7.5%) and re-ablation was performed in 11(15.7%) patients. For group 2, 3(14.3%) patients needed reintervention. Re-ablation and re-ablation plus BNI were performed in 1(4.8%) and 2(9.5%), respectively. For group 3, cystoscopy was free in 1(4.3%), re-ablation and re-ablation plus BNI were performed 2(8.7%) and 1(4.3%), respectively. There were no significant differences in the re-admission and re-intervention rates among the three study groups (p=0.65 and p=0.50, respectively). Conclusion: In morphologically high bladder neck associated PUV, concomitant BNI with PVA doesn’t reduce early re-intervention rate. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-06-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382022000300485 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382022000300485 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2021.0383 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
International braz j urol v.48 n.3 2022 reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU) instacron:SBU |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU) |
instacron_str |
SBU |
institution |
SBU |
reponame_str |
International Braz J Urol (Online) |
collection |
International Braz J Urol (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br |
_version_ |
1750318078332239872 |